Add resolution consistency check #3112
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Member
Author
|
Hopefully, these checks will be green here |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There are two main ways to get dependency lists out of a
Resolutioninstance:orderedDependencies(main one), which should be used to compute an ordered list of artifacts, and walks the dependency graph to compute its resultminDependencies, used internally byResolutionitself, that contains a more compact list (removing some redundancies)This adds checks in the tests that the two are consistent with each other (no extra dependencies on one side or the other).
This is being helpful in #3097 to debug new developments in
Resolution.