Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to link.springer.com

Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in
Menu
Find a journal Publish with us Track your research
Search
Cart
  1. Home
  2. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers
  3. Article

Comparing the results of laboratory and World-Wide Web samples on the determinants of female attractiveness

  • Internet Experiments
  • Published: June 1997
  • Volume 29, pages 264–269, (1997)
  • Cite this article
Download PDF
Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers Aims and scope Submit manuscript
Comparing the results of laboratory and World-Wide Web samples on the determinants of female attractiveness
Download PDF
  • John H. Krantz1,
  • Jody Ballard1 &
  • Jody Scher1 
  • 1165 Accesses

  • 146 Citations

  • Explore all metrics

Abstract

The Internet provides a new method to obtain subjects. Arguments supporting the use of the Internet as an experimental medium include the ease of data collection, limited resources needed, and ability to gain a sample more representative of the population. However, it has not been demonstrated that the Internet provides the conditions necessary to yield valid data. This paper compares results from experiments conducted over the Internet and in a laboratory. Correlating the means from the Internet samples to the laboratory samples on important interactions yielded values near 1.0, indicating that the two data sets are driven by the same psychological variables. Further evidence of the validity of these Web studies comes from regression analyses. However, more studies of this sort are needed to further identify what types of experiments may be validly conducted over the Internet.

Article PDF

Download to read the full article text

Similar content being viewed by others

Methodological Issues Relating to Internet-Based Surveys

Chapter © 2017

Web Application for Simple System Identification from Experimental Data

Chapter © 2016

lab.js: A free, open, online study builder

Article Open access 28 July 2021

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, books and news in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.
  • Experimental Psychology
  • Internetpsychology
  • Internet Studies
  • Psychometrics
  • Quantitative Psychology
  • Net Literature
Use our pre-submission checklist

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

References

  • Engen, T. (1971). Psychophysics II: Scaling methods. In J. W. Kling & L. A. Riggs (Eds.),Woodworth and Schlossberg’s Experimental psychology (3rd ed., pp. 47–86). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fallon, A.,&Rozin, P. (1985). Sex differences in perceptions of desirable body shape.Journal of Abnormal Psychology,94, 102–105.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mable, H., Balance, W.,&Galgan, R. (1986). Body image distortion and satisfaction in university students.Perceptual & Motor Skills,63, 907–911.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reips, U. (1996, October).Experimenting in the World-Wide Web. Paper presented at the 1996 Society for Computers in Psychology Conference, Chicago.

  • Schmidt, W. C.,MacDonald, J., &Hoffmann, R. (1996, October).Setting up your own World-Wide Web server. Paper presented at the 1996 Society for Computers in Psychology Conference, Chicago.

  • Shaughnessy, J. J., &Zechmeister, E. B. (1994).Research methods in psychology (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverstein, L. D., Krantz, J. H., Gomer, F. E., Yeh, Y.,&Monty, R. W. (1990). The effects of spatial sampling and luminance quantization on the image quality of color matrix displays.Journal of the Optical Society of America A,7, 1955–1968.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silverstein, B., Perdue, L., Peterson, B.,&Kelly, E. (1986). Some correlates of the thin standard of bodily attractiveness for women.International Journal of Eating Disorders,5, 145–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, D. (1993). Adaptive significance of female physical attractiveness: Role of waist-to-hip ratio.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,65, 293–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welch, N.,&Krantz, J. H. (1996). The World-Wide Web as a medium for psychoacoustical demonstrations and experiments: Experience and results.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,28, 192–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiggins, J., Wiggins, N.,&Conger, J. (1968). Correlates of heterosexual preference.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,10, 82–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Hanover College, P.O. Box 108, 47243-0108, Hanover, IN

    John H. Krantz, Jody Ballard & Jody Scher

Authors
  1. John H. Krantz
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jody Ballard
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jody Scher
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

The authors would like to express their deep gratitude to the two anonymous reviewers and the editor for their many helpful comments, which greatly improved the quality of this paper. We would also like to thank the many subjects both from the laboratory and World-Wide Web studies for sharing their perceptions.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Krantz, J.H., Ballard, J. & Scher, J. Comparing the results of laboratory and World-Wide Web samples on the determinants of female attractiveness. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 29, 264–269 (1997). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03204824

Download citation

  • Received: 18 November 1996

  • Accepted: 05 February 1997

  • Issue date: June 1997

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03204824

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Breast Size
  • Female Attractiveness
  • Journal Ofthe Optical Society ofAmerica
  • Lower Order Effect
  • Hanover College
Use our pre-submission checklist

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

Advertisement

Search

Navigation

  • Find a journal
  • Publish with us
  • Track your research

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Books A-Z

Publish with us

  • Journal finder
  • Publish your research
  • Language editing
  • Open access publishing

Products and services

  • Our products
  • Librarians
  • Societies
  • Partners and advertisers

Our brands

  • Springer
  • Nature Portfolio
  • BMC
  • Palgrave Macmillan
  • Apress
  • Discover
  • Your US state privacy rights
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms and conditions
  • Privacy policy
  • Help and support
  • Legal notice
  • Cancel contracts here

132.145.61.108

Not affiliated

Springer Nature

© 2025 Springer Nature