Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

Bug/ Fix return values #31

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Bug/ Fix return values #31

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

@Zartaj0
Copy link

@Zartaj0 Zartaj0 commented Mar 25, 2025 •
edited by coderabbitai bot
Loading

StakingManager.sol had a compilation error, because of wrong return types.

The functions, delegate and cancelUnbondingDelegation return a bool instead of an int64.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Refactor
    • Modified staking operations to provide a boolean success indicator rather than a time-based value, offering clearer feedback on transaction outcomes.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 25, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Walkthrough

The pull request updates the StakingManager contract by changing the return types of two functions. Both the stakeTokens and cancelUnbondingDelegation methods have been modified to return a boolean value (bool success) instead of an int64 completionTime. The underlying logic remains unchanged, as the functions still delegate the actions to the STAKING_CONTRACT.

Changes

File Change Summary
examples/staking-manager/contracts/StakingManager.sol Updated function signatures for stakeTokens and cancelUnbondingDelegation: return type changed from int64 to bool.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User as User
    participant SM as StakingManager
    participant SC as STAKING_CONTRACT

    User->>SM: stakeTokens(_validatorAddr, _amount)
    SM->>SC: stakeTokens(...)
    SC-->>SM: bool success
    SM-->>User: bool success
Loading 
sequenceDiagram
    participant User as User
    participant SM as StakingManager
    participant SC as STAKING_CONTRACT

    User->>SM: cancelUnbondingDelegation(_validatorAddr, _amount, _creationHeight)
    SM->>SC: cancelUnbondingDelegation(...)
    SC-->>SM: bool success
    SM-->>User: bool success
Loading

Poem

I’m a coding bunny with a skip and a hop,
Tweaking return types—now they never stop.
From int64 to bool, the change is in sight,
My whiskers wiggle with pure delight.
Hopping through code, all is functionally right!
🐇💻✨

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e9df80d and 931ff1b.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • examples/staking-manager/contracts/StakingManager.sol (2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
examples/staking-manager/contracts/StakingManager.sol (2)

38-39: Return type correctly changed from int64 to bool to match STAKING_CONTRACT.delegate's return type

The return type change from int64 completionTime to bool success fixes the compilation error mentioned in the PR objectives. This aligns with the actual return type of the delegate function in StakingI.sol.

Note that this creates an inconsistency between this function (returning bool) and other similar functions like redelegateTokens and unstakeTokens (returning int64). Verify if this inconsistency is expected or if the other functions might need similar adjustments in the future.

67-68: Return type correctly changed from int64 to bool to match cancelUnbondingDelegation's return type

The return type change from int64 completionTime to bool success fixes the compilation error mentioned in the PR objectives. This aligns with the actual return type of the cancelUnbondingDelegation function in StakingI.sol.

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai plan to trigger planning for file edits and PR creation.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@Zartaj0