Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to link.springer.com

Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in
Menu
Find a journal Publish with us Track your research
Search
Cart
  1. Home
  2. Memory & Cognition
  3. Article

First in, first out: Word learning age and spoken word frequency as predictors of word familiarity and word naming latency

  • Published: May 1987
  • Volume 15, pages 208–216, (1987)
  • Cite this article
Download PDF
Memory & Cognition Aims and scope Submit manuscript
First in, first out: Word learning age and spoken word frequency as predictors of word familiarity and word naming latency
Download PDF
  • Gordon D. A. Brown1 &
  • Frances L. Watson2 
  • 3542 Accesses

  • 281 Citations

  • Explore all metrics

Abstract

This study is concerned with recent claims that subjective measures of word frequency are more suitable than are standard word frequency counts as indices of actual frequency of word encounter. A multiple regression study is reported, which shows that the major predictor of familiarity ratings is word learning age. Objective measures of spoken and written word frequency made independent contributions to the variance. It is concluded that rated familiarity is not an appropriate substitute for objective frequency measures. A multiple regression study of word naming latency is reported, and shows that rated word learning age is a better predictor of word naming latency than are spoken word frequency, written word frequency, rated familiarity, and other variables. Possible theoretical explanations for age-of-acquisition effects are discussed and it is concluded that early-learned words have a more complete representation in a phonological output lexicon. This conclusion is related to relevant developmental literature.

Article PDF

Download to read the full article text

Similar content being viewed by others

How well do word recognition measures correlate? Effects of language context and repeated presentations

Article 12 November 2018

Predictors of word writing in Spanish and Arabic among 6- and 7-year-old children

Article Open access 30 November 2024

Two words as one: A multi-naming investigation of the age-of-acquisition effect in compound-word processing

Article Open access 21 November 2019

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, books and news in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.
  • Long-term Memory
  • Language and Youth
  • Language Processing
  • Predictive markers
  • Semantic Memory
  • Speech Perception
Use our pre-submission checklist

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

References

  • Aitchison, J., &Straf, M. (1982). Lexical storage and retrieval: A developing skill? In A. Cutler (Ed.),Slips of the tongue and language production (pp. 197–241). Amsterdam: Mouton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balota, D. A., &Chumbley, J. I. (1984). Are lexical decisions a good measnre of lexical access? The role of word frequency in the neglected decision stageJournal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,10, 340–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balota, D. A., &Chumbley, J. I. (1985). The locus of word frequency effects in the pronunciation task: Lexical access and/or production?Journal of Memory & Lanugage,24, 89–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, G. D. A. (1984). A frequency count of 190,000 words in theLondon-Lund Corpus of English Conversation.Journal of Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,16, 502–532.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, J. B., &White, M. N. (1973). Word frequency and age of acquisition as determiners of picture-naming latency.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,25, 85–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cutler, A. (1981). Making up materials is a confounded nuisance, or: Will we be able to run any psycholinguistic experiments at all in 1990?Cognition,10, 65–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Farwell, C. B. (1976).Some strategies in the early production of fricatives. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Linguistics Department.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fay, D., &Cutler, A. (1977). Malapropisms and the structure of the mental lexicon.Linguistic Inquiry,8, 505–520.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, C. A., &Farwell, C. B. (1975). Words and sounds in early language acquisition.Language,51, 431–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith, R. C., &Underwood, B. J. (1973). Perceived frequency of abstract and concrete words.Memory & Cognition,1, 56–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gernsbacher, M. A. (1984). Resolving 20 years of inconsistent interactions betw~n lexical familiarity and orthography, concreteness, and polysemy.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,113, 256–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilhooly, K. J. (1984). Word age-of-acquisition and residence time in lexical memory as factors m word naming.Current Psychological Research & Reviews,3, 24–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilhooly, K. J., &Gilhooly, M. L. M. (1979). Age-of-acquisition effects in lex~cal and episodic memory tasks.Memory & Cognition,7, 214–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilhooly, K. J., &Gilhooly, M. L. M. (1980). The validity of ageof-acquisition ratings.British Journal of Psychology,71, 105–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilhooly, K. J., &Logie, R. H. (1980). Age-of-acquisition, imagery, concreteness, fanfiliarity, and ambiguity measures for 1944 words.Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation,12, 395–427.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilhooly, K J., &Logie, R. H. (1981). Word age-of-acquisition, readmg latencics and auditory recognition.Current Psychological Research,1, 251–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilhooly, K. J., &Watson, F. L. (1981). Word age-of-acquisition effects: A review.Current Psychological Reviews,1, 269–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, B. (1985). Subjective frequency and the lexical decision latency function: Implications for mechanisms of lexical access.Journal of Memory & Language,24, 631–645.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howis, D. (1954). On the interpretation of word frequency as a variable affecting speed of recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology,48, 106–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys, G. W., Evett, L. J., &Taylor, D. E. (1982). Automat~ c phonological priming in visual word recognition.Memory & Cognition,10, 576–590.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jakobson, R. (1968).Child language aphasia and phonological universals. The Hague: Mouton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kučera, H., &Francis, W. (1967).Computational analysis of presentday American English. Providence, RI: rown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lachman, R., Shaffer, J. P., &Hennrikus, D. (1974). Language and cognition: Effects of stimulus codability, name-word frequency and age of acquisition on lexical reaction time.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,13, 613–625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyons, A. W., Teer, P., &Rubenstein, H. (1978). Age-at-acquisition and word recognition.Journal of Psycholinguistic Research,7, 179–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menn, L. (1983). Development of speaking skills. In B. Butterworth (Ed.),Language production 2. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morton, J., &Smith, N. V. (1974). Some ideas concerning the acquisition of phonology. InCurrent problems in psycholinguistics (pp. 161–176). Paris: Editions du CRNS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris, D. (1984). A computer-based programmable tachistoscope for nonprogrammers.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers.16, 25–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, D. C (1976). Applying psychometric methods in linguistic research: Some recent advances,Linguistics,168, 63–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, D. C. (1980). 51 properties of 125 words: A unit analysis of verbal behaviorJournal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,19, 736–755.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, D. C. (1983). Associative asymmetry, avallabdity, and retrieval.Memory & Cognition,11, 83–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, N. V. (1973).The acquisition of phonology: A case study Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solso, R. L., &Juel, C. L. (1980). Positional frequency and versatility of bigrams for two- through nine-letter English words.Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation,12, 297–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svartvik, J., &Quirk, R. (1980).A corpus of English conversation Lurid, Sweden: Gleerup.

