Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to link.springer.com

Skip to main content
Log in

The palatability of Arctic willow for greater snow geese: the role of nutrients and deterring factors

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Temporary feeding on willow buds and leaves by nesting greater snow geese provided us with an opportunity to test the relative importance of nutrients and deterrents in affecting the palatability for geese of a food plant with a high phenol content. Protein, total phenol and fiber (neutral and acid detergent fiber, and lignin) were analyzed in closed and open buds and in rolled and open leaves. Geese feed on willows at the open-buds and rolled-leaf stages but not at the closed-bud and open-leaf stages. Protein content was higher in open buds and rolled leaves (25–27%) than in closed buds and open leaves (19–21%). Phenol content increased during leaf emergence but was already high (14%) in rolled leaves. All plant fibers were very high in closed buds but declined rapidly during leaf emergence. The increase in phenol: protein ratio appeared to be more important than phenol concentration alone in explaining the cessation of feeding by geese on willow leaves whereas the high fiber content of closed buds may explain why they were not eaten. Our results illustrate the value of a multifactorial approach in the study of the food selection process in herbivores.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+
from £29.99 /Month
  • Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
  • Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
  • Cancel anytime
View plans

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • AOAC (1984) Official methods of analysis, 13th edn. Association of Official Analytical Chemistry, Arlington, Pa

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchsbaum R, Valiela I, Swain T (1984) The role of phenolic compounds and other plant constituents in feeding by Canada geese in a coastal marsh. Oecologia 63: 343–349

    Google Scholar 

  • Choinière L, Gauthier G (1995) Energetics of reproduction in female and male greater snow geese. Oecologia (in press)

  • Gauthier G (1993) Feeding ecology of nesting greater snow geese. J Wildl Manage 57: 216–223

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauthier G, Bédard J (1990) The role of nutrients and phenolic compounds in determining food preference in greater snow geese. Oecologia 84: 553–558

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauthier G, Bédard J (1991) Experimental tests of the palatability of forage plants in greater snow geese. J Appl Ecol 28: 491–500

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauthier G, Huot J, Picard G (1991) Evaluation of the detergent fiber method. J Wildl Manage 55: 347–354

    Google Scholar 

  • Goering HK, Van Soest PJ (1970) Forage fiber analyses (apparatus, reagent, procedures and some applications). (US Department of Agriculture Handbook No. 379) USDA, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harwood J (1977) Summer feeding ecology of lesser snow geese. J Wildl Manage 41: 48–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes RJ, Gauthier G, Reed A (1994) Summer habitat use and behaviour of greater snow geese. Wildfowl 45: 49–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Jakubas WJ, Karasov WH, Guglielmo CG (1993) Coniferyl benzoate in quaking aspen (Populus tremuloides): its effect on energy and nitrogen digestion and retention in ruffed grouse (Bonasa umbellus). Physiol Zool 66: 580–601

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen M (1978) Food selection in geese. Verh Ornithol Ges Bayern 23: 169–176

    Google Scholar 

  • Palo RT (1984) Distribution of birch (Betula spp), willow (Salix spp) and poplar (Populus spp) secondary metabolites and their potential roles as chemical defence against herbivores. J Chem Ecol 10: 499–520

    Google Scholar 

  • Palo RT (1985) Chemical defense in birch: inhibition of digestibility in ruminants by phenolic extracts. Oecologia 68: 10–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Prop J, Vulink T (1992) Digestion by barnacle geese in the annual cycle: the interplay between retention time and food quality. Funct Ecol 6: 180–189

    Google Scholar 

  • Prop J, Eerden MR van, Drent RH (1984) Reproductive success of the barnacle goose Branta leucopsis in relation to food exploitation on the breeding grounds, western Spitsbergen. Nor Polarinst Skr 181: 87–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins CT, Hanley TA, Hagerman AE, Hjeljord O, Baker DL, Schwartz CC, Mautz WW (1987) Role of tannins in defending plants against ruminants: reduction in protein availability. Ecology 68: 98–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Sauvesty A, Page F, Huot J (1992) A simple method for extracting plant phenolic compounds. Can J For Res 22: 654–659

    Google Scholar 

  • Sedinger JS, White RG, Mann FE, Burris FA, Kedrowski RA (1989) Apparent metabolizability of alfalfa components by yearling Pacific Black Brant. J Wildl Manage 53: 726–734

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair ARE, Krebs CJ, Smith JNM (1982) Diet quality and food limitation in herbivores: the case of the snowshoe hare. Can J Zool 60: 889–897

    Google Scholar 

  • Tahvanainen J, Helle E, Julkunen-Tiitto R, Lavola A (1985) Phenolic compounds of willow bark as deterrents against feeding by mountain hare. Oecologia 65: 319–323

    Google Scholar 

  • Ydenberg RC, Prins HHTh (1981) Spring grazing and the manipulation of food quality by barnacle geese. J Appl Ecol 18: 443–453

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gauthier, G., John Hughes, R. The palatability of Arctic willow for greater snow geese: the role of nutrients and deterring factors. Oecologia 103, 390–392 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00328629

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00328629

Key words