-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 222
Open
Description
Since discovering Stegcloak, I've wondered: can we hide secrets inside source code without drawing attention? This could mean embedding watermarks for plagiarism, tracking license misuse, for educational and enterteinment purposes like a treasure hunt, etc.
Use Cases
- Plagiarism/License Tracking: Embed markers in code to trace unauthorized reuse.
- Stealth Data Storage: Hide metadata in comments or inert code, unnoticed by casual reviewers.
Challenges
- Detection Risks: The method must be completely unobtrusive—any hint of tampering could be exploited.
- Complexity: Source code has its own quirks; embedding data seamlessly is far from trivial.
- Maintenance Overhead: Code evolves. A method that’s subtle today might look glaringly out of place tomorrow.
Integration vs. Separate Tool
- Integrating with Stegcloak:
- Pros: Taps into an existing user base.
- Cons: Risks muddling Stegcloak’s core focus and increasing maintenance burdens.
- Building a Separate Tool:
- Pros: Allows for dedicated development targeting source code nuances.
- Cons: Could split efforts and attention from the main project.
Conclusion
My gut tells me that a separate tool is smarter—keeping Stegcloak lean while exploring this niche innovation elsewhere. Thoughts?
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
No labels