Are we getting the fields in metaclasses wrong? #63
Description
The following program shows inconsistent output for different SOM implementations, and SOM++ may have unexpected fields:
Haoran = (
answersForHaoran: aClass = (
aClass name println.
' superclass: \'' print.
aClass superclass print. '\'' println.
' class is: \'' print.
aClass class print. '\'' println.
' SOM source-defined fields: ' print. aClass fields length println.
aClass fields do: [ :fieldName |
' ' print. fieldName println.
].
' methods: ' print. aClass methods length println.
aClass methods do: [ :methodName |
' ' print. methodName println.
].
' isClass: ' print. aClass isClass println.
' isMetaClass: ' print. aClass isMetaClass println.
'' println.
'' println.
)
run = (
self answersForHaoran: Object.
self answersForHaoran: Class.
self answersForHaoran: Metaclass.
self answersForHaoran: Metaclass class.
self answersForHaoran: Metaclass class class.
self answersForHaoran: Class class.
self answersForHaoran: Class class class.
self answersForHaoran: Object class.
self answersForHaoran: Object class class.
)
)core-lib.patch
pysom.txt
som-java.txt
sompp.txt
trufflesom.txt