Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

Conversation

@kumaranvpl
Copy link
Collaborator

Why are these changes needed?

Related issue number

Closes #1022

Checks

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 18, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Flag Coverage Δ
3.10 59.73% <100.00%> (+6.44%) ⬆️
3.11 58.69% <100.00%> (+4.01%) ⬆️
3.12 56.18% <100.00%> (+2.93%) ⬆️
3.13 59.33% <100.00%> (+6.36%) ⬆️
3.9 66.60% <100.00%> (+13.54%) ⬆️
anthropic 36.99% <100.00%> (?)
autobuild 16.79% <100.00%> (?)
bedrock 15.96% <60.00%> (?)
browser-use 33.94% <100.00%> (+0.29%) ⬆️
cerebras 15.69% <60.00%> (?)
cohere 15.73% <60.00%> (?)
commsagent-discord 29.98% <60.00%> (?)
commsagent-slack 29.96% <60.00%> (?)
commsagent-telegram 29.91% <60.00%> (?)
crawl4ai 33.26% <100.00%> (+0.45%) ⬆️
deepseek 32.50% <100.00%> (?)
docs 28.71% <60.00%> (?)
gemini 39.34% <100.00%> (?)
graph-rag-falkor-db 28.19% <60.00%> (?)
groq 15.71% <60.00%> (?)
interop 33.49% <100.00%> (+0.51%) ⬆️
interop-crewai 28.94% <60.00%> (?)
interop-langchain 28.77% <60.00%> (?)
interop-pydantic-ai 29.29% <60.00%> (?)
jupyter-executor 30.76% <60.00%> (?)
lmm 18.86% <60.00%> (?)
long-context 14.89% <60.00%> (?)
macos-latest 60.19% <100.00%> (+6.86%) ⬆️
mistral 15.43% <60.00%> (?)
ollama 16.08% <60.00%> (?)
openai 44.01% <100.00%> (?)
retrievechat 29.69% <60.00%> (?)
retrievechat-couchbase 17.20% <60.00%> (?)
retrievechat-mongodb 29.68% <60.00%> (?)
retrievechat-pgvector 29.68% <60.00%> (?)
retrievechat-qdrant 29.63% <60.00%> (?)
teachable 17.88% <100.00%> (?)
together 15.75% <60.00%> (?)
twilio 28.41% <60.00%> (?)
ubuntu-latest 68.35% <100.00%> (+13.56%) ⬆️
websurfer 17.85% <60.00%> (?)
windows-latest 57.98% <100.00%> (+6.89%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
autogen/oai/client.py 76.03% <100.00%> (+20.89%) ⬆️

... and 38 files with indirect coverage changes

@davorrunje davorrunje added this pull request to the merge queue Feb 19, 2025
Merged via the queue into main with commit 493015a Feb 19, 2025
488 checks passed
@davorrunje davorrunje deleted the log-cache-msg-once branch February 19, 2025 13:09
AgentGenie pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 19, 2025
* Log cache value message only once using lru_cache

* Log cache value per client

* Modify param name

* Add test for log_cache_seed_value function

* Use mock credentials and monkeypatch cache.get

* Remove mark

* Move import to appropriate location
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Log using X as cache value message only once

3 participants