Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to link.springer.com

Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in
Menu
Find a journal Publish with us Track your research
Search
Cart
  1. Home
  2. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers
  3. Article

A nonlinear regression approach to estimating signal detection models for rating data

  • Published: May 2001
  • Volume 33, pages 108–114, (2001)
  • Cite this article
Download PDF
Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers Aims and scope Submit manuscript
A nonlinear regression approach to estimating signal detection models for rating data
Download PDF
  • Ching-Fan Sheu1 &
  • Andrew Heathcote2 
  • 732 Accesses

  • 7 Citations

  • 3 Altmetric

  • Explore all metrics

Abstract

This paper considers a regression approach to estimating signal detection parameters for rating data. The methodology is based on the statistical modeling of ordinal data and requires only standard statistical software such as SAS (SAS/STAT User’s Guide, 1999) for computation. The approach is more efficient than the current practice of extracting the parameter estimates with the use of specialized software and analyzing the estimates with the use of a standard statisticalpackage. It greatly facilitate s exploration of the effects of covariates on model parameters. The method is illustrated using a published data set from a single factor multiple-alternative perceptual task, and data from a more complex factorial design examining recognition memory rating data.

Article PDF

Download to read the full article text

Similar content being viewed by others

Signal and Parameter Estimation

Chapter © 2016

Rank-one multi-reference factor analysis

Article 12 January 2021

Sparse Multi-Reference Alignment: Phase Retrieval, Uniform Uncertainty Principles and the Beltway Problem

Article 01 August 2022

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, books and news in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.
  • Applied Statistics
  • Linear Models and Regression
  • Non-parametric Inference
  • Statistical Learning
  • Statistical Theory and Methods
  • Statistics
Use our pre-submission checklist

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

References

  • Agresti, A. (1996).An introductionto categorical data analysis. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartholomew, D. J. (1959). A test of homogeneity for ordered alternatives.Biometrika,46, 36–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bollen, K. A. (1989).Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, C. (1984). Generalized linear models—the missing link.Applied Statistics,33, 18–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeCarlo, L. T. (1998). Signal detection theory and generalized linear models.Psychological Methods,3, 186–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dorfman, D. D., &Alf, E. (1969). Maximum-likelihood estimation of parameters of signal detection theory and determination of confidence intervals—rating-method data.Journal of Mathematical Psychology,6, 487–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, D. M., &Swets, J. A. (1974).Signal detection theory and psychophysics. Huntington, New York: Krieger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jennrich, R. I., & Moore, R. H. (1975). Maximum likelihood estimation by means of nonlinear least squares.Proceedings of the Statistical Computing Section of the American Statistical Association, pp. 57–65.

  • Joreskog, K. G., &Sörbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8.14. Chicago: Scientific Software International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kang Fu, V. (1998). Estimating generalized ordered logit models.Stata Technical Bulletin,44, 27–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kijewski, M. F., Swensson, R. G., &Judy, P. F. (1989). Analysis of rating data from multiple-alternative tasks.Journal of Mathematical Psychology,33, 423–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacMillan, N. A., &Creelman, G. D. (1991).Detection theory: A user’s guide. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAuley, M.,& Heathcote, A. (1999).Psycholinguistic properties and the mirror effect: More than one cause? Poster session presented at the Australian Experimental Psychology Conference, Sydney.

  • McCullagh, P., &Nelder, J. A. (1989).Generalized linear models. New York: Chapman & Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ratcliff, R., McKoon, G., &Tindall, M. (1994). Empirical generality of data from recognition memory receiver-operating characteristic functions and implication for the global memory models.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,20, 763–785.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ratcliff, R., Sheu, C.-E., &Gronlund, S. D. (1992). Testing global memory models using ROC curves.Psychological Review,99, 518–535.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute, Inc. (1999).SAS/STAT User’s Guide (Version 8). Cary, NC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tosteson, A. A., &Begg, C. B. (1988). A general regression methodology for ROC curve estimation.Medical Decision Making,8, 204–215.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, DePaul University, 2219 North Kenmore Ave., 60614-3522, Chicago, IL

    Ching-Fan Sheu

  2. University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia

    Andrew Heathcote

Authors
  1. Ching-Fan Sheu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Andrew Heathcote
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ching-Fan Sheu.

Additional information

This work was supported in part by a paid-leave program from the University Research Council of DePaul University to C.-F. Sheu and partly by a research visitor grant from the University of Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sheu, CF., Heathcote, A. A nonlinear regression approach to estimating signal detection models for rating data. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 33, 108–114 (2001). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195355

Download citation

  • Received: 24 November 2000

  • Accepted: 13 March 2001

  • Issue date: May 2001

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195355

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Word Condition
  • Location Shift
  • Proc NLIN
  • Nonlinear Regression Program
  • Global Memory Model
Use our pre-submission checklist

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

Advertisement

Search

Navigation

  • Find a journal
  • Publish with us
  • Track your research

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Books A-Z

Publish with us

  • Journal finder
  • Publish your research
  • Language editing
  • Open access publishing

Products and services

  • Our products
  • Librarians
  • Societies
  • Partners and advertisers

Our brands

  • Springer
  • Nature Portfolio
  • BMC
  • Palgrave Macmillan
  • Apress
  • Discover
  • Your US state privacy rights
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms and conditions
  • Privacy policy
  • Help and support
  • Legal notice
  • Cancel contracts here

132.145.61.108

Not affiliated

Springer Nature

© 2025 Springer Nature