update #6087
update #6087
Conversation
Reviewer's GuideImplements a payment supplement print flow by refactoring the checkout component to include a user info modal, print preview, and new global atoms for state management. Entity relationship diagram for new global atoms in storeerDiagram
userNameAtom ||--o{ UserInfoForm : "used by"
userBankAddressAtom ||--o{ UserInfoForm : "used by"
accountTypeAtom ||--o{ UserInfoForm : "used by"
companyRegisterAtom ||--o{ UserInfoForm : "used by"
printModalOpenAtom ||--o{ SelectPaymentTypeMain : "used by"
UserInfoForm {
string userName
string userBankAddress
string accountType
string companyRegister
}
SelectPaymentTypeMain {
boolean printModalOpen
}
Class diagram for new and updated types in supplement print flowclassDiagram
class SelectPaymentTypeMain {
- showUserForm: boolean
- printRef: Ref<HTMLDivElement>
- userName: string
- userBankAddress: string
- setPrintOpen: function
+ handlePrint()
+ handlePrintClick()
}
class UserInfoForm {
+ onSubmit: () => void
+ onCancel: () => void
- userName: string
- userBankAddress: string
- accountType: 'person' | 'company'
- companyRegister: string
+ isFormValid(): boolean
}
class PrintableSupplement {
+ userName?: string
+ userBankAddress?: string
}
class UserInfo {
- userName: string
- userBankAddress: string
- company: string
- accountType: 'person' | 'company'
- total: number
}
SelectPaymentTypeMain --> UserInfoForm : shows
SelectPaymentTypeMain --> PrintableSupplement : renders
PrintableSupplement --> UserInfo : includes
File-Level Changes
Tips and commandsInteracting with Sourcery
Customizing Your ExperienceAccess your dashboard to:
Getting Help
|
|
Note Other AI code review bot(s) detectedCodeRabbit has detected other AI code review bot(s) in this pull request and will avoid duplicating their findings in the review comments. This may lead to a less comprehensive review. WalkthroughThis change introduces a new invoice supplement printing workflow to the checkout payment module. It adds new React components, hooks, and Jotai atoms to manage user information, print state, and invoice presentation. The update includes utility functions for print styling and template processing, and integrates the print workflow into the payment type selection UI. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant PaymentTypeUI
participant UserInfoForm
participant PrintableSupplement
participant PrintUtils
User->>PaymentTypeUI: Selects "Invoice" payment type
PaymentTypeUI->>UserInfoForm: Opens modal for user info
User->>UserInfoForm: Enters info and submits
UserInfoForm->>PaymentTypeUI: onSubmit triggers print
PaymentTypeUI->>PrintableSupplement: Renders hidden invoice content
PaymentTypeUI->>PrintUtils: Calls printDocument(printRef)
PrintUtils->>User: Opens print dialog with invoice
PrintUtils->>PaymentTypeUI: Returns print status
PaymentTypeUI->>User: Shows success or error message
Estimated code review effort🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~20 minutes Suggested reviewers
Poem
Note ⚡️ Unit Test Generation is now available in beta!Learn more here, or try it out under "Finishing Touches" below. 📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (4)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (4)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hey @ColeGN - I've reviewed your changes and they look great!
Prompt for AI Agents
Please address the comments from this code review:
## Individual Comments
### Comment 1
<location> `pos/modules/checkout/components/paymentType/selectPaymentType.main.tsx:53` </location>
<code_context>
+ if (printWindow) {
+ let printContent = printRef.current.innerHTML;
+
+ printContent = printContent.replace(/{{userName}}/g, userName || "N/A");
+ printContent = printContent.replace(/{{userBankAddress}}/g, userBankAddress || "N/A");
+
+ printWindow.document.write(`
</code_context>
<issue_to_address>
Template variable replacement may be redundant.
If these placeholders are not present in the HTML output, consider removing this replacement logic for clarity.
</issue_to_address>
<suggested_fix>
<<<<<<< SEARCH
let printContent = printRef.current.innerHTML;
printContent = printContent.replace(/{{userName}}/g, userName || "N/A");
printContent = printContent.replace(/{{userBankAddress}}/g, userBankAddress || "N/A");
printWindow.document.write(`
=======
let printContent = printRef.current.innerHTML;
printWindow.document.write(`
>>>>>>> REPLACE
</suggested_fix>
### Comment 2
<location> `pos/modules/checkout/components/paymentType/selectPaymentType.main.tsx:239` </location>
<code_context>
+ />
+ ))}
+
+ <div style={{ display: "none" }}>
+ <PrintableSupplement ref={printRef} />
+ </div>
+
</code_context>
<issue_to_address>
Hidden DOM nodes may impact accessibility and performance.
Consider rendering PrintableSupplement only when printing is required, or explore using a portal or offscreen rendering to avoid unnecessary DOM nodes.
Suggested implementation:
```typescript
{mappedPts.map((payment) => (
<Term
Icon={CoinsIcon}
title={payment.title}
type={payment.type}
key={payment.type}
disabled={payment.disabled || disabledTerms}
/>
))}
{showPrintableSupplement && (
<PrintableSupplement ref={printRef} />
)}
```
```typescript
const SelectPaymentTypeMain = () => {
const [showUserForm, setShowUserForm] = useState(false);
const [showPrintableSupplement, setShowPrintableSupplement] = useState(false);
const printRef = useRef(null);
const {
loadingKhan,
disabledTerms,
} = usePossiblePaymentTerms()
const { getLabel } = usePaymentLabel()
// Example function to trigger printing
const handlePrint = () => {
setShowPrintableSupplement(true);
};
useEffect(() => {
if (showPrintableSupplement && printRef.current) {
// Wait for the component to render, then print
setTimeout(() => {
window.print();
setShowPrintableSupplement(false);
}, 0);
}
}, [showPrintableSupplement]);
```
- You will need to trigger `handlePrint` when you want to print the supplement (e.g., from a button or other event).
- Make sure to import `useRef` and `useEffect` from React if not already imported.
- Adjust the logic in `handlePrint` and the effect as needed to fit your actual print workflow.
</issue_to_address>Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.
pos/modules/checkout/components/paymentType/selectPaymentType.main.tsx
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
pos/modules/checkout/components/paymentType/selectPaymentType.main.tsx
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Caution
Changes requested ❌
Reviewed everything up to 1444624 in 2 minutes and 15 seconds. Click for details.
- Reviewed
570lines of code in5files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
5draft comments. View those below. - Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with 👍 or 👎 to teach Ellipsis.
1. pos/modules/checkout/components/paymentType/selectPaymentType.main.tsx:53
- Draft comment:
The regex replacement for placeholders ({{userName}}, {{userBankAddress}}) in printContent is ineffective since the PrintableSupplement component doesn't include these tokens. Consider removing or updating this logic. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 10% vs. threshold = 50% The code clearly shows placeholder replacement logic being used. However, without seeing the PrintableSupplement component's contents, we can't definitively say whether these placeholders exist or not. The comment makes an assumption about code we can't see. Following our rules, we should not keep comments that require more context to verify. The placeholders could very well exist in the PrintableSupplement component that we can't see. Making assumptions about unseen code could lead to incorrect suggestions. Since we can't verify the presence or absence of these placeholders without seeing the PrintableSupplement component, we should err on the side of assuming the code is correct. Delete the comment since we don't have enough context to verify if the placeholders exist in the PrintableSupplement component.
2. pos/modules/checkout/components/paymentType/selectPaymentType.main.tsx:173
- Draft comment:
The state update 'setPrintOpen(true)' is ambiguous given the naming 'printModalOpenAtom'. Clarify its purpose or consider renaming the atom to reflect its usage post-printing. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 10% vs. threshold = 50% The atom name printModalOpenAtom clearly indicates it controls a modal's open state related to printing. The usage in setPrintOpen(true) after printing makes logical sense - likely showing a confirmation or follow-up modal after print completes. There's no real ambiguity here. The naming follows common React patterns for modal control states. I could be missing some broader context about what this modal actually does. Maybe there's a reason the reviewer found it confusing that isn't apparent in this file. Even without full context, the naming and usage pattern is standard and clear enough. The comment doesn't provide any concrete alternative that would be better. The comment should be deleted. The atom naming is clear and follows conventions, and the usage is logical given the printing context.
