So this makes the python integration work?

Hope so :)
All futures are tested, and I use it for month without errors

2016-10-28 10:49 GMT+02:00 Łukasz Łaniewski-Wołłk [email protected]
:

So this makes the python integration work?

—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#108 (comment), or mute
the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADYOx8u_FRw6k-MspcfhJhWnAdf6Xb6Yks5q4bcJgaJpZM4Kijan
.

Oi, mate! You broke d2q9.

I cannot allow it! Even example/karman.xml doesn't work! It's over complicated - d2q9 should be the simple one!

It probably doesn't work because of the name changes. Will check. (And
karman is not the unit test :p)
Maybe d2q9_simple? We need place to test/add new futures like python, bc
etc/

2016-10-28 16:15 GMT+02:00 Łukasz Łaniewski-Wołłk [email protected]
:

Oi, mate! You broke d2q9.

I cannot allow it! Even example/karman.xml doesn't work! It's over
complicated - d2q9 should be the simple one!

—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#108 (comment), or mute
the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADYOx7lUw_L-syNM8Yi2HfBUaf0NVD03ks5q4gN0gaJpZM4Kijan
.

@mdzik lot of things happening here. Ready to go?

So:

• it should provide stable python integration
• I will provide simplified d2q9 soon

I think this should be merged, it's as stable as I could be without wider beta testing ;) And i will wait for feature requests/bugfixes

Sorry for delay - project meeting :/

Can you merge (or rebase), with:
llaniewski@c47eade

So we will have a common trunk.

Then there will be less fuzz downstream.

Ok, I did the merge myself. Otherwise we would have a mess.

I will merge this if you do not have nothing more to do here. I will address the d2q9 simpleness later :D

Changed base to V6.1 RC. Merging.