BESS Methodology
BESS Methodology
Abstract
This methodology describes the process to design the layout of a battery energy storage system in
the software pvDesign. The authors of this methodology have proposed the following structure
for the document.
• The circuit arrangement that a battery energy storage system can adopt.
• The design of an AC-Coupled BESS schema and how to consider the topography require-
ments, the layout generation, the medium voltage lines and the integration of the system
in the interconnection facility.
• The design of a DC-Coupled BESS schema and how to generate an hybrid layout consid-
ering the photovoltaic plant constraints.
Note: All the calculations that are presented in this methodology are carried out in accordance
with the latest electrical standards.
BESS Methodology 1
Contents
Contents
Abstract 1
2 AC-Coupled BESS 8
2.1 Battery area requirements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
2.2 Topography requirements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
2.3 AC-Coupled BESS power block . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
2.4 Layout generation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
2.5 Medium voltage cables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
2.6 Interconnection facility integration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
2.7 Energy Output . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
3 DC-Coupled BESS 16
3.1 DC-Coupled BESS power block . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
3.2 Layout generation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
3.2.1 PV plant maximum/specific capacity and BESS maximum capacity . . . 20
3.2.2 PV plant maximum/specific capacity and BESS specific capacity . . . . . 20
3.2.3 Power block outside the solar field . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
3.2.4 Power block inside the solar field . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
3.3 Energy Output . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
Bibliography 25
BESS Methodology 2
List of Figures
List of Figures
3.1 The battery containers are connected to all the power stations. Source: RatedPower 20
3.2 The battery containers are connected to the power station closest to the MV point.
Source: RatedPower . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
3.3 Power station and battery container located outside the DC solar field. Source:
RatedPower . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
3.4 Distances between containers and roads or structures. Source: RatedPower . . . 22
3.5 Power station and battery container located inside the DC solar field. Source:
RatedPower . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
BESS Methodology 3
List of Tables
List of Tables
BESS Methodology 4
Chapter 1. Battery energy storage system arrangements
Chapter 1
This chapter summarizes the possible electrical BESS arrangements that are available in the in-
dustry and the one that was prioritized for the development of pvDesign. [1]
In the past, AC-coupled BESSs were most often used with residential and commercial solar in-
stallations, and DC-coupled systems were used for remote and off-grid installations, but more
options for DC-coupled systems have become available. Equipment manufacturers are devel-
oping streamlined and standardized power electronics equipment for DC-coupled BESSs. Over
the past decade, inverter technology has advanced and resulted in the development of new AC-
coupled and DC-coupled systems.
The possible layouts that can be obtained are the following ones:
1. AC Coupled BESS. In AC-coupled systems, there are separate inverters for the solar panels
and the battery. Both the solar panels and the battery module can be discharged at full
power and they can either be dispatched together or independently, creating flexibility in
how the system operates. The solar panels and battery can either share an interconnection
to the grid or run on separate interconnections.
It’s worth noting that because both the solar panel and the battery are DC-current compat-
ible, the current will need to be converted three times in an AC-coupled system. Figure 1.1
illustrates the AC-coupled BESS.
BESS Methodology 5
Chapter 1. Battery energy storage system arrangements
Figure 1.1: AC-coupled battery energy storage system diagram. Source: RatedPower
2. DC Coupled BESS. DC-coupled systems typically use solar charge controllers, or regula-
tors, to charge the battery from the solar panels, along with a battery inverter to convert
the electricity flow to AC.
The solar panels and battery module use the same inverter and share the grid intercon-
nection, reducing the cost of equipment. This also reduces power losses from inverting
the current and running separate interconnection lines to the grid, as the solar array and
battery are dispatched as a single facility. But this offers less flexibility than an AC system.
Figure 1.1 illustrates the DC-coupled BESS.
Figure 1.2: DC-coupled battery energy storage system diagram. Source: RatedPower
The software automatically generates a solution for an AC-coupled and DC-coupled BESS.
1. Retrofitting: AC-coupled batteries are easy to install on an existing solar panel system, and
more can be added to expand capacity.
2. Flexibility: Installers are not restricted in where the inverters and batteries can be located.
AC coupling works with any type of inverter.
3. Resiliency: The flexibility to install multiple inverters and batteries in different locations
helps risk of an outage if an inverter fails. Having multiple inverters provides more com-
bined power and battery faults do not have an impact on power generation.
4. Versatility: AC-coupled systems enable batteries to charge from the grid as well as the
solar panels and the grid, so if the solar panels are not generating enough electricity, the
battery can still charge from the grid.