3. pos/modules/checkout/components/paymentType/selectPaymentType.main.tsx:51
- Draft comment:
Using innerHTML to capture and print component content can expose XSS risks if any user input is not properly sanitized. Ensure that content rendered via innerHTML is safe. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 20% vs. threshold = 50% The values being inserted (userName and userBankAddress) come from Jotai atoms, not direct user input. The PrintableSupplement component is a controlled internal component. The string replacements are using template literals {{userName}} which suggests this is a designed template system. While innerHTML use can be risky, this seems to be a controlled printing scenario. I could be underestimating the security risk - the atom values could potentially contain malicious content if they're populated from user input elsewhere in the app. The template system could have other injection points I'm not seeing. Without seeing how the atom values are populated or the full template system, I can't be certain there's a real security risk. The comment is speculative without more context. The comment raises a valid concern but is speculative without more context about how the data is populated. Following our rules about speculative comments, it should be removed.
4. pos/modules/checkout/components/paymentType/selectPaymentType.main.tsx:250
- Draft comment:
Typo alert: The button label "Nehemjleh" might be a misspelling or inconsistent with the other Mongolian texts (e.g., "Бэлнээр", "Цахимаар"). If it’s meant to be in Mongolian, consider checking if the intended text should be corrected (for example, to "Нэхэмжлэх"). - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 0% vs. threshold = 50% While the comment appears technically correct about the script inconsistency, this is a UI text change. According to the rules, we should "NOT comment on any pure frontend UI or styling changes, only logic. Assume that if the author changed the UI, they did it correctly." The choice of script for UI text is a UI decision that should be left to the author. The text inconsistency could cause confusion for users if some labels are in Latin script while others are in Cyrillic. This might be a UX issue rather than just a UI styling issue. Even if it affects UX, the rules explicitly state to trust the author on UI decisions. We don't have enough context to know if there's a valid reason for using different scripts in different places. The comment should be deleted as it relates to UI text choices, which according to the rules should be left to the author's discretion.
5. pos/modules/checkout/components/paymentType/userInfoFrom.tsx:103
- Draft comment:
There appears to be a typographical error in the button label 'Nehemjlel uusgeh'. Please verify the intended text. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful =50%<= threshold50%The comment points out a potential typographical error in a button label. It asks the author to verify the intended text, which is not allowed according to the rules. However, it does suggest that there might be a mistake, which could be useful for the author to know. The comment could be rephrased to suggest a correction instead of asking for verification.
Workflow ID: wflow_bdzpqzUGb2ea9Mwc
You can customize by changing your verbosity settings, reacting with 👍 or 👎, replying to comments, or adding code review rules.
pos/modules/checkout/components/paymentType/selectPaymentType.main.tsx
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 5
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
pos/modules/checkout/components/paymentType/selectPaymentType.main.tsx (1)
239-241: Consider moving the hidden component outside the grid layout.The hidden
PrintableSupplementcomponent is placed inside the grid layout, which is semantically incorrect since it's not part of the visible UI.Move it outside the grid:
</div> + <div style={{ display: "none" }}> + <PrintableSupplement ref={printRef} /> + </div> + <div className="grid grid-cols-2 gap-2"> {/* ... payment options ... */} - <div style={{ display: "none" }}> - <PrintableSupplement ref={printRef} /> - </div>pos/modules/checkout/components/paymentType/userInfoFrom.tsx (2)
27-33: Enhance form validation for better user experience.The current validation only checks for non-empty trimmed strings. Consider adding more robust validation for better UX.
Add more comprehensive validation:
const isFormValid = () => { - const baseValid = userName.trim() && userBankAddress.trim(); + const baseValid = userName.trim().length >= 2 && userBankAddress.trim().length >= 5; if (accountType === "company") { - return baseValid && companyRegister.trim(); + return baseValid && companyRegister.trim().length >= 3; } return baseValid; };
85-95: Consider adding input validation for bank address format.The bank address field accepts any text, but bank addresses typically have specific formats. Consider adding pattern validation or input formatting.
Add pattern validation:
<Input id="bankAddress" type="text" value={userBankAddress} onChange={(e) => setUserBankAddress(e.target.value)} placeholder="Enter your bank address" className="mt-1 text-black" + pattern="[0-9]{8,20}" + title="Bank address should be 8-20 digits" required />
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
pos/modules/checkout/components/paymentType/selectPaymentType.main.tsx(3 hunks)pos/modules/checkout/components/paymentType/supplement.tsx(1 hunks)pos/modules/checkout/components/paymentType/userInfo.tsx(1 hunks)pos/modules/checkout/components/paymentType/userInfoFrom.tsx(1 hunks)pos/store/index.tsx(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (1)
pos/modules/checkout/components/paymentType/selectPaymentType.main.tsx (1)
pos/store/index.tsx (3)
userNameAtom(54-54)userBankAddressAtom(55-55)printModalOpenAtom(59-59)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (3)
- GitHub Check: pos-ui
- GitHub Check: runtest
- GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript-typescript)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
pos/modules/checkout/components/paymentType/userInfo.tsx (1)
35-37: Verify “MN” Prefix and Clarify Field Label
The UI always prepends “MN” to the value stored in userBankAddress. Please confirm with your requirements that all Mongolian bank account numbers must include the “MN” country code and that users will only enter the raw digits (otherwise you may end up with doubled prefixes).Additionally, the input in userInfoFrom.tsx is labeled and ID’d as “Bank Address” (id=“bankAddress”), but it actually captures the account number. Consider renaming this to “Account Number” (and updating its id) to avoid confusion.
Locations to review:
- pos/modules/checkout/components/paymentType/userInfo.tsx (lines 33–37)
- pos/modules/checkout/components/paymentType/userInfoFrom.tsx (the bankAddress field)
pos/modules/checkout/components/paymentType/selectPaymentType.main.tsx
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
pos/modules/checkout/components/paymentType/userInfoForm.tsx (1)
97-114: Consider internationalization for hardcoded text.The button text "Nehemjlel uusgeh" appears to be hardcoded in what looks like Mongolian. Consider using an internationalization system for better maintainability and multi-language support.
- Nehemjlel uusgeh + {t('userInfoForm.submit') || 'Nehemjlel uusgeh'}
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
pos/modules/checkout/components/paymentType/selectPaymentType.main.tsx(3 hunks)pos/modules/checkout/components/paymentType/supplement.tsx(1 hunks)pos/modules/checkout/components/paymentType/userInfo.tsx(1 hunks)pos/modules/checkout/components/paymentType/userInfoForm.tsx(1 hunks)pos/store/index.tsx(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (4)
- pos/modules/checkout/components/paymentType/supplement.tsx
- pos/modules/checkout/components/paymentType/userInfo.tsx
- pos/modules/checkout/components/paymentType/selectPaymentType.main.tsx
- pos/store/index.tsx
🔇 Additional comments (7)
pos/modules/checkout/components/paymentType/userInfoForm.tsx (7)
1-15: LGTM! Clean imports and type definitions.The imports are well-organized and the TypeScript interface and type definitions are clear and appropriate.
16-21: LGTM! Proper state management with Jotai.The state management using Jotai atoms is implemented correctly and follows the established pattern in the codebase.
22-25: LGTM! Clean form submission handler.The form submission handler correctly prevents default behavior and delegates to the parent component.
27-33: LGTM! Solid validation logic.The validation correctly handles different account types and uses
trim()to prevent whitespace-only submissions.
35-52: LGTM! Well-structured modal with good accessibility.The modal structure is well-implemented with proper backdrop, centering, and semantic HTML. The form controls have appropriate labels for accessibility.
54-82: LGTM! Good conditional rendering and dynamic labels.The conditional rendering for company-specific fields is well-implemented, and the dynamic labels based on account type enhance user experience.
