Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to link.springer.com

Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in
Menu
Find a journal Publish with us Track your research
Search
Cart
  1. Home
  2. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers
  3. Article

Words high and low in pleasantness as rated by male and female college students

  • Methods & Designs
  • Published: May 1986
  • Volume 18, pages 299–303, (1986)
  • Cite this article
Download PDF
Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers Aims and scope Submit manuscript
Words high and low in pleasantness as rated by male and female college students
Download PDF
  • Francis S. Bellezza1,
  • Anthony G. Greenwald2 &
  • Mahzarin R. Banaji2 
  • 3146 Accesses

  • 130 Citations

  • 3 Altmetric

  • Explore all metrics

Abstract

No catalog of words currently available contains normative data for large numbers of words rated low or high in affect. A preliminary sample of 1,545 words was rated for pleasantness by 26–33 college students. Of these words, 274 were selected on the basis of their high or low ratings. These words, along with 125 others (Rubin, 1981), were then rated by additional groups of 62–76 college students on 5-point rating scales for the dimensions of pleasantness, imagery, and familiarity. The resulting mean ratings were highly correlated with the ratings obtained by other investigators using some of the same words. However, systematic differences in the ratings were found for male versus female raters. Females tended to use more extreme ratings than did males when rating words on the pleasantness scale. Also, females tended to rate words higher on the imagery and familiarity scales. Whether these sex differences in ratings represent cognitive differences between the sexes or merely differences in response style is a question that can be determined only by further research.

Article PDF

Download to read the full article text

Similar content being viewed by others

Differences in emotional expression among college students: a study on integrating psychometric methods and algorithm optimization

Article Open access 20 March 2025

The Glasgow Norms: Ratings of 5,500 words on nine scales

Article Open access 11 September 2018

Minho Affective Sentences (MAS): Probing the roles of sex, mood, and empathy in affective ratings of verbal stimuli

Article 22 March 2016

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, books and news in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.
  • Attitudes
  • Language and Gender
  • Positive Psychology
  • Psychometrics
  • Sexual Dimorphism
  • Social Perception
Use our pre-submission checklist

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

References

  • Anderson, N. H. (1968). Likeableness ratings of 555 personality-trait words.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,9, 272–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anisfeld, M., &Lambert, W. E. (1966). When are pleasant words learned faster than unpleasant words?Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,5, 132–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banaji, M. R.,Bellezza, F S., &Greenwald, A. G. (1985, May).Are women more emotional? Gender differences in reported emotional response do not translate to recall. Paper presented at the meeting of the Midwestern Psychological Association, Chicago, IL.

  • Bousfield, W. A. (1950). The relationship between mood and the production of affectively toned associations.Journal of General Psychology,42, 67–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broadbent, D. E., &Gregory, M H. P. (1967). The perception of emotionally toned words.Nature,215, 581–584.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A. S. (1976). Catalog of scaled verbal material.Memory & Cognition,4(1B), 1S-45S.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, W. P., &Ure, D. M. J. (1969). Five rated characteristics of 650 word association stimuli.British Journal of Psychology,60, 233–249.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cason, H., &Lungren, F C. (1932). Memory for pleasant, unpleasant, and indifferent words.Journal of Experimental Psychology,15, 728–732.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isen, A. (1984). Toward understanding the role of affect in cognition. In R. Wyer & T. Srull (Eds.),Handbook of social cognition (Vol. 3, pp. 179–236). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanungo, R. N., &Dutta, S. (1966). Retention of affective material: Frame of reference or intensity?Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,4, 27–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ledgerwood, R. (1932). A comparison of methods in determining the affective value of words.American Journal of Psychology,44, 796–797.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levinger, G., &Clark, J. (1961). Emotional factors in the forgetting of word associations.Journal of Abnormal & Social Psychology,62, 99–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paivio, A. (1971).Imagery and verbal processes. New York: Holt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paivio, A.,Yuille, J. C, &Madigan, S A. (1968). Concreteness, imagery, and meaningfulness values for 925 nouns.Journal of Experimental Psychology Monograph Supplement, 76(1, Pt. 2).

  • Rubin, D. C. (1980). 51 properties of 125 words: A unit analysis of behavior.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,19, 736–755.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, D. C. (1981). Norms for 34 properties of 125 words.JASA Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology,11, 19. (Ms. No. 2213)

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverstein, A., &Dienstbier, R. A. (1968). Rated pleasantness and association value of 101 English nouns.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,7, 81–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teasdale, J. D., &Russell, M. L. (1983). Differential aspects of induced mood on the recall of positive, negative, and neutral words.British Journal of Clinical Psychology,22, 163–171.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thorndike, E. L., &Lorge, I. (1944).The teacher’s word book of 30,000 words. New York: Teachers College Press, Columbia University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toglia, M. P., &Battig, W. F. (1978).Handbook of semantic word norms. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, M. M. (1936). Some factors influencing the recall of pleasant and unpleasant words.American Journal of Psychology,48, 134–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, Ohio Univeristy, 45701, Athens, OH

    Francis S. Bellezza

  2. Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio

    Anthony G. Greenwald & Mahzarin R. Banaji

Authors
  1. Francis S. Bellezza
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Anthony G. Greenwald
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mahzarin R. Banaji
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

This research was supported in part by a grant to the first author from the Field-Wiltsie foundation. The authors would like to thank Ronald Sokol for his help in collecting and scoring the data. Thanks also go to Ohio University Computing and Learning Services for making computer time and their facilities available.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bellezza, F.S., Greenwald, A.G. & Banaji, M.R. Words high and low in pleasantness as rated by male and female college students. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 18, 299–303 (1986). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03204403

Download citation

  • Received: 18 September 1985

  • Accepted: 18 March 1986

  • Issue date: May 1986

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03204403

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Visual Imagery
  • Response Style
  • Female College Student
  • Front Page
  • Response Sheet
Use our pre-submission checklist

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

Advertisement

Search

Navigation

  • Find a journal
  • Publish with us
  • Track your research

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Books A-Z

Publish with us

  • Journal finder
  • Publish your research
  • Language editing
  • Open access publishing

Products and services

  • Our products
  • Librarians
  • Societies
  • Partners and advertisers

Our brands

  • Springer
  • Nature Portfolio
  • BMC
  • Palgrave Macmillan
  • Apress
  • Discover
  • Your US state privacy rights
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms and conditions
  • Privacy policy
  • Help and support
  • Legal notice
  • Cancel contracts here

132.145.61.108

Not affiliated

Springer Nature

© 2025 Springer Nature