fix(strict-boolean-expressions): fix memory leak #316
Merged
+16
−16
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
How to use the Graphite Merge QueueAdd the label 0-merge to this PR to add it to the merge queue. You must have a Graphite account in order to use the merge queue. Sign up using this link. An organization admin has enabled the Graphite Merge Queue in this repository. Please do not merge from GitHub as this will restart CI on PRs being processed by the merge queue. This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking. |
camchenry
approved these changes
Oct 24, 2025
17a6a1b to
b565c34
Compare
Merge activity
|
### TL;DR Fixed a bug in the `strict-boolean-expressions` rule by making the `traversedNodes` set local to each rule execution. ### What changed? Moved the `traversedNodes` set from a package-level variable to a local variable within the rule's `Run` function. Updated all traversal functions to accept this set as a parameter, ensuring that each rule execution has its own isolated set of traversed nodes. ### How to test? Run the linter on code with multiple files containing boolean expressions. Verify that the rule correctly identifies issues in each file independently without being affected by previously traversed nodes from other files. ### Why make this change? The previous implementation used a global `traversedNodes` set, which could cause issues when linting multiple files as nodes from one file could prevent proper traversal in subsequent files. This change ensures each rule execution has its own clean state, preventing cross-file interference and potential false negatives.
b565c34 to
74bd548
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
TL;DR
Fixed a bug in the
strict-boolean-expressionsrule by making thetraversedNodesset local to each rule execution.What changed?
Moved the
traversedNodesset from a package-level variable to a local variable within the rule'sRunfunction. Updated all traversal functions to accept this set as a parameter, ensuring that each rule execution has its own isolated set of traversed nodes.How to test?
Run the linter on code with multiple files containing boolean expressions. Verify that the rule correctly identifies issues in each file independently without being affected by previously traversed nodes from other files.
Why make this change?
The previous implementation used a global
traversedNodesset, which could cause issues when linting multiple files as nodes from one file could prevent proper traversal in subsequent files. This change ensures each rule execution has its own clean state, preventing cross-file interference and potential false negatives.