119-120: LGTM! Standard export.Clean default export following React conventions.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Caution
Changes requested ❌
Reviewed 2b24759 in 1 minute and 48 seconds. Click for details.
- Reviewed
506lines of code in5files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
4draft comments. View those below. - Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with 👍 or 👎 to teach Ellipsis.
1. pos/modules/checkout/components/paymentType/selectPaymentType.main.tsx:288
- Draft comment:
A comment explaining why PrintableSupplement is conditionally rendered (using shouldShowPrintable) would help maintainability. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:50%<= threshold50%None
2. pos/modules/checkout/components/paymentType/userInfo.tsx:38
- Draft comment:
Ensure the 'MN' prefix for the bank account is handled consistently; the display prepends 'MN' but the form input does not. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.
3. pos/modules/checkout/components/paymentType/userInfo.tsx:19
- Draft comment:
Memoizing transactionDate ensures consistency, but consider if the transaction time should update if there's a delay in printing. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:50%<= threshold50%None
4. pos/modules/checkout/components/paymentType/supplement.tsx:14
- Draft comment:
There appears to be an extra whitespace character in the className attribute (" gap-4"). Consider removing the extra leading space to ensure consistent styling. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was on unchanged code.
Workflow ID: wflow_lKRKxQJSj4IsLcFO
You can customize by changing your verbosity settings, reacting with 👍 or 👎, replying to comments, or adding code review rules.
pos/modules/checkout/components/paymentType/selectPaymentType.main.tsx
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
pos/modules/checkout/components/paymentType/selectPaymentType.main.tsx
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Caution
Changes requested ❌
Reviewed 782934e in 2 minutes and 37 seconds. Click for details.
- Reviewed
188lines of code in1files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
6draft comments. View those below. - Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with 👍 or 👎 to teach Ellipsis.
1. pos/modules/checkout/components/paymentType/selectPaymentType.main.tsx:151
- Draft comment:
Using alert() here can be disruptive. Consider using non‐blocking notifications (e.g. toast messages) for error feedback. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 20% vs. threshold = 50% Alert() is blocking and forces user acknowledgment, which can be appropriate for critical errors that prevent core functionality. However, toast notifications are more modern and less disruptive. In this case, since the user needs to know why their print attempt failed and potentially take action (try again), a non-blocking toast might actually be less effective than an alert. The comment assumes toast notifications are always better, but blocking alerts can be appropriate for critical errors where user acknowledgment is important. The current alert ensures the user knows why printing failed. While toast notifications are generally more modern, in this specific case the blocking nature of alert() serves a valid purpose by ensuring the user understands why their print attempt failed. The current alert() implementation is actually appropriate for this use case since it's a critical error that requires user attention and potential action. The comment should be deleted.
2. pos/modules/checkout/components/paymentType/selectPaymentType.main.tsx:161
- Draft comment:
Using alert() to notify that the print window was blocked may not be ideal. Consider a less intrusive UI notification. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 20% vs. threshold = 50% While alerts are somewhat outdated and intrusive, in this case it's being used for a critical error that requires user action (enabling popups). A modal or toast might be more modern but wouldn't necessarily improve the user experience significantly since the user needs to take action anyway. The current implementation is functional and clear. The comment has merit from a modern UI perspective. Alerts are considered outdated and can be jarring to users. However, this is an error case that requires immediate user attention and action. The alert() is a simple, universally understood way to communicate this critical information. The comment should be deleted. While using a more modern notification system could be nice, the current solution is functional and appropriate for this error case. The suggested change isn't important enough to warrant a comment.
3. pos/modules/checkout/components/paymentType/selectPaymentType.main.tsx:193
- Draft comment:
The fallback logic using a 2000ms timeout to trigger print and close the window might conflict with the printWindow 'load' event handler. Verify that duplicate print calls do not occur on slower devices. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 20% vs. threshold = 50% The fallback print is actually a safety mechanism that only executes if the window is still open after 2 seconds, suggesting the first print failed. The check for !printWindow.closed prevents duplicate prints if the first one succeeded. This is a reasonable pattern for handling print reliability issues across different browsers and devices. I could be wrong about the race conditions - there might be edge cases where both prints trigger nearly simultaneously before the window closes. Even if both print dialogs appeared, this would be better than the print failing entirely. The code has proper error handling and cleanup in both cases. The comment raises a speculative concern about an edge case, but the code appears to handle print reliability appropriately with proper guards against duplicates.
4. pos/modules/checkout/components/paymentType/selectPaymentType.main.tsx:271
- Draft comment:
A 50ms delay in handlePrintClick before showing the user form is used. Please document why this delay is necessary, as arbitrary timeouts can lead to unpredictable behavior on slower devices. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 20% vs. threshold = 50% While documenting timeouts can be helpful, this seems like a minor implementation detail for UI state management. The timeout is very short (50ms) and appears to be just giving React a chance to process the state reset before showing new UI. This is a common pattern in React for handling state transitions. The comment is asking for documentation of something that's likely just an implementation detail. The timeout could potentially cause issues on very slow devices. Having documentation could help future maintainers understand the purpose. The timeout is so short (50ms) that it's clearly just for UI state management. If it was a longer timeout or had complex business logic implications, documentation would be more important. This comment should be deleted as it's asking for documentation of a minor implementation detail that's using a common React pattern for state transitions.
5. pos/modules/checkout/components/paymentType/selectPaymentType.main.tsx:164
- Draft comment:
Using innerHTML along with replaceTemplateVariables without sanitizing user inputs might expose you to XSS risks. Ensure proper HTML escaping or sanitization for user-provided data. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.
6. pos/modules/checkout/components/paymentType/selectPaymentType.main.tsx:185
- Draft comment:
Event listeners for 'beforeprint' and 'afterprint' are added to the print window but never removed. While the window is closed soon, consider cleaning up these listeners to avoid potential memory issues. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 10% vs. threshold = 50% The window is closed in multiple ways: 1) handleAfterPrint closes it after printing 2) fallback timeout closes it after 2 seconds 3) resetPrintStates is called in multiple places. When the window is closed, the event listeners are automatically cleaned up by the browser. Adding explicit cleanup would be unnecessary since the window's lifetime is very short and well-controlled. The comment raises a valid general programming practice about cleaning up event listeners. In some cases, not removing listeners could cause memory leaks. In this specific case, the window is temporary and gets closed quickly, either through normal printing flow or fallback timeouts. The browser will clean up the listeners automatically when the window closes. The comment should be deleted as it suggests fixing a non-issue. The current implementation is correct since the print window's lifecycle is well-managed and browser handles cleanup automatically.
Workflow ID: wflow_rXwEl0T7xaqY1vZh
You can customize by changing your verbosity settings, reacting with 👍 or 👎, replying to comments, or adding code review rules.
pos/modules/checkout/components/paymentType/selectPaymentType.main.tsx
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Caution
Changes requested ❌
Reviewed 48064c3 in 1 minute and 52 seconds. Click for details.
- Reviewed
601lines of code in4files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
3draft comments. View those below. - Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with 👍 or 👎 to teach Ellipsis.
1. pos/modules/checkout/components/paymentType/selectPaymentType.main.tsx:54
- Draft comment:
Review print handling: ensure that event listeners and setTimeouts do not lead to duplicate print triggers. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:33%<= threshold50%None
2. pos/modules/checkout/hooks/usePrintSupplement.tsx:43
- Draft comment:
Review duplicate print calls: the printWindow.print() is invoked both in the load event listener and via a fallback timeout, which may trigger duplicate dialogs. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 20% vs. threshold = 50% The second print() call appears to be an intentional fallback mechanism in case the first one fails. The 2000ms delay and window.closed check suggests this is a deliberate design pattern. The try-catch and error logging around the fallback also indicates this is intentional error handling rather than a mistake. The comment raises a valid concern about potential duplicate print dialogs. There could be race conditions where both print calls execute. The code appears to have safeguards (checking if window is closed, error handling) and the timing differences (200ms vs 2000ms) make this an intentional fallback pattern rather than a bug. This appears to be an intentional fallback mechanism rather than a bug. The comment should be removed as it misinterprets a deliberate design pattern as an issue.
