Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to link.springer.com

Skip to main content
Log in

Recovery of copper through decontamination of synthetic solutions using modified barks

  • Published:
Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Decontamination of synthetic acetate, chloride, nitrate, and sulfate solutions containing 10, 100, 1,000, 10,000, and 50,000 ppm of copper using chemically treated barks has been studied. Metal percentage removal from solutions depends on the pH, the initial concentration, and, to some extent, the anion. It varies from 40 through 99 pct of the initial metallic ion’s content in the solution. The average retention capacity of the treated bark is about 43 mg of Cu/g of dry modified bark (0.68 mmole/g of dry bark). Extraction of copper cations from the saturated modified bark was made possible with dilute acid. Regeneration of bark for reuse as an ion exchanger was possible. Bark loaded with copper was analyzed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and infrared (IR) spectroscopy. Copper was uniformly distributed in the bulk of the bark. No copper segregation was observed. It seems that copper was bound to the acidic (phenolic) sites of the bark. Anions were not detected on the copper-loaded bark with either SEM electron probe microanalysis or IR spectroscopy. Incineration of the bark loaded with copper resulted in ashes containing about 77 pct of copper oxides, while pyrolysis of the same sample led to ashes containing 10 pct of metallic copper and about 85 pct carbon.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+
from £29.99 /Month
  • Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
  • Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
  • Cancel anytime
View plans

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. U. Förstner and G.T.W. Wittmann: Metal Pollution in the Aquatic Environment, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  2. I.H. Scheinberg: in Metals and Their Compounds in the Environment, VCH, Weinheim, 1991, pp. 893–909.

    Google Scholar 

  3. S.E. Dahlgren and W.H. Hartford: Holzforschung, 1972, vol. 26 (2), pp. 62–69.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Anonymous: Mémento Technique de l’eau Tome 1, Lavoisier, Paris, 1989, p. 594.

  5. E. Adler: Wood Sci. Technol., 1977, vol. 11, pp. 169–218.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. I. Gaballah, D. Goy, and G. Kilbertus: in Residues and Effluents, Processing and Environmental Considerations, R.C. Reddy, W.P. Imerie, and P.B. Queneau, eds., TMS, Warrendale, PA, 1991, pp. 475–87.

    Google Scholar 

  7. I. Gaballah, D. Goy, G. Kilbertus, B. Loubinoux, and J. Thauront: in EPD Congress 1993, J.P. Hager, ed., TMS, Warrendale, PA, 1992, pp. 57–70.

    Google Scholar 

  8. I. Gaballah, D. Goy, G. Kilbertus, and J. Thauront: Resources, Conservation Recycling, 1994, pp. 97–106.

  9. I. Gaballah, D. Goy, G. Kilbertus, B. Loubinoux, and J. Thauront: in EPD Congress 1994, Garry W. Warren, ed., TMS, Warrendale, PA, 1994, pp. 33–42.

    Google Scholar 

  10. I. Gaballah, D. Goy, G. Kilbertus, and J. Thauront: in EPD Congress 1994, Garry W. Warren, ed., TMS, Warrendale, PA, 1994, pp. 43–52.

    Google Scholar 

  11. I. Gaballah and G. Kilbertus: in Separation Processes, M. Misra, ed., TMS, Warrendale, PA, 1995, pp. 15–26.

    Google Scholar 

  12. A.C. Waiss, Jr., J.A. Kuhnle, and M.E. Wiley: U.S. Patent No 3,719,473, Mar. 3, 1973.

  13. J. Freer, J. Baeza, H. Maturana, G. Palma, and N. Duran: J. Chem. Tech. Biotechnol., 1989, vol. 46, pp. 41–48.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. J.M. Randall, R.L. Bermann, V. Garret, and A.C. Waiss, Jr.: For. Prod. J., 1974, vol. 24 (9), pp. 80–84.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. J.M. Randall, E. Hautala, A.C. Waiss, Jr., and J.L. Tschernitz: For. Prod. J., 1976, vol. 26 (8), pp. 46–50.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. J.M. Randall: For. Prod. J., 1977, vol. 27 (11), pp. 51–56.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. L.K. Korovin, M.A. Evilevich, and G.A. Voronchikhin: Bum. Prom.-st., 1982, No. 7, pp. 27–28.

  18. R.R. Sharifov, F.Yu Ibadullaev, and L.A. Mamed’yarova: Izv. VUZOV, Stroit. Arkhit., 1988, vol. 6, pp. 106–09.

    Google Scholar 

  19. D.S. Bhargava, M.S. Gupta, and B.S. Varshney: Asian Environ., 1987, vol. 9 (4), pp. 29–37.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. A.M. Deshkar and S.D. Dara: Asian Environ., 1988, vol. 10 (4), pp. 3–11.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. P. Kumar and S.S. Dara: Chem. Era, 1979, vol. 15 (11), pp. 20–23.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. P. Kumar and S.S. Dara: Prog. Water Technol., 1980, vol. 13, pp. 353–61.

