Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to link.springer.com

Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in
Menu
Find a journal Publish with us Track your research
Search
Cart
  1. Home
  2. Memory & Cognition
  3. Article

Comparing naming, lexical decision, and eye fixation times: Word frequency effects and individual differences

  • Published: November 1998
  • Volume 26, pages 1270–1281, (1998)
  • Cite this article
Download PDF
Memory & Cognition Aims and scope Submit manuscript
Comparing naming, lexical decision, and eye fixation times: Word frequency effects and individual differences
Download PDF
  • Hildur E. H. Schilling1,
  • Keith Rayner1 &
  • James I. Chumbley1 
  • 5868 Accesses

  • 297 Citations

  • 1 Altmetric

  • Explore all metrics

Abstract

Performance on three different tasks was compared: naming, lexical decision, and reading (with eye fixation times on a target word measured). We examined the word frequency effect for a common set of words for each task and each subject. Naming and reading (particularly gaze duration) yielded similar frequency effects for the target words. The frequency effect found in lexical decision was greater than that found in naming and in eye fixation times. In all tasks, there was a correlation between the frequency effect and average response time. In general, the results suggest that both the naming and the lexical decision tasks yield data about word recognition processes that are consistent with effects found in eye fixations during silent reading.

Article PDF

Download to read the full article text

Similar content being viewed by others

How well do word recognition measures correlate? Effects of language context and repeated presentations

Article 12 November 2018

Differences in Reading Between Word Search and Information Relevance Decisions: Evidence from Eye-Tracking

Chapter © 2017

How low can you go? Tracking eye movements during reading at different sampling rates

Article Open access 09 June 2025

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, books and news in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.
  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Cognition
  • Cognitive Science
  • Language Processing
  • Psychophysics
  • Working Memory
Use our pre-submission checklist

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

References

  • Altarriba, J., Kroll, J. F., Sholl, A., &Rayner, K. (1996). The influence of lexical and conceptual constraints on reading mixedlanguage sentences: Evidence from eye fixations and naming times.Memory & Cognition,24, 477–492.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balota, D. A., &Chumbley, J. I. (1984). Are lexical decisions a good measure of lexical access? The role of word frequency in the neglected decision stage.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,10, 340–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balota, D. A., &Chumbley, J. I. (1985). The locus of word-frequency effects in the pronunciation task: Lexical access and/or production?Journal of Memory & Language,24, 89–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Besner, D., &McCann, R. S. (1987). Word frequency and pattern distortion in visual word identification and production: An examination of four classes of models. In M. Coltheart (Ed.),Attention and performance XII: The psychology of reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chumbley, J. I., &Balota, D. A. (1984). A word’s meaning affects the decision in lexical decision.Memory & Cognition,12, 590–606.

    Google Scholar 

  • Everatt, J., &Underwood, G. (1994). Individual differences in reading subprocesses: Relationships between reading ability, lexical access, and eye movement control.Language & Speech,37, 283–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forster, K. I., &Chambers, S. M. (1973). Lexical access and naming time.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,12, 627–635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Francis, W., &Kučera, H. (1987).Frequency analysis of English usage. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frederiksen, J. R., &Kroll, J. F. (1976). Spelling and sound: Approaches to the internal lexicon.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,2, 361–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gernsbacher, M. A. (1984). Resolving 20 years of inconsistent interactions between lexical familiarity and orthography, concreteness, and polysemy.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,113, 256–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, P. T. W., &Bergman, M. W. (1985). Lexical knowledge in word recognition: Word length and word frequency in naming and lexical decision tasks.Journal of Memory & Language,24, 46–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inhoff, A. W. (1984). Two stages of word processing during eye fixations in the reading of prose.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,23, 612–624.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inhoff, A. W., &Rayner, K. (1986). Parafoveal word processing during eye fixations in reading: Effects of word frequency.Perception & Psychophysics,40, 431–439.

    Google Scholar 

  • Just, M. A., &Carpenter, P. A. (1980). A theory of reading: From eye fixations to comprehension.Psychological Review,87, 329–354.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lewellen, M. J., Goldinger, S. D., Pisoni, D. B., &Greene, B. (1993). Lexical familiarity and processing efficiency: Individual differences in naming, lexical decision, and semantic categorization.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,122, 316–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lupker, S. J., Brown, P., &Colombo, L. (1997). Strategic control in a naming task: Changing routes or changing deadlines?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,23, 570–590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monsell, S., Doyle, M. C., &Haggard, P. N. (1989). Effects of frequency on visual word recognition tasks: Where are they?Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,118, 43–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, C. M., &Ellis, A. W. (1995). Roles of word frequency and age of acquisition in word naming and lexical decision.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,21, 116–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, R. E (1984). Manipulation of stimulus onset delay in reading: Evidence for parallel programming of saccades.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,10, 667–682.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paap, K. R., McDonald, J. E., Schvaneveldt, R. W., &Noel, R. W. (1987). Frequency and pronounceability in visually presented naming and lexical decision tasks. In M. Coltheart (Ed.),Attention and performance XII: The psychology of reading (pp. 221–243). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollatsek, A., Lesch, M., Morris, R. K., &Rayner, K. (1992). Phonological codes are used in integrating information across saccades in reading.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,18, 148–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pugh, K. R., Shaywitz, B. A., Shaywitz, S. E., Shankweiler, D. P., Katz, L., Fletcher, J. M., Skudlarski, P., Fulbright, R. K., Constable, R. T., Bronen, R. A., Lacadie, C., &Gore, J. C. (1997). Predicting reading performance from neuroimaging profiles: The cerebral basis of phonological effects in printed word identification.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,23, 299–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rayner, K. (1977). Visual attention in reading: Eye movements reflect cognitive processes.Memory & Cognition,5, 443–448.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rayner, K. (1995). Eye movements and cognitive processes in reading, visual search, and scene perception. In J. M. Findlay, R. W. Kentridge, & R. Walker (Eds.),Eye movement research: Mechanisms, processes, and applications (pp. 3–22). Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rayner, K., &Duffy, S. (1986). Lexical complexity and fixation times in reading: Effects of word frequency, verb complexity, and lexical ambiguity.Memory & Cognition,14, 191–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rayner, K., &Fischer, M. H. (1996). Mindless reading revisited: Eye movements during reading and scanning are different.Perception & Psychophysics,58, 734–747.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rayner, K., &Pollatsek, A. (1987). Eye movements in reading: A tutorial review. In M. Coltheart (Ed.),Attention and performance XII: The psychology of reading (pp. 327–362). London: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rayner, K., &Raney, G. E. (1996). Eye movement control in reading and visual search: Effects of word frequency.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,3, 245–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rayner, K., &Sereno, S. C. (1994). Eye movements in reading: Psycholinguistic studies. In M. Gernsbacher (Ed.),Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 57–81). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rayner, K., Sereno, S. C., Morris, R. K., Schmauder, A. R., &Clifton, C. (1989). Eye movements and on-line comprehension processes.Language & Cognitive Processes,4, 21–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rayner, K., Sereno, S. C., &Raney, G. E. (1996). Eye movement control in reading: A comparison of two types of models.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,22, 1188–1200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, J. T. E. (1976). The effects of stimulus attributes upon latency of word recognition.British Journal of Psychology,67, 315–325.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schustack, M. W., Ehrlich, S. F., &Rayner, K. (1987). The complexity of contextual facilitation in reading.Local and global inferences. Journal of Memory & Language,26, 322–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seidenberg, M. S. (1985a). Constraining models of word recognition.Cognition,20, 169–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seidenberg, M. S. (1985b). The time-course of phonological code activation in two writing systems.Cognition,19, 1–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Seidenberg, M. S., Waters, G. S., Barnes, M. A., &Tanenhaus, M. K. (1984). When does irregular spelling or pronunciation influence word recognition?Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,23, 383–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waters, G. S., &Seidenberg, M. S. (1985). Spelling-sound effects in reading: Time-course and decision criteria.Memory & Cognition,13, 557–572.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waters, G. S., Seidenberg, M. S., &Bruck, M. (1984). Children’s and adults’ use of spelling-sound information in three reading tasks.Memory & Cognition,12, 293–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whaley, C. P. (1978). Word-nonword classification time.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,17, 143–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, University of Massachusetts, 01003, Amherst, MA

    Hildur E. H. Schilling, Keith Rayner & James I. Chumbley

Authors
  1. Hildur E. H. Schilling
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Keith Rayner
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. James I. Chumbley
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Keith Rayner.

Additional information

This research was supported by NSF Grant DBS-9121375 and NIH Grant HD26765. K.R. was also supported by a research scientist award from the NIMH (MH01255). Portions of the data were presented at the joint meeting of the Experimental Psychology Society and the Canadian Society for Brain, Behaviour, and Cognitive Science, Toronto, July 1993.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schilling, H.E.H., Rayner, K. & Chumbley, J.I. Comparing naming, lexical decision, and eye fixation times: Word frequency effects and individual differences. Mem Cogn 26, 1270–1281 (1998). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03201199

Download citation

  • Received: 02 August 1995

  • Accepted: 04 May 1997

  • Issue date: November 1998

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03201199

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Target Word
  • Word Frequency
  • Frequency Effect
  • Lexical Decision Task
  • Word Frequency Effect
Use our pre-submission checklist

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

Advertisement

Search

Navigation

  • Find a journal
  • Publish with us
  • Track your research

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Books A-Z

Publish with us

  • Journal finder
  • Publish your research
  • Language editing
  • Open access publishing

Products and services

  • Our products
  • Librarians
  • Societies
  • Partners and advertisers

Our brands

  • Springer
  • Nature Portfolio
  • BMC
  • Palgrave Macmillan
  • Apress
  • Discover
  • Your US state privacy rights
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms and conditions
  • Privacy policy
  • Help and support
  • Legal notice
  • Cancel contracts here

132.145.61.108

Not affiliated

Springer Nature

© 2025 Springer Nature