Allow SRCS on SC #6009
Merged
Allow SRCS on SC #6009
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #6009 +/- ##
============================================
- Coverage 29.07% 29.07% -0.01%
+ Complexity 13960 13958 -2
============================================
Files 2576 2576
Lines 267395 267398 +3
Branches 47803 47803
============================================
Hits 77744 77744
- Misses 185750 185755 +5
+ Partials 3901 3899 -2 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
Member
Yeah, SC would be allows. WS are limited to SDS (CASPAR) DRONE CONTROL SYSTEM (SDS-DCS) SV's would be allowed as well. |
neoancient
approved these changes
Sep 17, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Allows mounting of Smart Robotic Control Systems on SmallCraft.
MegaMek/megameklab#1559
@HammerGS IO p215 and p134 are contradictory but at least it seems clear that SC should be allowed to mount it and improve it. WS are unclear and the improved version is even more unclear (SV allowed?).