3. pos/modules/checkout/utils/printUtils.ts:103
- Draft comment:
Consider sanitizing user-supplied data in replaceTemplateVariables to mitigate potential XSS risks. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:33%<= threshold50%None
Workflow ID: wflow_qKi15uX7X7ECKJKo
You can customize by changing your verbosity settings, reacting with 👍 or 👎, replying to comments, or adding code review rules.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
pos/modules/checkout/utils/printUtils.ts (1)
1-97: Consider using TailwindCSS print utilities or CSS modules to avoid class name conflicts.The hard-coded CSS utility classes may conflict with existing TailwindCSS classes in your application. Consider using TailwindCSS's built-in print utilities or CSS modules for better maintainability.
Alternative approach using TailwindCSS print utilities:
-const PRINT_STYLES = ` - body { - font-family: Arial, sans-serif; - margin: 20px; - color: black; - line-height: 1.6; - } - .bg-gray-50 { - background-color: #f9f9f9; - padding: 16px; - border-radius: 8px; - margin-bottom: 16px; - } - // ... rest of styles -` +const PRINT_STYLES = ` + @media print { + body { + font-family: Arial, sans-serif; + margin: 20px; + color: black; + line-height: 1.6; + } + .print-bg-gray { + background-color: #f5f5f5 !important; + padding: 16px; + border-radius: 8px; + margin-bottom: 16px; + } + // ... use unique print-specific class names + } +`pos/modules/checkout/hooks/usePrintSupplement.tsx (1)
53-68: Consider simplifying the fallback timeout logic.The nested setTimeout structure is complex and may create race conditions. The 2-second delay might negatively impact user experience.
Consider a cleaner approach:
- setTimeout(() => { - if (printWindow && !printWindow.closed) { - try { - printWindow.print() - } catch (e) { - console.error('Fallback print failed:', e) - } - setTimeout(() => { - try { - printWindow.close() - } catch (e) { - console.error('Failed to close print window:', e) - } - }, 500) - } - }, 2000) + // Fallback cleanup after shorter timeout + setTimeout(() => { + if (printWindow && !printWindow.closed) { + try { + printWindow.close() + } catch (e) { + console.error('Failed to close print window:', e) + } + } + }, 1000)pos/modules/checkout/hooks/usePaymentStates.tsx (1)
16-22: Consider adding a comment for the 50ms timeout.The implementation is sound, but the 50ms delay could benefit from a comment explaining its purpose (likely for DOM/state settling).
const startPrint = useCallback(() => { resetStates() + // Short delay to ensure state reset is processed before showing UI setTimeout(() => { setShouldShowPrintable(true) setShowUserForm(true) }, 50) }, [resetStates])
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
pos/modules/checkout/components/paymentType/selectPaymentType.main.tsx(3 hunks)pos/modules/checkout/hooks/usePaymentStates.tsx(1 hunks)pos/modules/checkout/hooks/usePrintSupplement.tsx(1 hunks)pos/modules/checkout/utils/printUtils.ts(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- pos/modules/checkout/components/paymentType/selectPaymentType.main.tsx
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (1)
pos/modules/checkout/hooks/usePrintSupplement.tsx (2)
pos/store/index.tsx (3)
userNameAtom(54-54)userBankAddressAtom(55-55)printModalOpenAtom(59-59)pos/modules/checkout/utils/printUtils.ts (2)
replaceTemplateVariables(99-107)createPrintDocument(109-122)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (3)
- GitHub Check: runtest
- GitHub Check: pos-ui
- GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript-typescript)
🔇 Additional comments (13)
pos/modules/checkout/utils/printUtils.ts (2)
99-107: Function implementation looks correct.The template variable replacement logic is sound and handles falsy values appropriately with the "N/A" fallback.
109-122: LGTM! Clean HTML document generation.The function properly wraps content in a complete HTML document structure with embedded styles, perfect for printing use cases.
pos/modules/checkout/hooks/usePrintSupplement.tsx (5)
1-8: LGTM! Clean imports and state setup.The hook properly imports required dependencies and sets up Jotai atom values and setters for state management.
10-14: Good validation and error handling.Proper null check for the print reference with clear error messaging and logging.
16-33: Excellent popup handling and content processing.The code properly handles popup blocking scenarios and processes template variables before writing to the print window. Good use of document.open/write/close pattern.
35-51: Well-structured event handling for print lifecycle.The beforeprint/afterprint event listeners with proper state management and the 200ms delay for content loading are well thought out.
70-79: Solid error handling with proper cleanup.Good exception handling with state cleanup and consistent return format for both success and error cases.
pos/modules/checkout/hooks/usePaymentStates.tsx (6)
1-7: Clean state management setup.Well-defined state variables with clear naming and appropriate types for managing the payment printing workflow.
9-14: LGTM! Proper state reset implementation.Good use of useCallback with appropriate empty dependency array for the reset function.
24-38: Well-designed print lifecycle handlers.The state transitions are logical and the 500ms delay in handlePrintSuccess allows for proper user feedback before resetting states.
40-42: LGTM! Clean cancellation implementation.Simple and effective cancel function that immediately resets all states.
44-48: Good cleanup pattern.Proper useEffect cleanup to reset states on unmount, preventing potential state leaks.
50-64: Excellent hook API design.Well-organized return object with clear separation between states and actions, making it easy for consuming components to use.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Important
Looks good to me! 👍
Reviewed 73a1433 in 1 minute and 59 seconds. Click for details.
- Reviewed
79lines of code in1files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
4draft comments. View those below. - Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with 👍 or 👎 to teach Ellipsis.
1. pos/modules/checkout/hooks/usePrintSupplement.tsx:11
- Draft comment:
Consider using 'ReturnType' instead of 'NodeJS.Timeout' for timersRef to match the browser environment’s setTimeout return type. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 20% vs. threshold = 50% While technically correct that ReturnType is more precise for browser environments, NodeJS.Timeout is also commonly used and works fine. The code functions correctly either way. This seems like a minor typing preference rather than a significant issue requiring change. The suggestion could improve type precision and maintainability. Browser-specific types might be preferable in a frontend codebase. However, the current type works correctly and the change would be purely cosmetic with no functional impact. The comment doesn't highlight a real problem that needs fixing. This comment should be removed as it suggests a minor typing preference change rather than fixing a real issue.
2. pos/modules/checkout/hooks/usePrintSupplement.tsx:69
- Draft comment:
Event listeners are attached anonymously to printWindow on 'load'. It might be beneficial to store and remove them explicitly to prevent potential memory leaks, especially if the print window persists unexpectedly. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:50%<= threshold50%None
3. pos/modules/checkout/hooks/usePrintSupplement.tsx:78
- Draft comment:
The fallback logic calls printWindow.print() a second time. Confirm that this redundancy is intentional; you may add a guard to prevent multiple print invocations if not. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was on unchanged code.
4. pos/modules/checkout/hooks/usePrintSupplement.tsx:108
- Draft comment:
Please add a newline at the end of the file to adhere to best practices. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:30%<= threshold50%None
Workflow ID: wflow_rGXLZwUJodwrVyQY
You can customize by changing your verbosity settings, reacting with 👍 or 👎, replying to comments, or adding code review rules.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Important
Looks good to me! 👍
Reviewed 47135a7 in 1 minute and 17 seconds. Click for details.
- Reviewed
448lines of code in5files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
5draft comments. View those below. - Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with 👍 or 👎 to teach Ellipsis.