BESS Methodology 6
Chapter 1. Battery energy storage system arrangements
1. Cost: AC-coupled systems cost more than DC-coupled systems as they use multiple in-
verters.
2. Lower efficiency: The stored energy is converted three times, from the DC current to AC
current to supply the building and then back to DC current to the battery and again back
into AC. Each conversion results in a small amount of energy loss.
3. Supply limitations: AC BESSs are not designed to be used off-grid and as they are trans-
formerless, they cannot manage the surge loads from multiple appliances.
1. Limited flexibility: Installers have less flexibility than with an AC system, as the inverter
needs to be located close to the battery.
2. Less resiliency: With a single inverter in a DC-coupled system, if the inverter fails, the
solar power as well as the battery capacity is lost.
BESS Methodology 7
Chapter 2. AC-Coupled BESS
Chapter 2
AC-Coupled BESS
This chapter describes the process for designing the layout of an AC-Coupled BESS based on main
electrical standards such as IEC and IEEE as well as practical guides. Therefore, the objective is to
obtain the dimensions of the complete layout of the system, the information related to the battery
containers, the power conversion system, the medium voltage cabling and the substation.
In the AC-Coupled schema, the batteries will be connected to the storage inverters to convert the
current from dc to ac. The AC-Coupled BESS can be split into three levels: the battery container,
the power conversion system, and the medium voltage cables. The principal elements that must
be included in every level are presented below:
Battery container
• The storage inverters. At this moment, only central inverters can be selected.
• The power transformer.
• The electrical busbar.
The medium voltage cables are used to connect the power conversion systems into an existing
substation. The software will give all the information about the characteristics of the cables such
as material, insulator, diameter, section, cores, circuits and bundles,while taking into account
external conditions, current loads, trenching system, etc...
BESS Methodology 8
Chapter 2. AC-Coupled BESS
So, it is essential to define a battery polygon (BA) and an MV placemark within that polygon.
The size of the user-defined area will determine the space available to install the storage system.
The MV point will be the interconnection point between the battery area and the substation.
Some requirements must be considered so that pvDesign can recognize that area as the battery
area:
• The polygon defining the area of the batteries must be called BA.
• The area cannot exceed 40 ha.
• The MV placemark is mandatory, and is placed inside the BA.
• The battery polygon cannot be placed inside any AA polygon.
• The battery polygon has to be located outside the ST polygon.
• A restricted area (RA) cannot be placed inside the BA.
Figure 2.1 illustrates the earthworks performed for an AC-coupled BESS layout.
Figure 2.1: AC-coupled battery energy storage topography requirements. Source: RatedPower
The inverter type and the number of inverters per PCS can be selected, thus establishing the
power of the PCS or minimum unit of the system.
∑︁
𝑆 PCS = 𝑆 inv (2.1)
Where:
BESS Methodology 9
Chapter 2. AC-Coupled BESS
In pvDesign, we assume that the storage solution is modular. The user has to set the energy of a
battery container. Alternatively, the energy of a single battery rack and the number of racks to
include per container can be set.
Where:
pvDesign will install the necessary number of containers according to the system requirements.
The supply cycle duration is calculated using Equation 2.3.
𝐸 BatCont
ℎ= (2.3)
𝑃 PCS
Where:
• ℎ is the amount of time the batteries can be charging or discharging to the grid with the
actual PCS.
• 𝑃 PCS is the rated power of the power conversion system. [W]
• 𝐸 BatCont is the energy of the battery container. [Wh]
For example, a 2000 kW PCS and a 3000 kWh container, the supply time (time taken for a complete
charge or discharge cycle) will be 1.5 hours. If you connect two battery containers (6000 kWh)
to the same PCS, you would have a system with 3 hours of supply.
The system can be sized using power factor requirements. The required power factor at the
storage inverter’s output is calculated so the AC-coupled battery system can compensate reactive
power to comply with the requirement defined by the user. A detailed explanation of how the
required power factor is calculated can be found in our power factor methodology [3].
Then, if sizing using power factor requirements is enabled, the rated power of the power con-
version system is calculated using Equation 2.4
Where:
BESS Methodology 10
Chapter 2. AC-Coupled BESS
• Maximum capacity: selecting this option, the maximum possible power will be installed
in the area defined for the BESS.
• Specific capacity: The user is able to configure a specific size for the battery system by
defining the number of PCS to install. The system power will be the multiple of the PCS
power.
