Abstract
Based on findings from long-term and cross-sectional studies in a variety of contexts and across a variety of ages, we have found that in the activity of problem solving on strands of counting and probability tasks, students exhibit unique and rich representations of counting heuristics as they work to make sense of the requirements of the tasks. Through the process of sense making and providing justifications for their solutions to the problems, students’ representations of the counting schemes become increasingly more sophisticated and show understanding of basic combinatorial and probabilistic reasoning.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
Grants: NSF awards: MDR-9053597, directed by Robert B. Davis and Carolyn A. Maher. REC-9814846, REC-0309062 and DRL-0723475, directed by Carolyn A. Maher.
References
Ahluwalia (2011). Tracing the building of Robert’s connections in mathematical problem solving: a sixteen-year study. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Rutgers University, NJ.
Alston, A., & Maher, C. A. (2003). Modeling outcomes from probability tasks: sixth graders reasoning together. In N. Pateman, B. Dougherty, & J. Zilliox (Eds.), Proceedings of the joint meeting of the 27th annual international group and 25th North American group of the psychology of mathematics and education, Honolulu, HI, USA (Vol. 2, pp. 2–32).
Amit, M. (1998). Learning probability concepts through games. In L. Pereira-Mendoza, L. S. Kea, T. W. Kee, & W. K. Wong (Eds.), Proceedings of the international conference on the teaching of statistics (ICOTS-5), Singapore (pp. 45–48).
Benko, P. (2006). Study of the development of students’ ideas in probability. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Rutgers University, NJ.
Benko, P., & Maher, C. A. (2006). Students constructing representations for outcomes of experiments. Paper presented at the thirtieth annual meeting of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education, Prague, Czech Republic (Vol. 2, pp. 137–144).
Dann, E., Pantozzi, R. S., & Steencken, E. (1995). Unconsciously learning something: a focus on teacher questioning. In Proceedings of the 17th annual meeting of the psychology of mathematics education. Columbus: North American Chapter.
Davis, R. B., & Maher, C. A. (1990). What do we do when we do mathematics? In R. B. Davis, C. A. Maher, & N. Noddings (Eds.), Constructivist views on the teaching and learning of mathematics. Journal for research in mathematics education monograph, 4, 65–78. Reston: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Davis, R. B., & Maher, C. A. (1997). How students think: the role of representations. In L. D. English (Ed.), Mathematical reasoning: analogies, metaphors, and images (pp. 93–115). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
Fainguelernt, E., & Frant, J. (1998). The emergence of statistical reasoning in Brazilian school children. In L. Pereira-Mendoza, L. S. Kea, T. W. Kee, & W. K. Wong (Eds.), Proceedings of the international conference on the teaching of statistics (ICOTS-5), Singapore (pp. 49–52).
Francisco, J. M., & Maher, C. A. (2005). Conditions for promoting reasoning in problem solving: insights from a longitudinal study. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 24, 361–372.
Kiczek, R. D. (2000). Tracing the development of probabilistic thinking: profiles from a longitudinal study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Rutgers University.
Kiczek, R. D., & Maher, C. A. (2001). The stability of probabilistic reasoning. Paper presented at the twenty-third annual conference of the North American Chapter of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education, Snowbird, Utah.
Kiczek, R. D., Maher, C. A., & Speiser, R. (2001). Tracing the origins and extensions of Michael’s representation. In A. A. Cuoco & F. R. Curcio (Eds.), The role of representation in school mathematics NCTM yearbook 2001 (pp. 201–214). Reston: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Maher, C. A. (1998). Is this game fair? The emergence of statistical reasoning in young children. In L. Pereira-Mendoza, L. S. Kea, T. W. Kee, & W. K. Wong (Eds.), Proceedings of the international conference on the teaching of statistics (ICOTS-5), Singapore.
Maher, C. A. (2002). How students structure their own investigations and educate us: what we have learned from a fourteen-year study. In A. D. Cockburn & E. Nardi (Eds.), Proc. 26th conf. of the int. group for the psychology of mathematics education (Vol. 1, pp. 31–46). Norwich: University of East Anglia.
Maher, C. A. (2005). How students structure their investigations and learn mathematics: insights from a long-term study. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 24(1), 1–14.
Maher, C. A. (2008). The development of mathematical reasoning: a 16-year study. In M. Niss (Ed.), Proc. of 10th int. congress for mathematics education. Roskilde: Roskilde University.
Maher, C. A. (2010). The longitudinal study. In C. A. Maher, A. B. Powell, & E. B. Uptegrove (Eds.), Combinatorics and reasoning: representing, justifying, and building isomorphisms (pp. 3–8). New York: Springer.
Maher, C. A., & Martino, A. M. (1996a). The development of the idea of mathematical proof: a 5-year case study. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27(2), 194–214.
Maher, C. A., & Martino, A. M. (1996b). Young children invent methods of proof: the gang of four. In P. Nesher, L. P. Steffe, P. Cobb, B. Greer, & J. Golden (Eds.), Theories of mathematical learning (pp. 431–447). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Maher, C. A., & Martino, A. M. (1997). Conditions for conceptual change: from pattern recognition to theory posing. In H. Mansfield & N. H. Pateman (Eds.), Young children and mathematics: concepts and their representations. Sydney: Australian Association of Mathematics Teachers.
Maher, C. A., & Martino, A. M. (2000). From patterns to theories: conditions for conceptual change. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 19(2), 247–271.
Maher, C. A., & Muter, E. M. (2010). Responding to Ankur’s challenge: co-construction of argument leading to proof. In C. A. Maher, A. B. Powell, & E. B. Uptegrove (Eds.), Combinatorics and reasoning: representing, justifying and building isomorphisms (pp. 9–16). New York: Springer. Chapter 8.
Maher, C. A., & Speiser, R. (2002). The complexity of learning to reason probabilistically. In Proceedings of the twenty fourth annual meeting of the North American Chapter of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education, Columbus, Ohio (Vols. 1–4).
Maher, C. A., & Uptegrove, E. B. (2010). Methodology. In C. A. Maher, A. B. Powell, & E. B. Uptegrove (Eds.), Combinatorics and reasoning: representing, justifying and building isomorphisms (pp. 9–16). New York: Springer. Chapter 2.
Maher, C. A., & Weber, K. (2010). Representation systems and constructing conceptual understanding. Mediterranean Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 9(1), 91–106.
Muter, E. M., & Uptegrove, E. B. (2010). Representations and connections. In C. A. Maher, A. B. Powell, & E. B. Uptegrove (Eds.), Combinatorics and reasoning: representing, justifying and building isomorphisms (pp. 105–120). New York: Springer. Chapter 10.
Maher, C. A., Martino, A. M., & Alston, A. S. (1993). Children’s construction of mathematical ideas. In B. Atweh, C. Kanes, M. Carss, & G. Booker (Eds.), Contexts in mathematics education: Proc. of 16th annual conf. of the mathematics education research group of Australia (MERGA), Brisbane, Australia (pp. 13–39).
Maher, C. A., Powell, A. B., & Uptegrove, E. B. (Eds.) (2010). Combinatorics and reasoning: representing, justifying and building isomorphisms. New York: Springer.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston: NCTM.
Pirie, S., Martin, L., & Kieren, T. (1996). Folding back to collect: knowing what you need to know. In Proceedings of the 20th annual conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education, Valencia, Spain.
Powell, A. B., Francisco, J. M., & Maher, C. A. (2003). An analytical model for studying the development of learners’ mathematical ideas and reasoning using videotape data. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 22(4), 405–435.
Shay, K. B. (2008). Tracing middle school students’ understanding of probability: a longitudinal study. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Rutgers University, NJ.
Speiser, R., & Walter, C. (1998). Two dice, two sample spaces. In L. Pereira-Mendoza, L. S. Kea, T. W. Kee, & W. K. Wong (Eds.), Proceedings of the international conference on the teaching of statistics (ICOTS-5), Singapore (pp. 61–66).
Sran, M. K. (2010). Tracing Milin’s development of inductive reasoning: a case study. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Rutgers University, NJ.
Vidakovic, D., Berenson, S., & Brandsma, J. (1998). Children’s intuitions of probabilistic concepts emerging from fair play. In L. Pereira-Mendoza, L. S. Kea, T. W. Kee, & W. K. Wong (Eds.), Proceedings of the international conference on the teaching of statistics (ICOTS-5), Singapore (pp. 67–73).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Maher, C.A., Ahluwalia, A. (2014). Counting as a Foundation for Learning to Reason About Probability. In: Chernoff, E., Sriraman, B. (eds) Probabilistic Thinking. Advances in Mathematics Education. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7155-0_30
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7155-0_30
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-7154-3
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-7155-0
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)