1. pos/modules/checkout/components/paymentType/selectPaymentType.main.tsx:141
- Draft comment:
The button text update to 'Complete Payment & Print' and 'Processing Payment...' improves feedback. Ensure the onClick (startPrint) properly aligns with opening the user modal before printing. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:33%<= threshold50%None
2. pos/modules/checkout/components/paymentType/supplement.tsx:8
- Draft comment:
The PrintableSupplement component now uses updated styling for a modern invoice look. Verify that these inline styles are consistent with other printed documents. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:0%<= threshold50%None
3. pos/modules/checkout/components/paymentType/userInfo.tsx:24
- Draft comment:
The UserInfo component now features a detailed invoice layout with an order details table. Consider consolidating inline styles into CSS classes for improved maintainability, and ensure using static dates via useMemo aligns with user expectations. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:33%<= threshold50%None
4. pos/modules/checkout/hooks/usePaymentStates.tsx:25
- Draft comment:
State transitions in startPrint and handlePrintSuccess use setTimeout which may be brittle if printing delays occur. Consider basing state changes on actual print event callbacks if available. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:50%<= threshold50%None
5. pos/modules/checkout/utils/printUtils.ts:104
- Draft comment:
The print styles have been expanded with new rules for blue and green themes. Confirm that these styles integrate well with the overall printed document and do not conflict with global styles. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:0%<= threshold50%None
Workflow ID: wflow_HxGSykjpxrOTEQo6
You can customize by changing your verbosity settings, reacting with 👍 or 👎, replying to comments, or adding code review rules.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
pos/modules/checkout/components/paymentType/userInfo.tsx (2)
28-51: Consider styling consistency and data validation improvements.While the conditional rendering logic is sound, consider these improvements:
- Styling inconsistency: Mixing inline styles with Tailwind classes reduces maintainability.
- Data validation: Add null checks for user data to prevent rendering issues.
- Hardcoded prefix: The "MN" prefix for bank addresses may not be flexible for future requirements.
Consider this refactor for better consistency:
- <div style={{ - padding: '8px', - backgroundColor: 'white', - color: '#111827', - }}> + <div className="p-2 bg-white text-gray-900"> <h2 className="text-lg font-semibold text-gray-800">Нэхэмжлэл гаргах мэдээлэл</h2> <div className="space-y-2 text-sm"> <p> - <strong>{isCompany ? "Байгууллагын нэр:" : "Овог, нэр:"}</strong> {userName} + <strong>{isCompany ? "Байгууллагын нэр:" : "Овог, нэр:"}</strong> {userName || 'Тодорхойгүй'} </p>
226-240: Clean up redundant signature lines.The signature section has both a styled border-bottom div and an underscore line, which is redundant.
<p style={{ fontWeight: 'bold', marginBottom: '8px' }}>Гарын үсэг:</p> <div style={{ width: '192px', height: '24px', borderBottom: '1px solid #9ca3af', }}></div> <p style={{ fontSize: '12px', color: '#6b7280' }}>Нэхэмжлэл гаргасан</p> - <p>_________________________</p>
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
pos/modules/checkout/components/paymentType/selectPaymentType.main.tsx(3 hunks)pos/modules/checkout/components/paymentType/supplement.tsx(1 hunks)pos/modules/checkout/components/paymentType/userInfo.tsx(1 hunks)pos/modules/checkout/hooks/usePaymentStates.tsx(1 hunks)pos/modules/checkout/utils/printUtils.ts(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (4)
- pos/modules/checkout/hooks/usePaymentStates.tsx
- pos/modules/checkout/utils/printUtils.ts
- pos/modules/checkout/components/paymentType/supplement.tsx
- pos/modules/checkout/components/paymentType/selectPaymentType.main.tsx
🔇 Additional comments (4)
pos/modules/checkout/components/paymentType/userInfo.tsx (4)
1-15: LGTM! Well-organized imports.The imports are properly structured with client directive, necessary hooks, state management, and utility functions all appropriately imported.
16-26: Excellent implementation of previous feedback!The transaction date is now properly memoized, addressing the previous review comment. The deadline calculation using
addDaysis clean and the derivedisCompanyboolean improves code readability.
180-192: Payment summary logic is sound.The conditional text rendering based on account type is well implemented, and the dynamic content insertion is appropriate for the invoice context.
194-224: Well-implemented date handling with proper memoization.The transaction date and deadline calculations are correctly memoized and formatted. The 14-day payment term is clearly communicated with appropriate visual emphasis.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Important
Looks good to me! 👍
Reviewed fb9cff5 in 1 minute and 25 seconds. Click for details.
- Reviewed
716lines of code in3files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
3draft comments. View those below. - Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with 👍 or 👎 to teach Ellipsis.
1. pos/modules/checkout/components/paymentType/userInfo.tsx:15
- Draft comment:
Good use of usePrintStyles to centralize styling. Ensure all required style properties are present. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:0%<= threshold50%None
2. pos/modules/checkout/hooks/usePrintStyles.tsx:30
- Draft comment:
Well-structured style definitions using useMemo; clear separation of theme, typography, and spacing. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:0%<= threshold50%None
3. pos/modules/checkout/hooks/usePrintSupplement.tsx:69
- Draft comment:
The safeWindowOperation wrapper efficiently handles window errors. Verify that the fallback timers (200ms and 2000ms) do not trigger duplicate print calls in some browsers. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:33%<= threshold50%None
Workflow ID: wflow_Wcm1nqHG44vBby9c
You can customize by changing your verbosity settings, reacting with 👍 or 👎, replying to comments, or adding code review rules.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Caution
Changes requested ❌
Reviewed 87de95d in 1 minute and 33 seconds. Click for details.
- Reviewed
264lines of code in3files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
4draft comments. View those below. - Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with 👍 or 👎 to teach Ellipsis.
1. pos/modules/checkout/components/paymentType/userInfo.tsx:64
- Draft comment:
New column header 'НӨАТ-гүй үнэ' added; ensure the VAT-free price calculation (total/1.1, rounded) meets business requirements. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:50%<= threshold50%None
2. pos/modules/checkout/components/paymentType/userInfo.tsx:127
- Draft comment:
Review rounding strategy for currency values; Math.round may not be adequate for financial precision. Consider a more robust currency formatting approach if needed. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:50%<= threshold50%None
3. pos/modules/checkout/hooks/usePrintStyles.tsx:259
- Draft comment:
Removal of commented labels cleans up the code; consider keeping minimal inline documentation for complex style objects for future maintainability. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:30%<= threshold50%None
4. pos/modules/checkout/hooks/usePrintSupplement.tsx:64
- Draft comment:
The schedulePrintActions function triggers two print commands using timers. Consider adding a flag or check to avoid duplicate print dialogs in browsers where one print might already have been initiated. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 10% vs. threshold = 50% The code appears to be intentionally designed with a fallback print mechanism, likely to handle cases where the first print attempt fails. The safeWindowOperation and event listeners already provide protection against issues. The suggestion to add a flag might actually break the fallback functionality. The current implementation seems robust and intentional. I might be overlooking browser-specific edge cases where both print attempts could trigger simultaneously. The 2000ms timeout might be too short for some scenarios. The existing code already has safeguards, and the fallback mechanism is likely necessary for reliability. Adding a flag could make the system less robust by preventing the fallback from working when needed. The comment should be deleted as it suggests a change that could break the intentional fallback mechanism, and the code already has appropriate safeguards in place.
Workflow ID: wflow_CPzDUzhAzkNQcAz1
You can customize by changing your verbosity settings, reacting with 👍 or 👎, replying to comments, or adding code review rules.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Important
Looks good to me! 👍
Reviewed 14c63c5 in 1 minute and 25 seconds. Click for details.
- Reviewed
137lines of code in1files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
3draft comments. View those below. - Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with 👍 or 👎 to teach Ellipsis.
1. pos/modules/checkout/hooks/usePrintSupplement.tsx:18
- Draft comment:
Consider wrapping the cleanup function in a block (e.g.useEffect(() => { return clearAllTimers; }, [])) for clarity. WhileuseEffect(() => clearAllTimers, [])works, the explicit return makes the intent clearer. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:33%<= threshold50%None
2. pos/modules/checkout/hooks/usePrintSupplement.tsx:68
- Draft comment:
The print action (doPrint) is scheduled twice (lines 69 and 72) as part of a fallback mechanism. Consider adding a comment to clarify this design decision. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful =0%<= threshold50%The comment suggests adding a comment to clarify a design decision, which is not allowed by the rules. It doesn't provide a specific code suggestion or ask for a test to be written. It also doesn't point out a potential issue or ask for confirmation of an intentional design choice. Therefore, it should be removed.
