Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to link.springer.com

Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in
Menu
Find a journal Publish with us Track your research
Search
Cart
  1. Home
  2. Memory & Cognition
  3. Article

A word’s meaning affects the decision in lexical decision

  • Published: November 1984
  • Volume 12, pages 590–606, (1984)
  • Cite this article
Download PDF
Memory & Cognition Aims and scope Submit manuscript
A word’s meaning affects the decision in lexical decision
Download PDF
  • James I. Chumbley1 &
  • David A. Balota1 
  • 2959 Accesses

  • 218 Citations

  • Explore all metrics

Abstract

The influence of an isolated word’s meaning on lexical decision reaction time (RT) was demonstrated through four experiments. Subjects in two experiments made lexical decision judgments, those in a third experiment pronounced the words used in the lexical decision task, and those in a fourth experiment quickly pronounced their first associative response to the words. Differences in lexical access time for the words were measured with the pronunciation task, and differences in meaning were assessed with the association task. Multiple regression analyses of lexical decision RT were conducted using associative RT, pronunciation RT, and other target word properties (printed frequency, length, instance dominance, and number of dictionary meanings) as predictor variables. These analyses revealed a relationship between lexical decision RT and associative RT after the effects of other variables had been partialed out. In addition, word frequency continued to have a significant relationship to lexical decision RT beyond that shared with pronunciation RT and the other variables. The results of these experiments indicate that at least some of the effect of word meaning and word frequency in lexical decision is attributable to a decision stage following lexical access.

Article PDF

Download to read the full article text

Similar content being viewed by others

Unseen but influential associates: Properties of words’ associates influence lexical and semantic processing

Article 08 March 2024

How well do word recognition measures correlate? Effects of language context and repeated presentations

Article 12 November 2018

The role of individual differences in emotional word recognition: Insights from a large-scale lexical decision study

Article Open access 04 September 2024

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, books and news in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.
  • Cognition
  • Decision Making
  • Language Processing
  • Lexicolopgy / Vocabulary
  • Linguistics
  • Speech Perception
Use our pre-submission checklist

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

References

  • Allport, D. A. (1977). On knowing the meaning of words we are unable to report: The effects of visual masking. In S. Dornic (Ed.),Attention and performance VI (pp. 505–533). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, S. (1982). Phonological recoding: Is the regularity effect consistent?Memory & Cognition,10, 565–575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, R. C., &Juola, J. F. (1974). Search and decision processes in recognition memory. In D. H. Krantz, R. C. Atkinson, R. D. Luce, & P. Suppes (Eds.),Contemporary developments in mathematical psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 243–293). San Francisco: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balota D. A. (1983). Automatic semantic activation and episodic memory encoding.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior,22, 88–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balota, D. A., &Chumbley, J. I. (1984). Are lexical decisions agood measure of lexical access? The role of word-frequency in the neglected decision stage.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,10, 340–357.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Balota, D. A., & Chumbley, J. I. (in press). The locus of word frequency effects in the pronunciation task: Lexical access and/or production frequency?Journal of Memory and Language.

  • Battig, W. F., & Montague, W. E. (1969). Category norms for verbal items in 56 categories: A replication and extension of the Connecticut category norms.Journal of Experimental Psychology Monographs,80 (3, Pt. 2).

  • Becker, C. A. (1980). Semantic context effects in visual word recognition: An analysis of semantic strategies.Memory & Cognition,8, 493–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coltheart, M. (1978). Lexical access in simple reading tasks. In G Underwood (Ed.),Strategies of information processing (pp. 151–216). London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darlington, R. B. (1968). Multiple regression in psychological research.Psychological Bulletin,69, 161–182.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Duchek, J. M., & Neely, J. H. ({dy1984})Levels-of-processing and frequency effects in episodic and semantic memory. Manuscript in preparation.

