Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

Update README to remove future work and details #419

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Oct 20, 2025
Merged

Update README to remove future work and details #419

merged 3 commits into from
Oct 20, 2025

Conversation

@MODSetter
Copy link
Owner

@MODSetter MODSetter commented Oct 20, 2025 •
edited by coderabbitai bot
Loading

Removed future work section and some details about Redis, Celery, and Flower.

High-level PR Summary

This PR cleans up the README by removing the future work section and reorganizing documentation details. Specifically, it removes references to external deployment guides, removes a bullet point about RAG as a Service API Backend from the features list, moves detailed descriptions of Redis, Celery, and Flower from external references to the dependencies section, and eliminates the entire "Future Work" section that listed planned features like adding more connectors and document podcasts.

⏱️ Estimated Review Time: 5-15 minutes

💡 Review Order Suggestion
Order File Path
1 README.md

Need help? Join our Discord

Analyze latest changes

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation

    • Updated Tech Stack to include Redis, Celery, and Flower for asynchronous tasks and monitoring.
    • Restructured installation and external references; removed outdated deployment guides and items from Future Work.

  • Chores

    • Added repository-level pre-commit tooling for code quality, formatting, security checks, secrets detection, and commit message linting.

@MODSetter
Update README to remove future work and details
30cfb4d 
Removed future work section and some details about Redis, Celery, and Flower.
@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Oct 20, 2025 •
edited
Loading

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
surf-sense-frontend Error Error Oct 20, 2025 9:00am

💡 Enable Vercel Agent with $100 free credit for automated AI reviews

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 20, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

Updated documentation and repository tooling: README additions for Redis, Celery, and Flower in the Tech Stack; removal of Docker/Deployment guide references and some Future Work items; and addition of a comprehensive .pre-commit-config.yaml with multiple hooks (linting, secrets, security, commit-msg, biome).

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Documentation Updates
README.md		 Added Redis, Celery, and Flower to Tech Stack; removed references to Docker Setup Guide and Deployment Guide from Installation; removed several items from Future Work; restructured installation notes and external sources.
Repository Tooling / Pre-commit
.pre-commit-config.yaml		 Added comprehensive pre-commit configuration: hooks for yaml/json/toml checks, merge-conflict/diff sanity, large files, debug statements, detect-secrets (with baseline & excludes), ruff-pre-commit (lint/format for surfsense_backend), Bandit security scans, Biome checks for surfsense_web, and commitizen commit-msg linting; scoped excludes and stages set.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~20 minutes

Possibly related PRs

Poem

🐰 I hopped through docs with nimble paws,

Redis queues and Celery laws.
Flower watches while tasks run free,
Pre-commit guards keep code tidy.
A carrot for CI — hop, follow me!

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title Check ✅ Passed The title "Update README to remove future work and details" is partially related to the changeset. It accurately reflects real changes—the PR does remove items from the Future Work section and removes deployment guide references. However, the title is incomplete as it omits a significant addition to the changeset: three new third-party stack components (Redis, Celery, Flower) were added to the Tech Stack section. The term "details" is also somewhat vague and could be more specific about what is being removed. While the title captures an important aspect of the change, it doesn't represent the full scope of the update.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changes. Docstring coverage check skipped.
📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 30cfb4d and a725139.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .pre-commit-config.yaml (1 hunks)

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

recurseml[bot]
recurseml bot reviewed Oct 20, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link

@recurseml recurseml bot left a comment •
edited
Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review by RecurseML

🔍 Review performed on 45de58e..30cfb4d

✨ No bugs found, your code is sparkling clean

✅ Files analyzed, no issues (1)

• README.md

@MODSetter MODSetter merged commit 4dc5ceb into main Oct 20, 2025
4 of 7 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

1 more reviewer

@recurseml recurseml[bot] recurseml[bot] left review comments

Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@MODSetter