3. pos/modules/checkout/hooks/usePrintSupplement.tsx:82
- Draft comment:
The 'load' event listener added in setupLoadHandler is never removed. While this might not be an issue due to the window closing soon, consider removing the listener after it fires to avoid potential unintended multiple invocations. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:33%<= threshold50%None
Workflow ID: wflow_EjqJhOX15XW46RpH
You can customize by changing your verbosity settings, reacting with 👍 or 👎, replying to comments, or adding code review rules.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
pos/modules/checkout/hooks/usePrintSupplement.tsx (1)
39-44: Using deprecated document.write API.The
document.writemethod is deprecated. However, for print windows, this is still a common pattern as alternatives are limited.
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
pos/modules/checkout/hooks/usePrintSupplement.tsx (2)
68-75: Multiple print attempts may indicate browser compatibility issues.The code schedules print operations at 200ms and 2000ms. Consider documenting why these specific delays and multiple attempts are necessary, as this suggests workarounds for browser-specific behaviors.
6-130: Consider making print delays configurable and adding unit tests.The hardcoded delays (200ms, 500ms, 2000ms) could be made configurable through hook parameters or constants to allow tuning for different environments. Additionally, this complex hook would benefit from unit tests to ensure reliability across different scenarios.
Would you like me to help create unit tests for this hook or refactor it to accept configuration options?
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
pos/modules/checkout/hooks/usePrintSupplement.tsx(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (1)
pos/modules/checkout/hooks/usePrintSupplement.tsx (2)
pos/store/index.tsx (3)
userNameAtom(54-54)userBankAddressAtom(55-55)printModalOpenAtom(59-59)pos/modules/checkout/utils/printUtils.ts (2)
replaceTemplateVariables(120-128)createPrintDocument(130-143)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (3)
- GitHub Check: pos-ui
- GitHub Check: runtest
- GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript-typescript)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
pos/modules/checkout/hooks/usePrintSupplement.tsx (5)
1-11: Imports and hook setup look good.The imports are well-organized and the use of a Set to track timers is a good choice for managing multiple timeouts.
13-27: Timer management implementation is solid.The timer cleanup pattern prevents memory leaks and the self-removing timer logic is well implemented.
82-89: Good implementation of load event handling.The readyState check before adding the load listener properly addresses potential race conditions, as suggested in previous reviews.
91-124: Well-structured print function with comprehensive error handling.The function properly validates inputs, handles popup blockers, and provides clear error messages. The consistent return format with success/error is good for consumer code.
126-130: Clean hook interface.Exposing both the print function and timer cleanup provides good control to consumers.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Important
Looks good to me! 👍
Reviewed 7f3d8df in 35 seconds. Click for details.
- Reviewed
13lines of code in1files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
1draft comments. View those below. - Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with 👍 or 👎 to teach Ellipsis.
1. pos/modules/checkout/components/paymentType/selectPaymentType.main.tsx:142
- Draft comment:
The button label has been changed to a hardcoded Mongolian text ('Нэхэмжлэл'). Consider using a localization approach to dynamically handle different languages. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:33%<= threshold50%None
Workflow ID: wflow_1211t773vQRuY2xc
You can customize by changing your verbosity settings, reacting with 👍 or 👎, replying to comments, or adding code review rules.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Important
Looks good to me! 👍
Reviewed d079e2d in 43 seconds. Click for details.
- Reviewed
31lines of code in1files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
3draft comments. View those below. - Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with 👍 or 👎 to teach Ellipsis.
1. pos/modules/checkout/components/paymentType/userInfoForm.tsx:42
- Draft comment:
The label 'Type' might be too ambiguous – consider reverting to 'Account Type' for clarity. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:33%<= threshold50%None
2. pos/modules/checkout/components/paymentType/userInfoForm.tsx:85
- Draft comment:
Verify if 'Bank Account' correctly reflects the intended input, as it was 'Bank Address' previously. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:33%<= threshold50%None
3. pos/modules/checkout/components/paymentType/userInfoForm.tsx:103
- Draft comment:
Ensure the new button text 'Create invoice' aligns with the application's localization and UX guidelines. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:33%<= threshold50%None
Workflow ID: wflow_UgfhrbtoNWRZscHc
You can customize by changing your verbosity settings, reacting with 👍 or 👎, replying to comments, or adding code review rules.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Important
Looks good to me! 👍
Reviewed f921388 in 1 minute and 54 seconds. Click for details.
- Reviewed
345lines of code in7files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
7draft comments. View those below. - Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with 👍 or 👎 to teach Ellipsis.
1. pos/modules/checkout/components/paymentType/invoiceInfo.tsx:189
- Draft comment:
Ensure the file ends with a newline for consistency. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was on unchanged code.
2. pos/modules/checkout/components/paymentType/invoiceInfoForm.tsx:39
- Draft comment:
Localize the modal header text; 'User Information' is in English while other texts use Mongolian. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.
3. pos/modules/checkout/components/paymentType/invoiceInfoForm.tsx:127
- Draft comment:
Consider localizing the 'Cancel' button label to match the Mongolian text used elsewhere. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.
4. pos/modules/checkout/components/paymentType/invoiceInfoForm.tsx:135
- Draft comment:
For consistency, rename the default export from 'UserInfoForm' to 'InvoiceInfoForm' to match the file name. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.
5. pos/modules/checkout/components/paymentType/selectPaymentType.main.tsx:169
- Draft comment:
Consider unifying naming: 'startPrint' (used to trigger the invoice flow) versus 'handlePrint' (for printing) may be confusing. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was on unchanged code.
6. pos/modules/checkout/hooks/useInvoicePrintSupplement.tsx:69
- Draft comment:
Double print invocation is scheduled (after 200ms and again after 2000ms); confirm if this behavior is intentional. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.
7. pos/modules/checkout/components/paymentType/invoiceInfo.tsx:189
- Draft comment:
It appears that the component is defined asUserInfo(see the declaration above), but the default export is changed toInvoiceInfo. If this change is intended, please update the component’s name for consistency. Otherwise, it might be a typographical error. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment looked like it was already resolved.
Workflow ID: wflow_Io86lrvcV5wapSdl
You can customize by changing your verbosity settings, reacting with 👍 or 👎, replying to comments, or adding code review rules.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
pos/modules/checkout/components/paymentType/invoiceInfoForm.tsx (2)
14-14: Remove redundant type definition.The
AccountTypetype is already defined in theaccountTypeAtomand is redundant here.-type AccountType = "person" | "company";The type can be inferred from the atom or imported if needed elsewhere.
98-111: Improve number input validation and user feedback.The payment deadline input should handle invalid values better and provide clearer feedback to users.
Consider adding client-side validation feedback:
<div> <Label htmlFor="expiryDays" className="text-black">Payment Deadline (Days)</Label> <Input id="expiryDays" type="number" min="1" max="365" value={expiryDays} - onChange={(e) => setExpiryDays(Number(e.target.value))} + onChange={(e) => { + const value = Number(e.target.value); + if (value >= 1 && value <= 365) { + setExpiryDays(value); + } + }} placeholder="Enter payment deadline in days" className="mt-1 text-black" required /> + {(expiryDays < 1 || expiryDays > 365) && ( + <p className="text-red-500 text-xs mt-1">Please enter a value between 1 and 365 days</p> + )} </div>pos/modules/checkout/components/paymentType/invoiceInfo.tsx (1)
102-105: Consider making VAT rate configurable.The hardcoded VAT calculation (dividing by 1.1) assumes a fixed 10% VAT rate. This might need to be configurable for different regions or product types.