The following distances presented in Figure 2.2 can be found in the AC-Coupled BESS layout:
• Ds-s or the distance between adjacent blocks can be defined by the user.
• Df-f or the distance between opposing blocks can be defined by the user.
• According to [4], the safety distances between containers or Db-b is fixed to 0.9144 m (3
ft).
• According to [4], the safety distance between containers and PCSs or Db-p is fixed to 1.524
m (5 ft).
The dimensions of the battery containers and the power conversion system will be determined
by the user. In order to keep the same pvDesign philosophy with the power station dimensions of
the PV plant, the height, length and width of the container are inputs. All the battery containers
and power conversion systems will have the same dimensions.
Figure 2.2: Safety distances between battery power blocks. Source: RatedPower
The next step when generating the layout is to calculate the optimal rotation angle of the layout
for the battery placements. The idea behind this is the fact that a rectangular shape is usually
the best when it comes to placing the maximum amount of batteries. For example, for the next
polygon, the best direction to place the batteries is determined by the red arrow.
BESS Methodology 11
Chapter 2. AC-Coupled BESS
The grey dots of the Figure 2.3 represent the area specified by the user. The big blue rectangle
is the smallest surrounding rectangle that contains the available area. The red line would be a
good direction to follow when installing the layout and the small blue rectangles are the battery
plus the PCS groups.
Figure 2.3: Optimized rotation angle of the BESS layout. Source: RatedPower
In addition, the user can edit the BESS placement by customizing the orientation angle. The
orientation angle plays a role in determining the system’s efficiency and space utilization. The
users are provided with three distinct options to set the BESS orientation according to their
specific requirements.
• Rotated (recommended/user input): For a more personalized approach, users have the flex-
ibility to define a custom orientation angle that aligns with their specific project needs or
site characteristics.
• Vertical alignment (90º): This option allows the user to choose a vertical BESS orientation,
enabling efficient use of vertical space.
• Horizontal alignment (0º): By selecting this option, the BESS layout will be aligned hori-
zontally, ensuring maximum efficiency in terms of horizontal space utilization.
After determining the number of containers per group and using the dimensions of the different
components, the group’s dimensions can be calculated individually. For this, two arrangements
can be established. The first one would be the “PCS in front" arrangement. The second configu-
ration is the “PCS in side" can be seen in Figure 3.2
As an initial approach, the PCS in front solution seems to be better in general and will be the
arrangement adopted by default.
Regarding the location of the power blocks within the battery area boundaries, the power con-
version system would be facing the MV point placed in the battery area by the user. The PCSs
will be oriented so the distance to the MV point of the battery area is reduced. Also, the battery
groups will be installed to be closer to this MV point.
BESS Methodology 12
Chapter 2. AC-Coupled BESS
Figure 2.4: PCs in front at the left. PCS in side at the right. Source: RatedPower
The most significant criterion that affects the high power cables is the maximum current-carrying
capacity. For more details about how to size the cables, it is recommended to read the electri-
cal methodology which is available in pvDesign. In this document, only the most important
parameters to size the cables are mentioned:
BESS Methodology 13
Chapter 2. AC-Coupled BESS
• Number of three-phase conductor per system. This will be taken into account to calculate
the cable grouping correction factor.
The maximum number of power conversion systems connected to the same MV circuit comply
with Equation 2.5.
Where:
The length of the MV cables are calculated based on the layout generated by pvDesign.
𝑆 ST = 𝑆 PV + 𝑆 BESS (2.6)
Where:
The distribution of the PV and BESS MV lines to the substation complies with the following
objectives:
• The number of MV primary cubicles that are shared by PV and BESS MV lines will be at
most 1.
• The capacities of all MV primary cubicles of the substation are as balanced as possible.
• The overpower losses at the inverter. This loss is equivalent to energy available to charge
a DC coupled battery.
• The clipping losses, calculated at the substation bars. This loss is equivalent to energy
available to charge an AC coupled battery.
BESS Methodology 14
Chapter 2. AC-Coupled BESS
Detailed information regarding the model can be found in [7]. Users can use these estimates to
feed other calculation models, such as internal tools, or other software.
BESS Methodology 15
Chapter 3. DC-Coupled BESS
Chapter 3
DC-Coupled BESS
This chapter describes the process for designing the layout of a DC-Coupled BESS based on
main electrical standards as well as practical guides. Therefore, the objective is to obtain the
dimensions of the complete layout of the system, considering the PV plant constraints.
