Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to link.springer.com

Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in
Menu
Find a journal Publish with us Track your research
Search
Cart
  1. Home
  2. Memory & Cognition
  3. Article

An analysis of latency and interresponse time in free recall

  • Published: September 1994
  • Volume 22, pages 511–524, (1994)
  • Cite this article
Download PDF
Memory & Cognition Aims and scope Submit manuscript
An analysis of latency and interresponse time in free recall
Download PDF
  • Doug Rohrer1 &
  • John T. Wixted1 
  • 1828 Accesses

  • 146 Citations

  • 3 Altmetric

  • Explore all metrics

Abstract

In four experiments, subjects freely recalled previously studied items while a voice key and computer recorded each item’s recall latency relative to the onset of the recall period. The measures of recall probability and mean recall latency were shown to be empirically independent, demonstrating that there exists no a priori relationship between the two. In all four experiments, latency distributions were fit well by the ex-Gaussian, suggesting that retrieval includes a brief normally distributed initiation stage followed by a longer exponentially distributed search stage. Further, the variation in mean latency stemmed from the variation in the duration of the search stage, not the initiation stage. Interresponse times (IRTs), the time elapsed between two successive item recalls, were analyzed as well. The growth of mean IRTs, plotted as a function of output position, was shown to be a simple function of the number of items not yet recalled. Finally, the mathematical nature of both free recall latency and IRT growth are shown to be consistent with a simple theoretical account of retrieval that depicts mean recall latency as a measure of the breadth of search.

Article PDF

Download to read the full article text

Similar content being viewed by others

Individual differences in working memory capacity and search efficiency

Article 29 May 2018

Impact of process interference on memory encoding and retrieval processes in dual-task situations

Article Open access 04 March 2024

Multiple high-reward items can be prioritized in working memory but with greater vulnerability to interference

Article 02 July 2018

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, books and news in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.
  • Long-term Memory
  • Episodic Memory
  • Semantic Memory
  • Site-Specific Performance
  • Working Memory
  • Information Storage and Retrieval
Use our pre-submission checklist

