Abstract
Little is known about how sexual victimization may affect a woman’s self-reported personality ratings. In the present study endorsement ratings of gendered attributes, as measured by the Extended Personal Attributes Questionnaire, were examined over a 3-year span using multiple group latent growth modeling. Differences in the endorsement of gendered attributes between college female non-victims (N = 158) and victims (N = 158) of sexual aggression were tested. Whereas endorsement of communal and positive agentic attributes were stable across time, victims remained consistently less traditionally feminine (i.e., positively communal and nurturing) than non-victims. Victims also appeared to become relatively more self-focused (i.e., negative masculinity) across time than non-victims. This pattern suggests that sexual victimization may have lasting effects on victims’ ability to focus on the nurturing, trusting aspects of relationships; rather they have a preoccupation with their own needs and goals that appears to strengthen with time. Such a pattern sheds insight into how self-processes may contribute to the relationship difficulties often observed in sexual assault victims. Implications of these results for both personality and sexual aggression researchers are discussed.
Access this article
We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.
Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
It would be very interesting to examine the effect of sexual victimization on the endorsement of gendered attributes for those women who were first victimized in college (i.e. during the time frame of this study). However, only 24 women were victimized for the first time during their first year of college, and only 18 were first victimized during their second year of college. Although the authors understand the importance of these groups, we are not confident that longitudinal analyses on such a small sample would be reliable.
Individuals familiar with confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) may notice the resemblance between the model represented in Fig. 1 and a standard CFA model. In fact, the LGM described above is a special parameterization of the standard CFA model (Meredith & Tisak 1990). Given that LGMs, like CFAs, can be tested within the SEM framework, all extensions of general SEM can be made to LGM. This includes multiple group analysis.
It is important to note that the omnibus test of Model 4 may fail even though the model passes all previous individual tests. This is due to the restrictive nature of the omnibus test compared to the series of individual tests. Any discrepancies found between Model 4 and previous models are discussed.
A 2 (victimization) × 3 (time) ANOVA was also performed on the data. The results obtained with the LGM analysis were supported with the results of the ANOVAs. In addition, results of the ANOVAs showed that assumptions of the ANOVA were violated (equal variances), which supports our decision not to utilize this analysis.
References
Abele, A. E. (2003). The dynamics of masculine-agentic and feminine-communal traits: Findings from a prospective study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 768–776.
Arbuckle, J. L. (1999). Amos user’s guide. Chicago, IL: Smallwaters Corporation.
Bakan, D. (1966). The duality of human existence: An essay on psychology and religion. Chicago: Rand McNally.
Bartz, J. A., & Lydon, J. E. (2004). Close relationships and the working self-concept: Implicit and explicit effects of priming attachment on agency and communion. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 1389–1401.
Bem, S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 155–162.
Bollen, K. A. (1989a). Structural equation modeling with latent variables. New York: Wiley.
Bollen, K. A. (1989b). A new incremental fit index for general structural equation models. Sociological Methods & Research, 17, 303–316.
Browne, A., & Finkelhor, D. (1986). Impact of child sexual abuse: A review of the research. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 66–77.
Burke, P. J., & Hoelter, J. (1989). Identity and sex-race differences in educational and occupational aspirations formation. Social Science Research, 17, 29–47.
Burke, P. J., Stets, J. E., & Pirog-Good, M. A. (1989). Gender identity, self-esteem, and physical and sexual abuse in dating relationships. In M. A. Pirog-Good & J. E. Stets (Eds.), Violence in dating relationships: Emerging social issues (pp. 72–93). Westport, CT: Greenwood.
Burt, M. R. (1980). Cultural myths and supports for rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 217–230.
Carrig, M. M., Wirth, R. J., & Curran, P. J. (2004). A SAS macro for estimating and visualizing individual growth curves. Structural Equation Modeling, 11, 132–149.
Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1980). Still stable after all of these years: Personalty as a key to some issues in adulthood and old age. In P. B. Baltes & O. G. Brim, Jr. (Eds.), Life span development and behavior (Vol. 3, pp. 65–102). New York: Academic.
Diener, E., & Diener, C. (1996). Most people are happy. Psychological Science, 7, 181–185.
Fan, X. (2003). Power of latent growth modeling for detecting group differences in linear growth trajectory parameters. Structural Equation Modeling, 10, 380–400.
Gleason, W. J. (1993). Mental disorders in battered women: An empirical study. Violence and Victims, 8, 53–68.
Gough, H. G., & Bradley, P. (1996). California personality inventory manual. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists.
Helgeson, V. S. (1994). Relation of agency and communion to well-being: Evidence and potential explanations. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 412–428.
Helmreich, R. L., Spence, J. T., & Wilhelm, J. A. (1981). A psychometric analysis of the Personal Attributes Questionnaire. Sex Roles, 7, 1097–1107.
Helson, R., Jones, C., & Kwan, V. S. Y. (2002). Personality change over 40 years of adulthood: Hierarchical linear modeling analysis of two longitudinal samples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 752–766.
Himelein, M. J. (1995). Risk factors for sexual victimization in dating: A longitudinal study of college women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 19, 31–148.
Humphrey, J. A., & White, J. W. (2000). Women’s vulnerability to sexual assault from adolescence to young adulthood. Journal of Adolescent Health, 27, 419–424.
Kendall-Tackett, K. A., Williams, L. M., & Finkelhor, D. (1993). Impact of sexual abuse on children: A review and synthesis of recent empirical studies. Psychological Bulletin, 113, 164–180.