    Google Scholar 

  23. P. Kumar and S.S. Dara: Ind. J. Environ. Health, 1980, vol. 22 (3), pp. 196–202.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. V. Kumar and R.S. Sindhu: Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. India. Sect. B, 1985, vol. 55 (1), pp. 94–95.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. H.C.P. Srivastava, R.P. Mathur, and I. Mehrotra: Environ. Technol. Lett., 1986, vol. (1), pp. 55–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kumar Pawan and S.S. Dara: Agricultural Wastes, 1982, vol. 4, pp. 213–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. M. Morita, M. Higuchi, and I. Sakata: J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 1987, vol. 34 (3), pp. 1013–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. R. Suemitsu, M. Osako, and N. Tagiri: Sci. Eng. Doshisha Univ., 1986, vol. 27 (1), pp. 41–48.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. M. Fujii, S.I. Shioya, and A. Ito: Holzforschung, 1988, vol. 42 (5), pp. 295–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. V.J. Larsen and H.H. Schierup: J. Environ. Qual., 1981, vol. 10 (2), pp. 188–93.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. R.W. Henderson, D.S. Andrews, G.R. Lightsey, and N.A. Poonawala: Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol., 1977, vol. 17 (3), pp. 355–59.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. J.M. Randall, E. Hautala, and A.C. Weiss, Jr.: Proc. Miner. Waste Util. Symp., 4th, 1974, pp. 329–34.

  33. M.S. Masri, F. William, and F. Mendel: J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 1974, vol. 18 (3), pp. 675–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. D.S. Belford, C.D. Cook, E.H. Nevard, and R.D. Preston: Nature, 1959, vol. 183, p. 988.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. E.E. Flomina: Izv. Vyssh. Uched. Zaved., Les. Zh., 1967, vol. 10 (6), pp. 118–22.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. E.E. Flomina: Nauch. Tr., Tsent. Nauch.-Issled. Inst. Mekh. Obrad. Drev., 1969, vol. 2 (24), pp. 24–36.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. D.V. Plackett, E.W. Ainscough, and A.M. Brodie: Document No. IRG/WP/3423, 18 th Annual Meeting of the International Research Group on Wood Preservation, Honey Harbour, Ontario, Canada, 5/1987, 11 pages.

  38. C.H. Bayley and G.R.F. Rose: Nature, 1960, vol. 185, pp. 313–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. D.E. Bland: Nature, 1963, vol. 200 (4903), p. 267.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. G.A. Peters and N. Parameswaran: Wood Sci. Technol., 1980, vol. 14, pp. 81–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. A. Pizzi: J. Polym. Sci., Polym. Chem. Ed., 1982, vol. 20 (3), pp. 707–24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. D. Goy: Ph.D. Thesis, INPL, Vandœuvre, France, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  43. S. Yata, J. Mukudai, and H. Kajita: Mokuzai Gakkaishi, 1979, vol. 25 (3), pp. 171–176.

    Google Scholar 

  44. K.G. Ryan and J.A. Drysdale: J. Inst. Wood Sci., 1988, vol. 11 (3), pp. 108–13.

    Google Scholar 

  45. I. Gaballah, D. Goy, G. Kilbertus, and J. Thauront: International Patent No. WO 92 15397, September 17, 1992.

  46. P. Chanrion and A. Davesne: La Valorisation des Produits Connexes du Bois, Centre Technique du Bois et de l’Ameublement, Paris, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  47. S. Chow, S.E. Corder, R.W. Kennedy, L.J. Porter, and H.E. Wahlgren, 1976, Proceedings of XVI International Union of Forest Research Organizations World Congress, Division V, Published by the Norwegian IUFRO Congress Committee, Norway, pp. 125–35.

    Google Scholar 

  48. D. Fengel and G. Wegener: Wood, Chemistry, Ultrastructure, Reactions, De Gruyter, Berlin.

  49. FAO Forest Collection No. 25, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, 1992.

  50. B. Loubinoux and H. Malek: Holzforschung, 1992, 46 (6), pp. 537–39.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. B. Loubinoux, H. Malek, J.P. Joly, and G. Kilbertus: For. Prod. J., 1992, vol. 42 (10), pp. 55–58.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. H.L. Hergert: in Lignins, Occurrence, Formation, Structure and Reactions, Wiley Interscience, New York, NY, 1971, pp. 267–93.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gaballah, I., Goy, D., Allain, E. et al. Recovery of copper through decontamination of synthetic solutions using modified barks. Metall Mater Trans B 28, 13–23 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11663-997-0122-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11663-997-0122-3

Keywords