Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

Conversation

@wuhuizuo
Copy link
Collaborator

Remove optional and skip_report to enable reporting and required status

Remove optional and skip_report to enable reporting and required status
@ti-chi-bot
Copy link

ti-chi-bot bot commented Sep 15, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign purelind for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.
Please ensure that each of them provides their approval before proceeding.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

Copy link

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I have already done a preliminary review for you, and I hope to help you do a better job.

Summary:

The pull request aims to update the job pull-check-deps in the common-presubmits.yaml file by removing the optional and skip_report attributes to enable reporting and make the status required. The approach taken is straightforward, focusing on removing unnecessary attributes. The overall code quality seems decent, with no critical issues identified.

Code Improvements:

  • common-presubmits.yaml - Line 13-14:
    Removing the optional and skip_report attributes is a good step to ensure that the job's status is required for reporting. However, it would be beneficial to add a comment explaining the reason for this change to improve code clarity and maintainability.

    @@ -11,8 +11,6 @@ presubmits:
          name: pull-check-deps
          decorate: true # need add this.
    -     optional: true # remove it when test passed
    -     skip_report: true # remove it when test passed
          skip_if_only_changed: *skip_if_only_changed
          skip_submodules: true
          spec:

Best Practices:

  • common-presubmits.yaml - Line 13-14:
    Consider adding a comment to explain the rationale behind removing the optional and skip_report attributes. This will help other developers understand the purpose of these changes easily.

    @@ -11,8 +11,6 @@ presubmits:
          name: pull-check-deps
          decorate: true # need add this.
    -     optional: true # remove it when test passed
    -     skip_report: true # remove it when test passed
          skip_if_only_changed: *skip_if_only_changed
          skip_submodules: true
          spec:

@ti-chi-bot ti-chi-bot bot added the size/XS label Sep 15, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @wuhuizuo, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request modifies the Prow job configuration for the pull-check-deps job within the pingcap/tidb repository. The primary goal is to elevate this job from an optional check to a mandatory one, ensuring that its status is always reported. This change aims to enforce stricter dependency validation for all incoming pull requests.

Highlights

  • Prow Job Configuration: The pull-check-deps Prow job for the tidb repository has been updated to remove its optional status.
  • Status Reporting: The pull-check-deps job will now report its status, making it a required check for pull requests.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request updates the pull-check-deps Prow job configuration in common-presubmits.yaml. By removing the optional: true and skip_report: true flags, the job is correctly promoted to a required status check, and its results will now be reported on pull requests. This change aligns with the intention documented in the comments that were also removed. The modification is straightforward and looks good.

@wuhuizuo
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/hold

wait for the decisions of TiDB teams

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

Status: No status

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants