Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

Conversation

@mareknovotny
Copy link
Member

A tryout to see if this revert really fails on CI checks

JIRA:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/SRVLOGIC-686

referenced Pull Requests:

How to replicate CI configuration locally?

Build Chain tool does "simple" maven build(s), the builds are just Maven commands, but because the repositories relates and depends on each other and any change in API or class method could affect several of those repositories there is a need to use build-chain tool to handle cross repository builds and be sure that we always use latest version of the code for each repository.

build-chain tool is a build tool which can be used on command line locally or in Github Actions workflow(s), in case you need to change multiple repositories and send multiple dependent pull requests related with a change you can easily reproduce the same build by executing it on Github hosted environment or locally in your development environment. See local execution details to get more information about it.

How to retest this PR or trigger a specific build:
  • for pull request checks
    Please add comment: Jenkins retest this

  • for a specific pull request check
    Please add comment: Jenkins (re)run [drools|kogito-runtimes|kogito-apps|kogito-examples] tests

  • for a full downstream build

    • for jenkins job: please add comment: Jenkins run fdb
    • for github actions job: add the label run_fdb
  • a compile downstream build please add comment: Jenkins run cdb

  • a full production downstream build please add comment: Jenkins execute product fdb

  • an upstream build please add comment: Jenkins run upstream

  • for quarkus branch checks
    Run checks against Quarkus current used branch
    Please add comment: Jenkins run quarkus-branch

  • for a quarkus branch specific check
    Run checks against Quarkus current used branch
    Please add comment: Jenkins (re)run [drools|kogito-runtimes|kogito-apps|kogito-examples] quarkus-branch

  • for quarkus main checks
    Run checks against Quarkus main branch
    Please add comment: Jenkins run quarkus-main

  • for a specific quarkus main check
    Run checks against Quarkus main branch
    Please add comment: Jenkins (re)run [drools|kogito-runtimes|kogito-apps|kogito-examples] quarkus-main

  • for quarkus lts checks
    Run checks against Quarkus lts branch
    Please add comment: Jenkins run quarkus-lts

  • for a specific quarkus lts check
    Run checks against Quarkus lts branch
    Please add comment: Jenkins (re)run [drools|kogito-runtimes|kogito-apps|kogito-examples] quarkus-lts

  • for native checks
    Run native checks
    Please add comment: Jenkins run native

  • for a specific native check
    Run native checks
    Please add comment: Jenkins (re)run [drools|kogito-runtimes|kogito-apps|kogito-examples] native

  • for native lts checks
    Run native checks against quarkus lts branch
    Please add comment: Jenkins run native-lts

  • for a specific native lts check
    Run native checks against quarkus lts branch
    Please add comment: Jenkins (re)run [drools|kogito-runtimes|kogito-apps|kogito-examples] native-lts

How to backport a pull request to a different branch?

In order to automatically create a backporting pull request please add one or more labels having the following format backport-<branch-name>, where <branch-name> is the name of the branch where the pull request must be backported to (e.g., backport-7.67.x to backport the original PR to the 7.67.x branch).

NOTE: backporting is an action aiming to move a change (usually a commit) from a branch (usually the main one) to another one, which is generally referring to a still maintained release branch. Keeping it simple: it is about to move a specific change or a set of them from one branch to another.

Once the original pull request is successfully merged, the automated action will create one backporting pull request per each label (with the previous format) that has been added.

If something goes wrong, the author will be notified and at this point a manual backporting is needed.

NOTE: this automated backporting is triggered whenever a pull request on main branch is labeled or closed, but both conditions must be satisfied to get the new PR created.

@mareknovotny
Copy link
Member Author

found this new addition of v1.6 apache#6381 which was after creating kie-dmn-xsd-resources module

@saumya1singh
Copy link

In PNC + Locally, on top of this PR, build is green. So I think we are good to merge this @mareknovotny

@tkobayas
Copy link

tkobayas commented Oct 6, 2025

  • Drools / windows-latest / Java-17
2025-10-06T02:47:03.7433376Z [ERROR] Failed to execute goal org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-compiler-plugin:3.13.0:testCompile (default-testCompile) on project drools-decisiontables: Error while storing the mojo status: Input length = 1 -> [Help 1]^M

This was fixed by 0dce20993c9df for 9.103.x-prod-ansible. I think it should be cherry-picked to 9.104.x-prod and main. It can be done by separated PRs.

  • Drools Ansible RuleBook Integration Check
2025-10-05T22:35:37.3828170Z ##[group]Checking out kiegroup/drools-ansible-rulebook-integration and its dependencies (2 projects in total). It can take some time.
2025-10-05T22:35:37.3832647Z [INFO] Checking if kiegroup/drools is forked to mareknovotny/drools
2025-10-05T22:35:37.3922600Z [INFO] Checking if kiegroup/drools-ansible-rulebook-integration is forked to mareknovotny/drools-ansible-rulebook-integration
2025-10-05T22:35:37.4907501Z [INFO] Fork mareknovotny/drools-ansible-rulebook-integration does not exist. Trying to find a fork with a different name in mareknovotny
2025-10-05T22:35:37.7411497Z [INFO] Fork mareknovotny/drools found.
2025-10-05T22:35:37.7464145Z [INFO] Fork for kiegroup/drools-ansible-rulebook-integration not found where owner is mareknovotny
2025-10-05T22:35:38.0535619Z [ERROR] [kiegroup/drools-ansible-rulebook-integration] Error cloning kiegroup/drools-ansible-rulebook-integration and switching to target branch 9.104.x-prod

Does build-chain require drools-ansible-rulebook-integration repo on Marek's side? Anyway, ansible integration is not required for this build, so I think we may ignore it for now.

@mareknovotny
Copy link
Member Author

yes. we didn't created 9.104.x-prod branch on Ansible integration repository, that is expected failure @tkobayas. Thanks for pointing the GHA missing profile. we need to backport it of course.

@mareknovotny mareknovotny changed the title 9.104.x prod xsds [9.104.x-prod] [SRVLOGIC-686] rolling back xsds removal Oct 6, 2025
@mareknovotny mareknovotny merged commit 76b683b into kiegroup:9.104.x-prod Oct 6, 2025
6 of 10 checks passed
@mareknovotny mareknovotny deleted the 9.104.x-prod-xsds branch October 6, 2025 05:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants