Abstract
The relationship between the Experimental Analysis of Behavior (EAB) and Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA) has been the subject of several editorials and commentaries in recent years. Various authors have argued that researchers in these two fields (a) have become isolated from each other, (b) face different requirements for survival in their respective fields, and (c) possess different skills to meet those requirements. The present paper provides an allegory for the relationship between EAB and ABA in terms of biological speciation. The conditions that have changed the relationship between EAB and ABA are parallel to those responsible for biological speciation: (a) isolation of some members of a species from the rest of the population, (b) different contingencies of survival for members of the two separate groups, and (c) divergence in the adaptive characteristics displayed by the two groups. When members of two different groups, descendants of common ancestors, no longer are capable of producing viable offspring by interbreeding, the different groups then represent different species. To the extent that members of the EAB group and members of the ABA group interact with each other only trivially, they each represent allegorically different species. Changes in the relationship between EAB and ABA are part of a natural process that takes place in many other sciences, and the course of that process can hardly be reversed by us.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ausubel, D. P. (1969). The nature of educational research. In W. J. Gephart & R. B. Ingle (Eds.), Educational research: Selected readings (pp. 5–13). Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.
Azrin, N. H. (1977). A strategy for applied research: Learning based but outcome oriented. American Psychologist, 32, 140–149.
Baer, D. M. (1981). A flight of behavior analysis. The Behavior Analyst, 4, 85–91.
Baer, D. M. (1986). In application, frequency is not the only estimate of the probability of behavioral units. In T. Thompson & M. D. Zeiler (Eds.), Analysis and integration of behavioral units (pp. 117–136). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Baer, D. M. (1987). Weak contingencies, strong contingencies, and many behaviors to change. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 20, 335–337.
Baer, D. M., Wolf, M. M., & Risley, T. R. (1968). Some current dimensions of applied behavior analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1, 91–97.
Bain, H. P., & Groseclose, J. R. (1979). The dissemination dilemma and a plan for uniting disseminators and practitioners. Phi Delta Kappan, 61, 101–103.
Baum, W. M. (1974). On two types of deviation from the matching law: Bias and undermatching. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 22, 231–242.
Birnbrauer, J. S. (1979). Applied behavior analysis, service, and the acquisition of knowledge. The Behavior Analyst, 2 (1), 15–21.
Brady, M. P., Gunter, P., & Langford, C. A. (1985). Why aren’t research results in practice? In M. P. Brady & P. L. Gunter (Eds.), Integrating moderately and severely handicapped learners: Strategies that work (pp. 282–294). Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
Branch, M. N., & Malagodi, E. F. (1980). Where have all the behaviorists gone? The Behavior Analyst, 3 (1), 31–38.
Darwin, C. (1859). On the origin of species by means of natural selection, or the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life. London: John Murray. Facsimile of 6th ed., New York: P. F. Collier and Son.
Deitz, S. M. (1978). Current status of applied behavior analysis: Science versus technology. American Psychologist, 33, 805–814.
Dobzhansky, T., Ayala, F. J., Stebbins, G. L., & Valentine, J. W. (1977). Evolution. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.
Drew, C. J., & Buchanan, M. L. (1979). Research on teacher education. Teacher Education and Special Education, 2 (2), 50–55.
Eldredge, N. (1985). Time frames: The rethinking of Darwinian evolution and the theory of punctuated equilibria. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Eldredge, N., & Gould, S. J. (1972). Punctuated equilibria: An alternative to phyletic gradualism. In T. J. M. Schopf (Ed.), Models in paleobiology (pp. 82–115). San Francisco: Freeman, Cooper, and Co.
Epling, W. F., & Pierce, W. D. (1983). Applied behavior analysis: New directions from the laboratory. The Behavior Analyst, 6, 27–37.
Epling, W. F., & Pierce, W. D. (1986). The basic importance of applied behavior analysis. The Behavior Analyst, 9, 89–99.
Fife, J. D. (1979). Improving the use of higher education research. Research in Higher Education, 10, 189–192.
Fuqua, R. W. (1984). Comments on the applied relevance of the matching law. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 17, 381–386.
Gould, S. J. (1983). Hen’s teeth and horse’s toes. New York: W. H. Norton.
Hawking, S. W. (1988). A brief history of time. New York: Bantam Books.
Hayes, S. C. (1978). Theory and technology in behavior analysis. The Behavior Analyst, 1 (1), 25–33.
Hayes, S. C., Rincover, A., & Solnick, J. V. (1980). The techinical drift of applied behavior analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 13, 275–285.
Heimstein, R. J. (1970). On the law of effect. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 13, 243–266.
Kerlinger, F. N. (1977). The influence of research on educational practice. Educational Researcher, 6 (8), 5–12.
Krathwohl, D. (1977). Improving educational research and development. Educational Researcher, 6 (4), 8–14.
Mayr, E. (1942). Systematics and the origin of species. New York: Columbia University Press.
Mayr, E. (1976). Evolution and the diversity of life: Selected essays. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
McDowell, J. J (1982). The importance of Herrnstein’s mathematical statement of the law of effect for behavior therapy. American Psychologist, 37, 771–779.
McDowell, J. J (1988). Matching theory in natural human environments. The Behavior Analyst, 11, 95–109.
Michael, J. (1980). Flight from behavior analysis. The Behavior Analyst, 3 (2), 1–22.
Myerson, J., & Hale, S. (1984). Practical implications of the matching law. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 17, 367–380.
Pierce, W. D., & Epling, W. F. (1980). What happened to analysis in applied behavior analysis? The Behavior Analyst, 3 (1), 1–9.
Poling, A., Picker, M., Grossen, D., Hall-Johnson, E., & Holbrook, M. (1981). The schism between experimental and applied behavior analysis: Is it real and who cares? The Behavior Analyst, 4, 93–102.
Prehm, H. J. (1976). Special education research: Retrospect and prospect. Exceptional Children, 43, 10–19.
Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Skinner, B. F. (1974). About behaviorism. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
Wagner, M. (1868). Die Darwinische theorie und das migrationsgesetz der Organismen [The Darwinian theory and the law of migration of organisms]. Leipzig, Germany: Duncker and Humblot.
Wilcox, B. A. (1987). Editorial. Conservation Biology, 1, 188–189.
Young, N. (1982). Like an Inca. Los Angeles: Silver Fiddle Publishing.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rider, D.P. The Speciation of Behavior Analysis. BEHAV ANALYST 14, 171–181 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392567
Published:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392567