Licensing issue (MIT) #509
Description
@klag some of the files you authored include a MIT license header, while the rest of the project is under the LGPL. I think we discussed something at the time, but it's a bit weird that we have two licenses for the same codebase of the same distributable, isn't it? I suggest you just change these headers to our standard LGPL header. Is that ok, or was there a reason for having a different license within the project?
Here's the list of offending files according to grep:
./tools/openapi2jolie/openapi2jolie.ol:The MIT License (MIT)
./tools/jolier/jolier.ol:The MIT License (MIT)
./include/services/jester/JesterUtilsInterface.iol:The MIT License (MIT)
./include/services/jester/JesterConfiguratorInterface.iol:The MIT License (MIT)
./include/services/jester/jester_configurator.ol:The MIT License (MIT)
./include/services/jester/router.iol:The MIT License (MIT)
./include/services/jester/router.ol:The MIT License (MIT)
./include/services/json/jsonschema/JSONSchemaGeneratorInterface.iol:The MIT License (MIT)
./include/services/json/jsonschema/json_schema_generator.ol:The MIT License (MIT)
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Type
Projects
Status