    Google Scholar 

  • Theios, J., &Muise, J. G. (1977). The word identification process in reading. In N. J. Castellan, D. B. Pisoni, & G. R. Potts (Eds.),Cognitive theory. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaurm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorndike, E. L., &Lorge, I. (1944).The teacher’s word book of 30,000 words New York: Teachers College Press, Columbm University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tryk, H. E. (1968) Sublectwescalmgot word frequency.American Journal of Psychology,81, 170–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vihman, M. M. (1981). Phonology and the development of the lexicon. Evidence from children’s errors.Journal of Child Language,8, 239–264.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Watsom, F. L. (1985).Age of acquisition effects tn lexical processing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Aberdeen, Scotland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whaley, C. P. (1978). Word-nonword classification time.Journal of Verbal Learning& Verbal Behavior,17, 143–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Language and Linguistics, University of Essex, CO4 3SQ, Colchester, England

    Gordon D. A. Brown

  2. M.R.C. Applied Psychology Unit, Cambridge, England

    Frances L. Watson

Authors
  1. Gordon D. A. Brown
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Frances L. Watson
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

The experiments reported in this paper were carded out at the University of Sussex.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brown, G.D.A., Watson, F.L. First in, first out: Word learning age and spoken word frequency as predictors of word familiarity and word naming latency. Memory & Cognition 15, 208–216 (1987). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197718

Download citation

  • Received: 26 February 1985

  • Accepted: 20 October 1986

  • Issue date: May 1987

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197718

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Lexical Decision
  • Word Frequency
  • Word Naming
  • Bigram Frequency
  • Initial Phoneme
Use our pre-submission checklist

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

Advertisement

Search

Navigation

  • Find a journal
  • Publish with us
  • Track your research

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Books A-Z

Publish with us

  • Journal finder
  • Publish your research
  • Language editing
  • Open access publishing

Products and services

  • Our products
  • Librarians
  • Societies
  • Partners and advertisers

Our brands

  • Springer
  • Nature Portfolio
  • BMC
  • Palgrave Macmillan
  • Apress
  • Discover
  • Your US state privacy rights
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms and conditions
  • Privacy policy
  • Help and support
  • Legal notice
  • Cancel contracts here

132.145.61.108

Not affiliated

Springer Nature

© 2025 Springer Nature