In the DC-Coupled schema, the batteries will be connected to the PV plant inverters to convert
the current from dc to ac. The DC-Coupled BESS can be split into the battery containers that are
located within the PV plant boundaries and the power stations of the PV plant. The principal
elements that must be included in every level are presented below:
Battery container
• The PV inverters.
• The power transformer.
• The electrical busbar.
1. The user has chosen the DC-coupled schema as the BESS arrangement.
2. The users has selected central inverters as the ones for the photovoltaic plant. DC-Coupled
BESS schema will not be available for PV plants with string inverters.
In addition, only primary inverters and main default power stations, those with the highest in-
verter capacity, will have storage (DC/DC converters). Non-default power stations will not have
DC/DC converters and battery containers.
BESS Methodology 16
Chapter 3. DC-Coupled BESS
The power block of a DC-Coupled BESS schema is dependent on the electrical parameters of the
PV plant primary inverters, the DC/DC converter characteristics and the battery containers. The
minimum unit or block of the BESS is the set of a power station and the DC/DC converter and
battery containers connected to it.
The DC/DC converter power per inverter is calculated by Equation 3.1 and the BESS/PV power
ratio is given in Equation 3.2.
𝑁 DC/DC · 𝑃 DC/DC
𝑅BESS/PV = (3.2)
𝑃 inv
Where:
The DC/DC converters (buck/boost converter) change (step up/down) the battery voltage to the
inverter input voltage (equivalent to the string voltage of the PV plant). A generic converter
power can be defined as a program input. That is, the maximum continuous power (included in
the DC/DC databases).
Where:
1.5 · 𝑃 inv
𝑃 DC/DC max = (3.4)
𝑁 DC/DC
Where:
BESS Methodology 17
Chapter 3. DC-Coupled BESS
0.1 · 𝑃 inv
𝑃 DC/DC min = (3.5)
𝑁 DC/DC
Where:
Once the maximum continuous power per converter have been set, the number of converters
for central inverter can be defined. The maximum number of converters per inverter is given in
Equation 3.6.
𝑃 DC/DC
𝑁 DC/DC max = ≤ 1.5 (3.6)
𝑃 inv
Where:
And the power conversion system discharge power is given in Equation 3.7.
Where:
In pvDesign, we assume that the storage solution is modular. The user has to set the energy of a
battery container. Alternatively, the energy of a single battery rack and the number of racks to
include per container can be set.
Where:
BESS Methodology 18
Chapter 3. DC-Coupled BESS
pvDesign will install the necessary number of containers according to the system requirements.
The supply cycle duration is calculated in Equation 3.9.
𝐸 BatCont
ℎ= (3.9)
𝑃 PCS
Where:
• ℎ is the amount of time the batteries can be discharging from the grid. The charging hours
might be higher than supply hours defined. The maximum hours of supply are 24 hours.
• 𝑃PCS is the discharge power of the system. [W]
• 𝐸 BatCont is the energy of the battery container. [Wh]
The maximum number of battery containers that can be connected to the power station will be
6. By default, 1 container per PS will be recommended.
• Maximum capacity: selecting this option, the maximum possible power will be installed.
All default power stations will have battery containers, only the primary central inverters
of those power stations. It is not possible for a non-default power station to have storage.
• Specific capacity: The user defines the amount of desired power stations with battery con-
tainers to install. Default power stations will have battery containers, only the primary
central inverters of those power stations. It is not possible for a non-default power station
to have storage. The desired rated power is calculated using Equation 3.10.
Where:
However, the real amount of power stations will be calculated after running the design
since it depends on how many main power stations are going to be installed.
BESS Methodology 19
Chapter 3. DC-Coupled BESS
Figure 3.1: The battery containers are connected to all the power stations. Source: RatedPower
Figure 3.2: The battery containers are connected to the power station closest to the MV point.
Source: RatedPower
BESS Methodology 20
Chapter 3. DC-Coupled BESS
Figure 3.3: Power station and battery container located outside the DC solar field. Source: Rat-
edPower
The dimensions of the battery containers will be determined by the user. In order to keep the
same pvDesign philosophy with the power station dimensions of the PV plant, the height, length
and width of the container would be the inputs. All the battery containers will have the same
dimensions.
The following distances are taken into account in order to locate the battery containers close to
the power stations:
• The battery container to road distance can be defined as a setback. The same value limits
will be considered for setbacks as those currently considered for the power stations to road
distances. The minimum value will be 1.5 m and the maximum value lower than 100 m.
• According to the NFPA 855 standard, the safety distance between containers and structures
must be greater than 1.524 m (5 ft) and less than 4.572 m (15 ft).
