Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
6 changes: 3 additions & 3 deletions README.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -68,9 +68,6 @@ Version
- 4.0 May 2025 addition of phrase atoms by Saulo de Oliveira Cantanhêde

### Features

Here and there we still need to decide which value a feature should have for a specific object. In this case, the value is "absent".

Currently, the following features exist for all books:
- g_cons
- lex
Expand All @@ -89,3 +86,6 @@ Currently, the following features exist for all books:
- prs_nu
- gn
- prs_gn

### Textual issues
Some annotations are dubious due to idiosyncracies in the SP manuscript used for this project. The issues are documented in the folder textual_issues.
4 changes: 2 additions & 2 deletions app/__checkout__.txt
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
v3.4.1
g0575237fb9964017c6cf27872d7b84796a4f0b8f
v4.0
g53b0f36196e9dce99b8e255cd63df2f2812e07a2
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion app/config.yaml
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ docs:
interfaceDefaults: {}
provenanceSpec:
corpus: The Samaritan Pentateuch
version: '4.0.1'
version: '4.1'
writing: hbo
typeDisplay:
verse:
Expand Down
1 change: 1 addition & 0 deletions textual_issues/issues.json
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
{"0": {"data_version": "4.1", "tf_node": 412335, "section": ["Genesis", 15, 8], "explanation": "The second yod is interpreted as a dittography, but the first yod may also be a vowel indicator and the second part of the lexeme"}, "1": {"data_version": "4.1", "tf_node": 430624, "section": ["Genesis", 44, 10], "explanation": "The word is interpreted as the verb NQH in Qal passive participle realized with an aleph"}, "2": {"data_version": "4.1", "tf_node": 433530, "section": ["Genesis", 49, 12], "explanation": "Florentin and Tal suggests a plural perfective verb with four radicals(?) or a noun. It is interpreted here simply as a singular, masculine adjective"}, "3": {"data_version": "4.1", "tf_node": 446025, "section": ["Exodus", 19, 24], "explanation": "The word K is interpreted as the imperative of HLK and should have been LK"}, "4": {"data_version": "4.1", "tf_node": 470812, "section": ["Leviticus", 19, 18], "explanation": "FLorentin and Tal interpret the verb as an imperfect of VWR[, but it does not explain the presence of an H in this manuscript"}, "5": {"data_version": "4.1", "tf_node": 490667, "section": ["Numbers", 21, 18], "explanation": "The word is interpreted as a qal perfect of KRH[. To account for the aleph, it as treated as a univalent final"}, "6": {"data_version": "4.1", "tf_node": 492881, "section": ["Numbers", 24, 22], "explanation": "Following Florentin and Tal, the word is interpreted as a noun with pronominal suffix"}, "7": {"data_version": "4.1", "tf_node": 506367, "section": ["Deuteronomy", 9, 21], "explanation": "Florentin and Tal follow Ben-Hayyim in calling the H an exclamatory. On the other hand, they consider the verb an adverbial and a non-substantive variation to the Masoretic infinitiv absolute. It is treated here as an hiphil infinitive absolute"}, "8": {"data_version": "4.1", "tf_node": 508836, "section": ["Deuteronomy", 13, 15], "explanation": "Florentin and Tal follow Ben-Hayyim in calling the H an exclamatory. On the other hand, they consider the verb an adverbial and a non-substantive variation to the Masoretic infinitiv absolute. It is treated here as an hiphil infinitive absolute"}, "9": {"data_version": "4.1", "tf_node": 510499, "section": ["Deuteronomy", 17, 4], "explanation": "Florentin and Tal follow Ben-Hayyim in calling the H an exclamatory. On the other hand, they consider the verb an adverbial and a non-substantive variation to the Masoretic infinitiv absolute. It is treated here as an hiphil infinitive absolute"}, "10": {"data_version": "4.1", "tf_node": 515248, "section": ["Deuteronomy", 27, 8], "explanation": "Florentin and Tal follow Ben-Hayyim in calling the H an exclamatory. On the other hand, they consider the verb an adverbial and a non-substantive variation to the Masoretic infinitiv absolute. It is treated here as an hiphil infinitive absolute"}, "11": {"data_version": "4.1", "tf_node": 518074, "section": ["Deuteronomy", 31, 2], "explanation": "The verb is clearly meant to be BW>[ but the initial > is confusing. We suspect it is a scribal error"}, "12": {"data_version": "4.1", "tf_node": 519665, "section": ["Deuteronomy", 33, 2], "explanation": "According to Florentin and Tal, some manuscripts seperate the word into two with a dot. We do not know if this is the case for this manuscript, and we treat it currently as a single word"}}
2 changes: 2 additions & 0 deletions tf/4.0.1/__checkout__.txt
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
v4.0
g53b0f36196e9dce99b8e255cd63df2f2812e07a2
Loading