Kilpatrick, D. G., Acierno, R., Saunders, B., Resnick, H. S., Best, C. C., & Schnurr, P. P. (2000). Risk factors for adolescent substance abuse and dependence: Data from a national sample. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68, 19–30.
Koss, M. P., & Dinero, T. E. (1989). Discriminant analysis of risk factors for sexual victimization among a national sample of college women. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 57, 242–250.
Koss, M. P., Figueredo, A. J., Bell, I., Tharan, M., & Tromp, S. (1996). Rape, traumatic memory, and physical symptoms among employed women: A cross validated structural model. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 105, 1–12.
Koss, M. P., & Gidycz, C. A. (1989). Sexual experiences survey: Reliability and validity. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 53, 422–423.
Koss, M. P., Gidycz, C. A., & Wisniewski, N. (1987). The scope of rape: Incidence and prevalence of sexual aggression and victimization in a national sample of higher education students. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 58, 162–170.
McCauley, J., Kern, D. E., Kolodner, K., Dill, L., Schroeder, A. F., DeChant, H. K., et al. (1995). The “battering syndrome:” Prevalence and clinical characteristics of domestic violence in primary care internal practices. Annals of Internal Medicine, 123, 737–746.
Meredith, W. (1993). Measurement invariance, factor analysis, and factor invariance. Psychometrika, 58, 525–544.
Meredith, W., & Tisak, J. (1984, July). “Tuckerizing” curves. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society, Santa Barbara, CA.
Meredith, W., & Tisak, J. (1990). Latent curve analysis. Psychometrika, 55, 107–122.
Muehlenhard, C. L., & Linton, M. A. (1987). Date rape and sexual aggression in dating situations: Incidence and risk factors. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 34, 186–196.
Murnen, S. K., & Byrne, D. (1991). Hyperfemininity: Measurement and initial validation of the construct. Journal of Sex Research, 28, 479–489.
Myers, M. B., Templer, D. I., & Brown, R. (1984). Coping ability of women who become victims of rape. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 52, 73–78.
Plitcha, S. B. (1996). Violence and abuse: Implications for women’s health. In M. M. Falik & K. S. Collins (Eds.), Women’s health: The Commonwealth Fund survey (pp. 237–270). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Sarkar, N. N., & Sarkar, R. (2005). Sexual assault on woman: Its impact on her life and living in society. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 20, 407–419.
Smith, P. H., Edwards, G., & DeVellis, R. (1998, November). Intimate partner violence: Prevalence, co-occurrence, and health implications. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Public Health Association, Washington, DC.
Smith, P. H., White, J. W., & Holland, L. J. (2003). A longitudinal perspective on dating violence among adolescent and college-age women. American Journal of Public Health, 93, 1104–1109.
Spence, J. T. (1984). Masculinity, femininity, and gender-related traits: A conceptual analysis and critique of current research. In B. A. Maher & W. B. Maher (Eds.), Progress in experimental personality research (Vol. 13, pp 1–97). San Diego, CA: Academic.
Spence, J. T., & Helmreich, R. L. (1980). Masculine instrumentality and feminine expressiveness: Their relationships with sex role attitudes and behaviors. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 5, 147–163.
Spence, J. T., Helmreich, R. L., & Holahan, C. K. (1979). Negative and positive components of psychological masculinity and femininity and their relationships to self-reports of neurotic and acting out behaviors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1673–1682.
Spence, J. T., Helmreich, R., & Stapp, J. (1974). The Personal Attributes Questionnaire: A measure of sex role stereotypes and masculinity-femininity. Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 4, 43.
Spence, J. T., Losoff, M., & Robbins, A. S. (1991). Sexually aggressive tactics in dating relationships: Personality and attitudinal correlates. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 10, 289–304.
Steiger, J. H., & Lind, J. C. (1980, May). Statistically-based tests for the number of common factors. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society, Iowa City, IO.
Stryker, S. (1980). Symbolic interactionism: A social structural version. Menlo Park, CA: Cummings.
Tucker, L. R., & Lewis, C. (1979). A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 38, 1–10.
Twenge, J. M. (1997). Changes in masculine and feminine traits over time: A meta-analysis. Sex Roles, 36, 305–325.
US Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics (1995). Violence against women: Estimates from the redesigned survey. (National Crime Victimization Survey). Washington, DC: Author.
US Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statisticsa (1998). National crime victimization survey. Washington, DC: Author.
White, J. W., & Humphrey, J. A. (1997). A longitudinal approach to the study of sexual assault. In M. Schwartz (Ed.), Researching sexual violence against women (pp. 22–42). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Woodhill, B. M., & Samuels, C. A. (2003). Positive and negative androgyny and their relationship with psychological health and well-being. Sex Roles, 48, 555–565.
Yanico, B. J. (1985). BSRI scores: Stability over four years for college women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 9, 277–283.
Yoder, J. D., Rice, R. W., Adams, J., Priest, R. F., & Prince, H. T. (1982). Reliability of the Attitudes Toward Women Scale (AWS) and the Personal Attributes Questionnaire (PAQ). Sex Roles, 8, 651–657.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This work was supported by grants no. MH5083 from the National Institute of Mental Health and no. 98-WT-VX-0010 from the National Institute of Justice awarded to the third author.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
McMullin, D., Wirth, R.J. & White, J.W. The Impact of Sexual Victimization on Personality: A Longitudinal Study of Gendered Attributes. Sex Roles 56, 403–414 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-006-9179-8
Published:
Issue date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-006-9179-8