  • Forster, K. I. (1978). Accessing the mental lexicon. In E. Walker(Ed.),Explorations in the biology oflanguage (pp. 139–174). Montgomery, VT: Bradford Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forster, K. I. (1981). Frequency blocking and lexical access: One mental lexicon or two?Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior,20, 190–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forster, K. I., &Chambers, S. M. (1973). Lexical access and naming time.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior,12, 627–635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glanzer, M., &Ehrenreich, S. L. (1979). Structure and search of the internal lexicon.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior,18, 381–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glushko, R. J. (1981). Principles for pronouncing print: The psychology of phonography. In A. M. Lesgold & C. A. Perfetti (Eds.),Interactive processes in reading (pp. 61–84). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, B. (1983). Lexical access and lexical decision: Mechanisms of frequency sensitivity.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior,22, 24–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James, C. T. (1975). The role of semantic information in lexical decisions.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,1, 130–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jastrzembski, J. E. (1981). Multiple meanings, number of related meanings, frequency of occurrence, and the lexicon.Cognitive Psychology,13, 278–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kûcera, H., &Francis, W. (1967).A computational analyis of present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandler, G. (1980). Recognizing: The judgment of previous occurrence.Psychological Review,87, 252–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marcel, A. J. (1983). Conscious and unconscious perception: An approach to the relations between phenomenal experience and perceptual processes.Cognitive Psychology,15, 238–300.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marcel, A. J., &Patterson, K. E. (1978). Word recognition and production: Reciprocityin clinical and normal studies. In J. Requin (Ed.),Attention and performance VII (pp. 209–226). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mckoon, G., &Ratcliff, R. (1979). Priming in episodic and semantic memory.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior,18, 463–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morton, J. (1970). A functional model for memory. In D. A. Norman (Ed.),Models of human memory (pp. 203–254). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morton, J. (1979a). Facilitation in wordrecognition: Experiments causing change in the logogen model. In P. A. Kolers, M E. Wrolstad, & H. Bouma (Eds.).Processing of visible language (Vol. I, pp. 259–268). New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morton, J. (1979b). Word recognition. In J. Morton & J. C. Marshall (Eds.),Psycholinguistics 2: Structures and processes (pp. 106–156). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morton, J. (1982). Disintegrating the lexicon: An information processing approach. In J. Mehler, S. Franck, E. C. T. Walker, & M. Garrett (Eds.),Perspectives on mental representation (pp. 89–109). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollatsek, A., &Rayner, K. (1982). Eye movement control in reading: The de of word boundaries.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,8, 817–833.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scarborough, D. L., Cortese, C., &Scarborough, H. S. (1977). Frequency and repetition effects in lexical memory.Journal of Experimenal Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,3, 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scarborough, D. L., Gerard, L., &Cortese, C. (1979). Accessing lexical memory: The transfer of word repetition effects across task and modality.Memory & Cognition,7, 3–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schuberth, R. E., &Eimas, P. D. (1977). Effects of context on the classification of words and nonwords.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,3, 27–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seidenburg, M. S., Waters, G. S., Sanders, M., &Langer, P. (1984). Pre- and postlexical loci of contextual effects on word recognition.Memory & Cognition,12, 315–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, E. E., Shoben, E. J., &Rips, L. J. (1974). Structure and process in semantic memory: A featural model for semantic decisions.Psychological Review,81, 214–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West, R. F., &Stanovich, K. E. (1982). Source of inhibition in expenments on the effect of sentence context on word recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,8, 385–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whaley, C. P. (1978). Word-nonword classification time.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior,17, 143–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, University of Massachusetts, 01003, Amherst, MA

    James I. Chumbley & David A. Balota

Authors
  1. James I. Chumbley
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. David A. Balota
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

This research was partially supported by a NIMH Postdoctoral Fellowship 5-25007 to the second author and a research grant from the Centronics Computer Corporation to the first author. Both authors contributed equally to this research project.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chumbley, J.I., Balota, D.A. A word’s meaning affects the decision in lexical decision. Memory & Cognition 12, 590–606 (1984). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03213348

Download citation

  • Received: 04 November 1983

  • Accepted: 16 July 1984

  • Issue date: November 1984

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03213348

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Target Word
  • Word Recognition
  • Lexical Decision
  • Word Frequency
  • Lexical Decision Task
Use our pre-submission checklist

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

Advertisement

Search

Navigation

  • Find a journal
  • Publish with us
  • Track your research

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Books A-Z

Publish with us

  • Journal finder
  • Publish your research
  • Language editing
  • Open access publishing

Products and services

  • Our products
  • Librarians
  • Societies
  • Partners and advertisers

Our brands

  • Springer
  • Nature Portfolio
  • BMC
  • Palgrave Macmillan
  • Apress
  • Discover
  • Your US state privacy rights
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms and conditions
  • Privacy policy
  • Help and support
  • Legal notice
  • Cancel contracts here

132.145.61.108

Not affiliated

Springer Nature

© 2025 Springer Nature