• According to the NFPA 855 standard, the safety distance between containers must be
greater than 0.9144 m (3 ft) and less than 4.572 m (15 ft).
• According to the NFPA 855 standard, the safety distance between containers and the power
station must be greater than 1.524 m (5 ft) and less than 4.572 m (15 ft).
BESS Methodology 21
Chapter 3. DC-Coupled BESS
So, the distances presented in Figure 3.4 from the axis of the battery container - power station
block to the roads will be:
Where:
• 𝐷 axis-road is the distance of the axis of the block to the road. [m]
• 𝑑 PS-road is the distance from the power stations to the road [m]. The minimum 𝑑 PS-road is
equal to 1.5 m.
• 𝑤 PS is width of the power station. [m]
• 𝑑 BESS-road is the distance from the battery container to the road. [m]
• 𝑤 BESS is width of the battery container. [m]
Where:
• 𝐷 axis-structure is the distance of the axis of the block to the structures. [m]
• 𝑑 PS-structure is the distance from the power stations to the structures. [m]
• 𝑤 PS is width of the power station. [m]
• 𝑑 BESS-structure is the distance from the battery container to the structures. [m]
• 𝑤 BESS is width of the battery container. [m]
Figure 3.4: Distances between containers and roads or structures. Source: RatedPower
BESS Methodology 22
Chapter 3. DC-Coupled BESS
Figure 3.5: Power station and battery container located inside the DC solar field. Source: Rated-
Power
The arrangement of the power station and the battery containers must meet the following con-
ditions:
• The PS must have direct access to the road (i.e. one of its sides must be in contact with the
road, without containers or structures in between).
• The PS should be placed parallel or perpendicular to the structures.
• The battery containers can be placed parallel or perpendicular to the structures.
• The selected arrangement should be the one that deletes the fewest structures. If aligning
the containers in the same row deletes the same amount of structures as having more than
one row of containers, the case where all the containers are aligned is prioritized.
The dimensions of the battery containers will be determined by the user. In order to keep the
same pvDesign philosophy with the power station dimensions of the PV plant, the height, length
and width of the container are inputs. All the battery containers will have the same dimensions.
The following distances are taken into account in order to locate the battery containers:
BESS Methodology 23
Chapter 3. DC-Coupled BESS
• According to [4], the safety distance between containers must be greater than 0.9144 m (3
ft) and less than 4.572 m (15 ft).
• According to [4], the safety distance between containers and the power station must be
greater than 1.524 m (5 ft) and less than 4.572 m (15 ft).
• The summatory of the overpower losses at the inverters with storage. This loss is equiva-
lent to the energy available to charge a DC coupled battery.
• The summatory of the overpower losses at the inverters without storage. This loss cannot
be recovered because these inverters do not have DC/DC converters or batteries to store
these losses.
Detailed information regarding the model can be found in [7]. Users can use these estimates to
feed other calculation models, such as internal tools, or other software.
BESS Methodology 24
Bibliography
Bibliography
[1] N. Opie. “Ac vs dc-coupled bess: The pros and cons.” (Apr. 2023), [Online]. Available: https:
//ratedpower.com/blog/ac-vs-dc-coupled-bess/.
[2] F. I. Pérez Cicala, M. Bennekers Vallejo and M. A. Torrero Rionegro, “Topography Analysis
Methodology,” RatedPower, 2023.
[3] F. I. Pérez Cicala, I. Álvarez Iberlucea, M. A. Torrero Rionegro, A. Benito Oliva, “Power
Factor Methodology,” RatedPower, 2023.
[4] Energy Storage Systems Committee, “Standard for the Installation of Stationary Energy
Storage Systems,” National Fire Protection Association, NFPA 855, 2023.
[5] Technical Committee 20, “Power cables with extruded insulation and their accessories for
rated voltages from 1 kV (Um = 1,2 kV) up to 30 kV (Um = 36 kV) - Part 2: Cables for rated
voltages from 6 kV (Um = 7,2 kV) up to 30 kV (Um = 36 kV),” International Electrotechnical
Commision, IEC 60502-2:2014, 2014.
[6] National Electrical Code Committee, “NFPA 70 National Electrical Code,” International Stan-
dard, 2017.
[7] F. I. Pérez Cicala, Á. Pajares Barroso, J. Romero González and M. A. Torrero Rionegro, “pvDe-
sign Energy Yield Methodology,” RatedPower, 2023.
BESS Methodology 25