Not all ENS names carry the same guarantees. There’s an important difference between a name that points to a contract and a contract that declares its identity. That line is a security boundary. Find out why primary names matter especially as wallets begin surfacing contract identity more prominently. Worth understanding if you care about onchain trust and naming standards.
ENS supports two ways of linking names and addresses. A name can point to an address. Or an address can declare a primary name. That distinction defines a real security boundary. If multiple names point to the same contract, wallets are left to infer which identity to display. A primary name removes that ambiguity. The address explicitly asserts who it is. As ENS data becomes more visible in wallets and transaction flows, that difference matters more. In the article below, I unpack why primary names aren’t just a UX detail, they’re foundational to onchain identity.