Consider extracting the VAT rate to a constant or configuration:
+const VAT_RATE = 0.1; // 10% +const VAT_MULTIPLIER = 1 + VAT_RATE; {cartItems.map((item, index) => { const totalItemPrice = item.count * item.unitPrice; - const withoutVatPrice = totalItemPrice / 1.1; + const withoutVatPrice = totalItemPrice / VAT_MULTIPLIER;
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
pos/modules/checkout/components/paymentType/invoiceInfo.tsx(1 hunks)pos/modules/checkout/components/paymentType/invoiceInfoForm.tsx(1 hunks)pos/modules/checkout/components/paymentType/selectPaymentType.main.tsx(5 hunks)pos/modules/checkout/components/paymentType/supplement.tsx(1 hunks)pos/modules/checkout/hooks/useInvoicePrintStyles.tsx(1 hunks)pos/modules/checkout/hooks/useInvoicePrintSupplement.tsx(1 hunks)pos/store/index.tsx(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- pos/modules/checkout/hooks/useInvoicePrintStyles.tsx
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- pos/modules/checkout/components/paymentType/supplement.tsx
- pos/store/index.tsx
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (3)
pos/modules/checkout/components/paymentType/invoiceInfoForm.tsx (3)
pos/store/index.tsx (5)
userNameAtom(54-54)userBankAddressAtom(55-55)accountTypeAtom(56-56)companyRegisterAtom(57-57)invoiceExpiryDaysAtom(58-58)packages/erxes-ui/src/components/form/styles.tsx (2)
Select(374-374)Input(372-372)packages/ui-sales/src/boards/styles/popup.ts (1)
Button(31-51)
pos/modules/checkout/components/paymentType/invoiceInfo.tsx (4)
pos/store/index.tsx (5)
userNameAtom(54-54)userBankAddressAtom(55-55)companyRegisterAtom(57-57)accountTypeAtom(56-56)invoiceExpiryDaysAtom(58-58)pos/store/cart.store.ts (2)
totalAmountAtom(123-125)cartAtom(113-113)pos/modules/checkout/hooks/useInvoicePrintStyles.tsx (1)
useInvoicePrintStyles(30-269)pos/lib/utils.ts (1)
formatNum(147-162)
pos/modules/checkout/hooks/useInvoicePrintSupplement.tsx (2)
pos/store/index.tsx (3)
userNameAtom(54-54)userBankAddressAtom(55-55)printModalOpenAtom(60-60)pos/modules/checkout/utils/printUtils.ts (2)
replaceTemplateVariables(120-128)createPrintDocument(130-143)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (3)
- GitHub Check: pos-ui
- GitHub Check: runtest
- GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript-typescript)
🔇 Additional comments (12)
pos/modules/checkout/components/paymentType/invoiceInfoForm.tsx (2)
28-34: LGTM! Well-designed validation logic.The form validation correctly handles conditional requirements based on account type and properly validates against empty/whitespace-only values.
36-40: LGTM! Well-implemented modal with proper form handling.The modal implementation follows best practices with proper positioning, backdrop, and form submission handling. The button states are correctly managed based on form validation.
Also applies to: 113-132
pos/modules/checkout/hooks/useInvoicePrintSupplement.tsx (3)
6-18: Good timer management setup for preventing memory leaks.The use of a Set to track timers and the cleanup on unmount is a solid pattern for preventing memory leaks in this complex printing workflow.
29-37: Solid error handling foundation with room for enhancement.The
safeWindowOperationwrapper and return value pattern provide good error handling structure. The popup blocker detection is particularly valuable for user experience.Consider enhancing error specificity for better debugging:
} catch (error) { - console.error('Print failed:', error) + console.error('Print failed:', error instanceof Error ? error.message : error) setPrintOpen(false) printWindow.close() - return { success: false, error: 'Print failed. Please try again.' } + return { success: false, error: `Print failed: ${error instanceof Error ? error.message : 'Unknown error'}. Please try again.` } }Also applies to: 91-124
107-112: Confirm presence of{{userName}}&{{userBankAddress}}in your print templateI couldn’t locate these placeholders in the TS/TSX files via search— they may live in an external HTML/template file or be injected at runtime. Please manually verify that the DOM content referenced by
printRefactually contains{{userName}}and{{userBankAddress}}before callingreplaceTemplateVariables(). For example:
- Inspect the source template file or component that populates
printRef.- Log
printRef.current.innerHTMLjust before replacement to confirm the placeholders are present.pos/modules/checkout/components/paymentType/invoiceInfo.tsx (3)
29-31: LGTM! Proper date calculations with good memoization.The use of
useMemofor date calculations andaddDaysfrom date-fns is correct and efficient. The dependency array properly includes all relevant dependencies.
57-142: Well-structured table with good accessibility and UX.The table implementation has proper HTML structure, consistent styling through the custom hook, and good user experience with empty state handling and clear product information display.
47-51: Consistent number formatting with appropriate localization.The use of
formatNumutility and the Mongolian tugrik (₮) symbol with "MN" bank prefix indicates proper localization for the Mongolian market. The formatting is consistent throughout the component.Also applies to: 127-134
pos/modules/checkout/components/paymentType/selectPaymentType.main.tsx (4)
57-71: Excellent refactoring of the print functionality!This implementation successfully addresses the previous review concerns:
- Complex print logic moved to dedicated hook
- Proper error handling with try-catch
- Clean separation of concerns
- No more deprecated APIs in this component
The simplified
handlePrintfunction is much more maintainable and follows good React patterns.
53-56: Good conditional rendering strategy for performance.The
hasPrintInvoicecheck and conditional rendering of thePrintableSupplementaddresses the previous performance concerns about hidden DOM nodes. The component only renders the print content when actually needed.Also applies to: 134-140
157-176: Clean conditional logic in Term component.The addition of
invoiceandonPrintprops with conditional handling inhandleClickis well-implemented. The logic clearly separates print workflow from regular payment type selection.
21-21: Import path has been corrected.The import path for
UserInfoFormnow correctly points to"./invoiceInfoForm", addressing the previous typo concern.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Important
Looks good to me! 👍
Reviewed b765a39 in 1 minute and 54 seconds. Click for details.
- Reviewed
72lines of code in2files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
3draft comments. View those below. - Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with 👍 or 👎 to teach Ellipsis.
1. pos/modules/checkout/components/paymentType/invoiceInfoForm.tsx:106
- Draft comment:
The onChange handler for expiryDays allows values >= 0, but the validation requires a minimum of 1. Consider changing the check to 'value >= 1' for consistency. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 30% vs. threshold = 50% The comment is technically correct - there is an inconsistency. However, the form handles invalid values gracefully: the submit button is disabled via isFormValid() and there's an error message shown to the user. The onChange handler being more permissive doesn't cause any problems since invalid values are caught elsewhere. The HTML min/max attributes also provide UI constraints. The inconsistency could be confusing to future maintainers. Having consistent validation boundaries across all checks would make the code more maintainable. While consistency would be nice, the current implementation is still robust and safe. The inconsistency doesn't introduce any bugs or user-facing issues. While technically correct, this comment points out a minor inconsistency that doesn't impact functionality. The form handles invalid values appropriately through other validation mechanisms.
2. pos/modules/checkout/components/paymentType/invoiceInfoForm.tsx:116
- Draft comment:
The error message for expiryDays is shown only when expiryDays > 0. This might hide errors when the value is 0; consider removing the 'expiryDays > 0' condition. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 10% vs. threshold = 50% The form validation in isFormValid() already ensures expiryDays is valid before submission. The input element has min="1" max="365". The error message is just UI feedback. Having no error message when value is 0 is actually fine - it's an empty/unset state. Showing an error for 0 could be confusing since it's a natural initial/empty state. The reviewer has a point that technically 0 is invalid and users should be informed. The current UX could be seen as inconsistent. However, 0 is a special case representing an empty/unset state, and it's common UX pattern to not show validation errors for empty required fields until the user has interacted with them. The current behavior is actually a reasonable UX choice. The comment suggests a change that could make the UX worse by showing errors too aggressively.