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

References

  • Albert, D. (1968). Freies Reproduzieren von Wortreihen als stochastische Entleerung eines Speichers [Free recall of word sequences as stochastic depletion of storage].Zeitschrift für experimentelle und angewandte Psychologie,15, 564–581.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ashby, F. G. (1982). Testing the assumptions of exponential, additive reaction time models.Memory & Cognition,10, 125–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, R. C., &Juola, J. F. (1974). Search and decision processes in recognition memory. In D. R. Krantz, R. C. Atkinson, R. D. Luce, & P. Suppes (Eds.),Contemporary developments in mathematical psychology: Learning, memory, and thinking (Vol. 1, pp. 243–293). San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bousfield, W. A., &Sedgewick, C. H. (1944). An analysis of restricted associative responses.Journal of General Psychology,30, 149–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bousfield, W. A., Sedgewick, C. H., &Cohen, B. W. (1954). Certain temporal characteristics of the recall of verbal associates.American Journal of Psychology,67, 111–118.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burbeck, S. L., &Luce, R. D. (1982). Evidence from auditory simple reaction times for both change and level detectors.Perception & Psychophysics,32, 117–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, M. R. W. (1988). Fitting the ex-Gaussian equation to reaction time distributions.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,20, 54–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorfein, D. S., &Jacobson, D. E. (1973). Memory search in a Brown-Peterson short-term memory paradigm.Journal of Experimental Psychology,99, 82–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gronlund, S. D., &Shiffrin, R. M. (1986). Retrieval strategies in re-call of natural categories and categorized lists.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,12, 550–561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heathcote, A., Popiel, S. J., &Mewhort, D. J. K. (1991). Analysis of response time distributions: An example using the Stroop task.Psychological Bulletin,109, 340–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrmann, D. J., &Pearle, P. M. (1981). The proper role of clusters in mathematical models of continuous recall.Journal of Mathematical Psychology,24, 139–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hockley, W. E. (1982). Retrieval processes in continuous recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,8, 497–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hockley, W. E. (1984). Analysis of response time distributions in the study of cognitive processes.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,10, 598–615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoel, P. G. (1971).Introduction to mathematical statistics (4th ed.). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hohle, R. H. (1965). Inferred components of reaction times as functions of foreperiod duration.Journal of Experimental Psychology,69, 382–386.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Indow, T., &Togano, K. (1970). On retrieving sequences from longterm memory.Psychological Review,77, 317–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luce, R. D. (1986).Response times: Their role in inferring elementary organization. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacLeod, C. M., &Nelson, T. O. (1984). Response latency and response accuracy as measures of memory.Acta Psychologica,57, 215–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maindonald, J. H. (1984).Statistical computation. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGill, W. J. (1963). Stochastic latency mechanisms. In R. D. Luce, R. R. Bush, & E. Galanter (Eds.),Handbook of mathematical psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 309–360). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metcalfe, J., &Murdock, B. B. (1981). An encoding and retrieval model of single-trial free recall.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,20, 161–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murdock, B. B., Jr. (1982). A theory for the storage and retrieval of item and associative information.Psychological Review,89, 609–626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murdock, B. B., Jr., &Okada, R. (1970). Interresponse times in single-trial free recall.Journal of Experimental Psychology,86, 263–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papoulis, A. (1965).Probability, random variables, and stochastic processes (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, K. E., Meltzer, R. H., &Mandler, G. (1971). Interresponse times in categorized free recall.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,10, 417–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollio, H. R., Kasschau, R. A., &DeNise, H. E. (1968). Associative structure and the temporal characteristics of free recall.Journal of Experimental Psychology,76, 190–197.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pollio, H. R., Richards, S., &Lucas, R. (1969). Temporal properties of category recall.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,8, 529–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raaijmakers, J. G., &Shiffrin, R. M. (1980). SAM: A theory of probabilistic search of associative memory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 14, pp. 207–262). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ratcliff, R. (1978). A theory of memory retrieval.Psychological Review,85, 59–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ratcliff, R. (1979). Group reaction distributions and an analysis of distribution statistics.Psychological Bulletin,86, 446–461.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ratcliff, R., &Murdock, B. B. (1976). Retrieval processes in recognition memory.Psychological Review,83, 190–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roediger, H. L., III,Stellon, C. C., &Tulving, E. (1977). Inhibition from part-list cues and rate of recall.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,3, 164–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roediger, H. L., III, &Thorpe, L. A. (1978). The role of recall time in producing hypermnesia.Memory & Cognition,6, 296–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roediger, H. L., III, &Tulving, E. (1979). Exclusion of learned material from recall as a postretrieval operation.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,18, 601–615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schulz, U., &Albert, D. (1976). Das Reproduzieren und seine Beenigung: Eine Klasse von Zählermodellen [Free recall and its interpretation: A class of counting models].Zeitschrift für experimentelle und angewandte Psychologie,23, 678–699.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiffrin, R. M. (1970). Memory search. In D. A. Norman (Ed.),Models of human memory (pp. 375–447). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sloman, S. A., Bower, G. H., &Rohrer, D. (1991). Congruency effects in part-list cuing inhibition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,17, 974–982.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Townsend, J. T. (1971). A note on the identifiability of parallel and serial processes.Perception & Psychophysics,10, 161–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vorberg, D., &Ulrich, R. (1987). Random search with unequal search rates: Serial and parallel generalizations of McGill’s model.Journal of Mathematical Psychology,31, 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wixted, J. T., &Rohrer, D. (1993). Proactive interference and the dynamics of retrieval.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,19, 1024–1039.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wixted, J. T., &Rohrer, D. (1994). Analyzing the dynamics of free recall: An integrative review of the empirical literature.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,1, 89–106.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology 0109, University of California at San Diego, 92093, La Jolla, CA

    Doug Rohrer & John T. Wixted

Authors
  1. Doug Rohrer
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. John T. Wixted
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

This research was supported in part by NIMH Training Grant MH-14268 to the first author.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rohrer, D., Wixted, J.T. An analysis of latency and interresponse time in free recall. Memory & Cognition 22, 511–524 (1994). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03198390

Download citation

  • Received: 27 April 1993

  • Accepted: 21 October 1993

  • Issue date: September 1994

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03198390

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Free Recall
  • Latency Distribution
  • Study List
  • Proactive Interference
  • List Length
Use our pre-submission checklist

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

Advertisement

Search

Navigation

  • Find a journal
  • Publish with us
  • Track your research

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Books A-Z

Publish with us

  • Journal finder
  • Publish your research
  • Language editing
  • Open access publishing

Products and services

  • Our products
  • Librarians
  • Societies
  • Partners and advertisers

Our brands

  • Springer
  • Nature Portfolio
  • BMC
  • Palgrave Macmillan
  • Apress
  • Discover
  • Your US state privacy rights
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms and conditions
  • Privacy policy
  • Help and support
  • Legal notice
  • Cancel contracts here

132.145.61.108

Not affiliated

Springer Nature

© 2025 Springer Nature