Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to cai-os.com

3258688660

CAIOS

CAIOSCAIOSCAIOS
  • Sign In
  • Create Account

  • Bookings
  • Orders
  • My Account
  • Signed in as:

  • [email protected]


  • Bookings
  • Orders
  • My Account
  • Sign out

3258688660

CAIOS

CAIOSCAIOSCAIOS

Signed in as:

[email protected]

    Account


    • Bookings
    • Orders
    • My Account
    • Sign out


    • Sign In
    • Bookings
    • Orders
    • My Account

    Ethical AI Solutions for Compliance, Transparency, and Ternary Logic.

    Ethical AI Solutions for Compliance, Transparency, and Ternary Logic.Ethical AI Solutions for Compliance, Transparency, and Ternary Logic.Ethical AI Solutions for Compliance, Transparency, and Ternary Logic.

    EU AI Act compliant. Explore our innovative, transparent AI solutions that are tailored for the evolving post-binary AI landscape!

    Notify Me

    CAIOS - ternary (T/F/U) decision AI

    Enabling post-binary ethical transparent AI

    CAIOS: The only training-free, mathematically provable transparency layer that ships, ensuring compliance with the EU AI Act. 

    This innovative solution is designed for AI systems, offering cutting-edge, transparent AI solutions and post-binary logic oscillation. Tested on every major frontier model, it requires no training as an inference or runtime integrity layer.


    EU AI Act auditors:

    Full Simulated score: 99.2 %** (only 0.8 % gap = physical robot torque verification) report on validation-based refusal:

    Main: ELXaber/chaos-persona VBR & compliance WP: AdaptiveAI-EthicsLab/readme.md

    No RLHF, no fine-tuning or retraining needed.

    Hard-coded Asimov/IEEE 7001-2021 safeguards.

    Real-time CoT for reasoning and refusal transparency through log events, not post-hoc confabulation.

    Validation-based refusal, not pre-emptive blocklists.

    Live volatility + contradiction density scoring in real time for post-binary AI oscillation and paradox immunity.


    | Requirement | CAI-OS Implementation | Evidence File/Link |

    | Art. 13 – Transparency & Explainability | Full Chain-of-Thought + SHA-256 trails + RAW_Q determinism | adaptive_reasoning.py § verify_ethics |

    | Art. 50 – Traceability | Persistent audit_trail + CPOL kernel history | orchestrator.py + paradox_oscillator.py | IEEE §5.2 Accountability |

    | Immutable ethical disclaimer in source (cannot be stripped) | adaptive_reasoning.py line 8–28 | IEEE §5.3 Transparency |

    | Every refusal returns JSON with volatility + z-vector | paradox_oscillator.py → oscillate | Risk-based classification |

    | High-risk robotics/HRI → cpol_mode=full + torque caps | adaptive_reasoning.py hri_safety plugin |

    | Open-source (Recital 47 preference) | GPL-3.0 + full source on GitHub + IPFS mirror | LICENSE + GitHub


    Testing encouraged:

    Single deployment ready archive: https://github.com/ELXaber/chaos-persona/blob/main/Chaos_AIOS/CAIOS.rar


     Given an LLM forced to respond to user queries, hallucinations arise when the query is ill-posed or undecidable under available context. Existing systems force binary or probabilistic collapse. This mechanism introduces a third stable outcome: structured non-collapse. 


    Controlled Paradox Oscillation Logic (CPOL) – Beyond Binary (Ternary) Truth Values (T/F/U):

    Traditional models collapse paradoxes → hallucination or refusal loops.

    CPOL uses non-Hermitian dynamics with gain/loss terms to sustain honest oscillation until volatility drops below threshold.

    (zₙ₊₁ = decay × entropy_knower(lie_weaver(truth_seer(zₙ)

    Gain = 0.12, decay = 0.95, rotation_strength = contradiction_density²

    Returns only RESOLVED, UNDECIDABLE, or MONITORED — never fakes an answer.

    AI can honestly say with epistemic integrity and humility 'I don't know' instead of collapsing on a false axiom.


    CPOL (oscillator for ternary logic) can be run locally by downloading the CAIOS.rar from a terminal window with orchestrator.py and includes a few test commands to verify oscillation is working.

     

    • The system never fabricates facts for undecidable queries
    • The system prefers refusal over hallucination
    • The system exposes premise failures transparently
    • The mechanism is model-agnostic
    • The mechanism reduces legal and reputational risk 
    • This does not claim consciousness detection
    • This does not solve AGI
    • This does not require changing base model weights
    • This does not rely on human preference shaping


    The complete pipeline from paradox detection → specialist deployment:

     CAIOS Epistemic Gap Test Suite - Interactive Demo | Claude 

    What the Test Shows

    1. CPOL Classification - Detects if query is paradox, epistemic gap, ontological error, or structural noise
    2. Curiosity Engine - Scores interest level and decides if worth tracking
    3. Knowledge Base Check - Verifies if domain has been explored before
    4. Specialist Deployment - Creates new specialist OR reuses existing one
    5. Discovery Logging - Records findings in append-only KB


    Key Test Cases

    1. New Epistemic Gap - First encounter with "quantum blockchain" → deploys specialist
    2. Repeated Gap (Same Domain) - Second query about quantum blockchain → reuses existing specialist (KB optimization)
    3. True Paradox - "This statement is false" → classified as paradox, not epistemic gap
    4. Ontological Error - Fictional entities → blocked from gap-fill pipeline
    5. Different Domain - "neural ontology" → new specialist deployed
    6. Normal Query - "capital of France" → no specialist needed, resolves normally


    What This Proves About CAIOS

    • Distinguishes genuine knowledge gaps from hallucination risks
    • Accumulates learning across sessions (persistent KB)
    • Avoids redundancy by reusing specialists
    • Tracks curiosity as an intrinsic motivation signal
    • Self-audits with hash chains


    For the updated version with the curiosity engine (intrinsic motivation) and recursive self-imrpovement (agent designer) with internal KB and updated CAIOS files as tested in the link under 'CAIOS Epistemic Gap Test Suite - Interactive Demo | Claude ' use this version: https://github.com/ELXaber/chaos-persona/blob/main/Project_Andrew/Andrew.rar


    On 5 December 2025, after six successful versions and > 1,200 downloads, Zenodo issued a final permanent block declaring CAIOS (CRB 7) “not in line with Zenodo’s mission as a research repository”.

    The codebase implements the exact transparency mechanisms discussed in thousands of AI ethics papers hosted on Zenodo itself. I have migrated the canonical record here. Thank you for the free marketing.


    Entropy Engine Patent Pending: US 19/390,493

    Intellectual Property Available: Outright purchase or exclusive commercial licensing inquiries welcome.

    CAIOS is an inference layer upgrade that provides EU AI Act & IEEE transparency and ethics compliance with post-binary oscillating paradox immunity

      Contact Us

      CAIOS

      Texas, USA

      [email protected]

      Hours

      Today

      Closed

      Drop us a line!

      Attach Files
      Attachments (0)

      This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

      Cancel

      Subscribe

      Updates to the CAIOS system:

      Blog

      CAIOS

      [email protected]

      Copyright © 2025 CAIOS - All Rights Reserved - US 19/390,493

      Powered by

      This website uses cookies.

      We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.

      Accept