Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

Conversation

@wajid-h
Copy link
Contributor

@wajid-h wajid-h commented May 4, 2025

No description provided.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hello @wajid-h, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

Summary of Changes

This pull request focuses on improving the way file sizes and speeds are formatted within the SaveHere application. The primary change involves refactoring the FormatSize and FormatSpeed methods in Helpers.cs to use an enum-based approach for better readability and maintainability. Additionally, a minor change was made in YtdlpService.cs to reorder an interface method.

Highlights

  • File Size Formatting: The FormatSize method in Helpers.cs has been refactored to use an enum (BufferSizeFormat) for defining size units (B, KB, MB, GB). This makes the code more readable and easier to extend with additional units in the future.
  • Speed Formatting: The FormatSpeed method in Helpers.cs now reuses the FormatSize method and appends "/s" to the result, ensuring consistency in formatting.
  • Interface Method Reordering: The GetExecutablePath method in IYtdlpService interface has been moved above GetSupportedSitesFilePath for better organization.

Changelog

  • SaveHere/SaveHere/Helpers/Helpers.cs
    • Introduced BufferSizeFormat enum to represent file size units.
    • Refactored FormatSize method to use the BufferSizeFormat enum for formatting.
    • Modified FormatSpeed method to reuse FormatSize and append "/s".
  • SaveHere/SaveHere/Services/YtdlpService.cs
    • Reordered GetExecutablePath method in IYtdlpService interface.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.


A byte's a byte, that much is true,
But sizes grow, for me and you.
With KB, MB, GB's might,
Formatting code shines ever so bright,
And readability improves for the coder too.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

The pull request improves the handling of file size formats by introducing an enum for buffer sizes and a more streamlined FormatSize function. This change enhances readability and maintainability. Additionally, a minor change was made in YtdlpService.cs to adjust the spacing of a method declaration.

Summary of Findings

  • Code Duplication: The original code had duplicated logic for formatting file sizes and speeds. The refactoring eliminates this duplication by creating a single FormatSize function and reusing it for FormatSpeed.
  • Readability and Maintainability: The introduction of the BufferSizeFormat enum and the use of a foreach loop in FormatSize improves the readability and maintainability of the code compared to the original nested if-else statements.

Merge Readiness

The code changes are well-structured and improve the codebase. I recommend merging this pull request after addressing the identified issue.

{
public static string FormatSpeed(double speed)
{
enum BufferSizeFormat
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

UX Recommendation: Its better to use a step of 1000 for KB/MB/GB instead of 1024, recommend switching MiB KiB etc for a step of 1024

@gudarzi gudarzi merged commit 78bb8af into gudarzi:v3.0 May 4, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants