Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to www.nature.com

Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Comment
  • Published:

Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics

Use these ten principles to guide research evaluation, urge Diana Hicks, Paul Wouters and colleagues.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Wouters, P. in Beyond Bibliometrics: Harnessing Multidimensional Indicators of Scholarly Impact (eds Cronin, B. & Sugimoto, C.) 47–66 (MIT Press, 2014).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Shao, J. & Shen, H. Learned Publ. 24, 95–97 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Seglen, P. O. Br. Med. J. 314, 498–502 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Garfield, E. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 295, 90–93 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. López Piñeiro, C. & Hicks, D. Res. Eval. 24, 78–89 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. van Raan, A. F. J., van Leeuwen, T. N., Visser, M. S., van Eck, N. J. & Waltman, L. J. Informetrics 4, 431–435 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Waltman, L. et al. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 63, 2419–2432 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hirsch, J. E. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 16569–16572 (2005).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bar-Ilan, J. Scientometrics 74, 257–271 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Butler, L. Res. Policy 32, 143–155 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Diana Hicks.

Related links

Related links

Related links in Nature Research

The focus on bibliometrics makes papers less useful 2015-Jan-13

Bibliometrics: Is your most cited work your best? 2014-Oct-29

Publishing: Open citations 2013-Oct-16

Referencing: The reuse factor 2013-Oct-16

Nature special: Science metrics

Nature special: Impact

Nature Outlook: Assessing science

Related external links

Spanish and Chinese translations of the Leiden Manifesto

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hicks, D., Wouters, P., Waltman, L. et al. Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics. Nature 520, 429–431 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/520429a

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/520429a

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing Careers

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Careers newsletter — what matters in careers research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Careers