3. pos/modules/checkout/components/paymentType/selectPaymentType.main.tsx:26
- Draft comment:
Removal of the unused 'isPrinting' variable cleans up the code. Confirm that it isn’t needed elsewhere. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:0%<= threshold50%None
Workflow ID: wflow_G4YhJ0ktuW1iTzg5
You can customize by changing your verbosity settings, reacting with 👍 or 👎, replying to comments, or adding code review rules.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Caution
Changes requested ❌
Reviewed fa8ba92 in 1 minute and 51 seconds. Click for details.
- Reviewed
299lines of code in2files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
4draft comments. View those below. - Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with 👍 or 👎 to teach Ellipsis.
1. pos/modules/checkout/components/paymentType/invoiceInfo.tsx:27
- Draft comment:
Removed columnWidths from the destructured object. Confirm that the inline hard-coded widths in the table header are intentional for consistency. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment looked like it was already resolved.
2. pos/modules/checkout/components/paymentType/invoiceInfo.tsx:128
- Draft comment:
The table header now has 5 columns, omitting the per‐item "НӨАТ-гүй үнэ" column. Confirm that this simplification meets the design requirements. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful =0%<= threshold50%The comment is asking the PR author to confirm that the change meets design requirements, which violates the rule against asking for confirmation of intention or ensuring behavior is intended. It does not provide a specific code suggestion or ask for a specific test to be written.
3. pos/modules/checkout/hooks/useInvoicePrintStyles.tsx:82
- Draft comment:
The dateSection style was modified by removing backgroundColor and padding. Verify that the new minimalist styling is intentional. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful =30%<= threshold50%The comment is asking the PR author to verify if the minimalist styling is intentional. This falls under the rule of not asking the author to confirm their intention. However, it does point out a specific change in styling which could be useful if it was unintentional. The comment could be rephrased to suggest checking the styling change, but as it stands, it violates the rules.
4. pos/modules/checkout/hooks/useInvoicePrintStyles.tsx:148
- Draft comment:
Border style was removed from table.container. Confirm that this removal aligns with the intended print design. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment looked like it was already resolved.
Workflow ID: wflow_1dT2tQLdl2ck27E5
You can customize by changing your verbosity settings, reacting with 👍 or 👎, replying to comments, or adding code review rules.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Important
Looks good to me! 👍
Reviewed 6608dac in 1 minute and 26 seconds. Click for details.
- Reviewed
269lines of code in1files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
5draft comments. View those below. - Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with 👍 or 👎 to teach Ellipsis.
1. pos/modules/checkout/components/paymentType/invoiceInfo.tsx:18
- Draft comment:
Good use of constants to avoid magic numbers. Consider adding a brief comment to explain VAT_RATE and VAT_MULTIPLIER. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:0%<= threshold50%None
2. pos/modules/checkout/components/paymentType/invoiceInfo.tsx:39
- Draft comment:
Replacing the hard-coded 1.1 with VAT_MULTIPLIER is an improvement for maintainability. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:0%<= threshold50%None
3. pos/modules/checkout/components/paymentType/invoiceInfo.tsx:43
- Draft comment:
Rounding the computed subtotal, VAT, and total can introduce minor discrepancies. Confirm that rounding after summing is the desired approach versus rounding per item when accuracy is critical. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 10% vs. threshold = 50% While the comment raises a valid mathematical point about rounding, this appears to be a deliberate design choice. The code is handling a VAT tax calculation which often has specific rules about rounding. The approach taken (rounding each component) is a common and acceptable practice in tax calculations. The comment is speculative ("can introduce") and asks for confirmation rather than pointing out a clear issue. I might be overlooking local tax regulations that require a specific rounding approach. There could be business requirements around tax calculation precision that I'm not aware of. Even if there are specific requirements, the comment doesn't demonstrate knowledge of them - it's just asking for confirmation. If there were specific rounding requirements, they should be stated directly rather than asking the author to verify. Delete the comment. It asks for confirmation rather than pointing out a clear issue, and the current implementation is a reasonable approach to tax calculations.
4. pos/modules/checkout/components/paymentType/invoiceInfo.tsx:183
- Draft comment:
The VAT percentage in the display text is hardcoded as '10%'. Consider computing this value from VAT_RATE (e.g. VAT_RATE * 100) to keep the display in sync with the logic. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:33%<= threshold50%None
5. pos/modules/checkout/components/paymentType/invoiceInfo.tsx:103
- Draft comment:
The table markup and inline styles are quite verbose. Consider refactoring the table rendering into smaller subcomponents or external style definitions to improve maintainability. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:33%<= threshold50%None
Workflow ID: wflow_gZL425DAVscf7l9X
You can customize by changing your verbosity settings, reacting with 👍 or 👎, replying to comments, or adding code review rules.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Caution
Changes requested ❌
Reviewed 94b67ca in 1 minute and 29 seconds. Click for details.
- Reviewed
73lines of code in4files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
4draft comments. View those below. - Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with 👍 or 👎 to teach Ellipsis.
1. packages/plugin-pos-ui/src/pos/components/Pos.tsx:272
- Draft comment:
Removed passing 'catProdMappings' prop. Ensure that ConfigStep now correctly accesses mappings from pos.catProdMappings; if mappings are needed separately, consider consolidating. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:33%<= threshold50%None
2. packages/plugin-pos-ui/src/pos/components/step/ConfigStep.tsx:44
- Draft comment:
Removed the redundant 'catProdMappings' prop from ConfigStep's props. Now the component derives mappings directly from pos.catProdMappings—verify that this meets all use cases. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:33%<= threshold50%None
3. packages/plugin-pos-ui/src/pos/components/step/PaymentsStep.tsx:262
- Draft comment:
Updated the payment description to include the 'printInvoice: true' flag. Ensure that documentation and logic elsewhere align with this new print functionality. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:33%<= threshold50%None
4. packages/plugin-pos-ui/src/pos/components/step/PaymentsStep.tsx:258
- Draft comment:
There's a potential typographical error in the description text: “ебаримт”. Please check if this term is spelled as intended (e.g., should it be “ебаримт” or another variant?) - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful =0%<= threshold50%The comment is asking the PR author to confirm the spelling of a term, which violates the rule against asking for confirmation or verification of intention. It does not provide a specific code suggestion or improvement.
Workflow ID: wflow_2tj9Y06BEKjwJAta
You can customize by changing your verbosity settings, reacting with 👍 or 👎, replying to comments, or adding code review rules.
| const onSelectChange = (field: string, value: any) => { | ||
| setState((prevState) => ({ ...prevState, [field]: value })); | ||
| editMapping({ ...state, _id: item._id }); | ||
| editMapping({ _id: item._id, ...state, [field]: value }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The updated spread order in onSelectChange (using { _id: item._id, ...state, [field]: value }) may risk using a stale state value since setState is async. Consider using a functional update to guarantee the latest state.
|
|
||
| setState((prevState) => ({ ...prevState, [name]: value })); | ||
| editMapping({ ...state, _id: item._id }); | ||
| editMapping({ _id: item._id, ...state, [name]: value }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Similarly, in onChangeInput the editMapping call uses the current 'state' immediately after setState, which might be stale. Refactor to use the updated state value or the setState callback result.
|
ISSUE
Context
Your context here. Additionally, any screenshots. Delete this line.
// Delete the below section once completed
PR Checklist
Summary by Sourcery
Implement printing of a payment supplement by collecting user information in a modal form and generating a styled print document from the checkout payment type component.
New Features:
Enhancements:
Important
Add functionality to print payment supplements by collecting user information and generating a styled document.
UserInfoFormcomponent to collect user details for invoice printing.PrintableSupplementcomponent to render invoice information for printing.InvoiceInfocomponent to display formatted invoice details.useInvoicePrintSupplementhook to manage print operations.usePaymentStateshook to manage payment state transitions.SelectPaymentTypeMainto include a "Нэхэмжлэх" button for printing invoices.userNameAtom,userBankAddressAtom, etc.) to store user information.useInvoicePrintStylesfor consistent document formatting.catProdMappingsprop fromConfigStepandPoscomponents.PaymentsStepto includeprintInvoiceconfiguration option.This description was created by
for 94b67ca. You can customize this summary. It will automatically update as commits are pushed.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Improvements
Bug Fixes