Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

Conversation

@andrewnicols
Copy link
Member

This is a replacemnt for #253 and solves #254, #255 and possibly others.

Unfortunately I can't push to 253 so I'll close that issue in favour of this one where I've removed a meaningless commit and rebased.

@coveralls
Copy link
Collaborator

coveralls commented Oct 4, 2023

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 6406966652

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage increased (+0.03%) to 96.97%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 6406614830: 0.03%
Covered Lines: 750
Relevant Lines: 763

💛 - Coveralls

Dave.Merrill added 2 commits October 4, 2023 21:48
no-files-without-scenarios check to fail

* Add FeatureWithRuleAndScenario.feature
* Add FeatureWithRuleAndScenarioOutline.feature
* Add ViolationsWithRule.feature
* Include tests to exercise above features
* Enhance no-files-without-scenarios.filterScenarios
to handle Scenarios and Scenario Outlines within Rules
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Using Rule keyword causes no-files-without-scenarios check to fail

2 participants