Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to link.springer.com

Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in
Menu
Find a journal Publish with us Track your research
Search
Cart
  1. Home
  2. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers
  3. Article

Visual-word recognition thresholds for screen-fragmented names of the Snodgrass and Vanderwart pictures

  • Methods & Designs
  • Published: March 1992
  • Volume 24, pages 1–15, (1992)
  • Cite this article
Download PDF
Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers Aims and scope Submit manuscript
Visual-word recognition thresholds for screen-fragmented names of the Snodgrass and Vanderwart pictures
Download PDF
  • Joan Gay Snodgrass1 &
  • Meredith Poster1 
  • 898 Accesses

  • 18 Citations

  • Explore all metrics

Abstract

The set of names corresponding to the pictures from Snodgrass and Vanderwart (1980) were screen fragmented by means of a series of procedures implemented in Microsoft QuickBasic on a Macintosh microcomputer. Words were screen fragmented by deleting blocks of pixels from their images rather than by deleting individual letters. The screen-fragmentation procedure is particularly useful for the present set of words, in which a large proportion of the names of the pictures are short (fewer than five letters). The screen-fragmentation procedure can produce any number of fragmentation levels. In the present implementation, eight levels of fragmented images were produced, to correspond to the eight levels available for the Snodgrass and Vanderwart pictures.

Article PDF

Download to read the full article text

Similar content being viewed by others

The impact of image characteristics on written naming in adults

Article 08 February 2017

Deep Convolutional Neural Network for Correlating Images and Sentences

Chapter © 2018

Research on Recognition of Official Script in Natural Environment

Chapter © 2024

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, books and news in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.
  • Checkpoints
  • Lamination
  • Neddylation
  • Synaptic Pruning
  • Visual system
Use our pre-submission checklist

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

References

  • Andrews, S. (1989). Frequency and neighborhood effects on lexical access: Activation or search.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,15, 802–814.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Besner, D., &McCann, R. S. (1987). Word frequency and pattern distortion in visual word identification and production: An examination of four classes of models. In M. Coltheart (Ed.),Attention and Performance XII (pp. 201–219). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coltheart, M., Davelaar, E., Jonasson, J. T., &Besner, D. (1977). Access to the internal lexicon. In S. Dornic (Ed.),Attention and Performance VI (pp. 535–555). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eichelman, W. H. (1970). Familiarity effects in the simultaneous matching task.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,86, 275–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gollin, E. S. (1960). Developmental studies of visual recognition of incomplete objects.Perceptual & Motor Skills,11, 289–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graf, P., &Mandler, G. (1984). Activation makes words more accessible, but not necessarily more retrievable.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,23, 553–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graf, P., &Schacter, D. L. (1985). Implicit and explicit memory for new associations in normal and amnesic patients.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,11, 501–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grainger, J., O’Regan, J. K., Jacobs, A. M., &Segui, J. (1989). On the role of competing word units in visual word recognition: The neighborhood frequency effect.Perception & Psychophysics,45, 189–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirshman, E., Snodgrass, J. G., Mindes, J., &Feenan, K. (1990). Conceptual priming in picture fragment completion.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,16, 634–647.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howes, D. H., &Solomon, R. L. (1951). Visual duration threshold as a function of word probability.Journal of Experimental Psychology,41, 401–410.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jacoby, L. L., &Dallas, M. (1981). On the relationship between autobiographical memory and perceptual learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,110, 306–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, N. F. (1977). A pattern-unit model of word recognition. In D. Laberge & S. J. Samuels (Eds.),Basic processes in reading: Perception and comprehension (pp. 91–125). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kučera, H., &Francis, W. N. (1967).Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcel, A. J. (1983). Conscious and unconscious perception: Experiments on visual masking and word recognition.Cognitive Psychology,15, 197–237.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Masson, M. E. J., &Freedman, L. (1990). Fluent identification of repeated words.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,16, 355–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGinnies, E., Comer, P., &Lacy, O. L. (1952). Visual-recognition thresholds as a function of word length and word frequency.Journal of Experimental Psychology,44, 65–69.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Snodgrass, J. G., &Corwin, J. (1988). Perceptual identification thresholds for 150 fragmented pictures from the Snodgrass and Vanderwart picture set.Perceptual & Motor Skills,67 (Monograph Suppl. 1-V67), 3–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snodgrass, J. G., Smith, B., Feenan, K., &Corwin, J. (1987). Fragmenting pictures on the Apple Macintosh computer for experimental and clinical applications.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,19, 270–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snodgrass, J. G., &Vanderwart, M. (1980). A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for naming agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory,6, 174–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toth, J. P., &Hunt, R. R. (1990). Effect of generation on a word-identification task.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,16, 993–1003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tulving, E., Schacter, D. L., &Stark, H. A. (1982). Priming effects in word-fragment completion are independent of recognition memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,8, 336–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vokey, J. R., Baker, J. G., Hayman, G., &Jacoby, L. L. (1986). Perceptual identification of visually degraded stimuli.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,18, 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warrington, E. K., &Weiskrantz, L. (1968). New method of testing long-term retention with special reference to amnesic patients.Nature,217, 972–974.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weldon, M. S., &Roediger, H. L., III (1987). Altering retrieval demands reverses the picture superiority effect.Memory & Cognition,15, 269–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, New York University, 6 Washington Place, Room 857, 10003, New York, NY

    Joan Gay Snodgrass & Meredith Poster

Authors
  1. Joan Gay Snodgrass
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Meredith Poster
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joan Gay Snodgrass.

Additional information

This research was supported by Research Grant AFOSR 89-0442 from the Air Force Office of Scientific Research to the first author. A number of people encouraged us to undertake this study. We thank June Corwin, Pamela Dalton, Kelly Feenan, Chun Luo, and Janet Mindes for their encouragement and advice throughout.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Snodgrass, J.G., Poster, M. Visual-word recognition thresholds for screen-fragmented names of the Snodgrass and Vanderwart pictures. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 24, 1–15 (1992). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03203463

Download citation

  • Received: 15 April 1991

  • Accepted: 10 July 1991

  • Issue date: March 1992

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03203463

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Lexical Decision
  • Word Length
  • Implicit Memory
  • Neighborhood Size
  • Corwin
Use our pre-submission checklist

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

Advertisement

Search

Navigation

  • Find a journal
  • Publish with us
  • Track your research

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Books A-Z

Publish with us

  • Journal finder
  • Publish your research
  • Language editing
  • Open access publishing

Products and services

  • Our products
  • Librarians
  • Societies
  • Partners and advertisers

Our brands

  • Springer
  • Nature Portfolio
  • BMC
  • Palgrave Macmillan
  • Apress
  • Discover
  • Your US state privacy rights
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms and conditions
  • Privacy policy
  • Help and support
  • Legal notice
  • Cancel contracts here

132.145.61.108

Not affiliated

Springer Nature

© 2025 Springer Nature