-
|
Hi! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 1 comment 11 replies
-
|
Not sure if that can be done through Firewall -> IP Forwarding/Masquerading IPv4 (I think it's slightly different what you request...). Hope @mattdibi @marcellorinaldo can assist us 😅 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Mmmmm reviewing the logs, a found an ERROR: System is Ubuntu 22.04.5, and uses ¿Kura 5.6.0 supports it or just |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Before moving on @pintify @alexcorvis84 should I treat your use-case as the same? Are you guys working together or did you stumble upon a similar use-case at the same time? Meanwhile I'll discuss this with the rest of the team. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Hi @mattdibi, yes, please consider the use-case as the same, as we're working together on the same issue. For now, we have left the interfaces as “Unmanaged” in Kura and have configured the static routes and IPs through NetworkManager. But this is just a 'temporary workaround' as we would like to take Kura control of the interfaces and being able to setup the static routes if possible. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Hello there @pintify @alexcorvis84, after reviewing your use-case with my teammates we agree that the IP Forwarding feature doesn't work for your use case. The correct way to address this is to leverage static routes which, currently, Kura doesn't support. To address this we would need to leverage the which we populate here (look here for 5.6.X version) The backend change is fairly trivial (update the code above so that it grabs the parameters from the snapshot and populates the outgoing data structure as per NetworkManager expectations... this is how we currently support VLANs). Updating the WebUI to support the routes would require some more work and API changes. Supporting static routes is currently not in our roadmap but we're happy to accept contributions. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Thank you @mattdibi and all the team for the dedication. The backend seems indeed easy to face, but the UI may be harder. I think we will wait at least until the release of version 6 to make a more long-lasting effort. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Thanks @mattdibi and all the team for your time reviewing this case ❤️ and support . As we'll need to review the release of version 6.0 (which looks promising btw!) we'll try to address this contribution then. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Hello there @pintify @alexcorvis84,
after reviewing your use-case with my teammates we agree that the IP Forwarding feature doesn't work for your use case. The correct way to address this is to leverage static routes which, currently, Kura doesn't support.
To address this we would need to leverage the
route-datafield exposed by NetworkManager DBus API:which we populate here (look here for 5.6.X version)
The backend change is fairly trivial (update the code above so that it grabs the parameters from the snapshot and populates the outgoing data structure as per NetworkManager expectations... this is how we currently support VLANs). Updating the WebUI to support the routes would require s…