Fix Build on PG 18 #595
Merged
Fix Build on PG 18 #595
+2
−2
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Attributes are no longer directly accessible in PG 18.
2 tasks
|
thanks for the PR - normally I wait until commitfest has completed to add support for the next version, as there are accelerated changes during that period that could be backward incompatible, but I will assess these changes in the meantime. and yep, definitely the correct branch! |
|
oh, yes, this is quite innocuous, thanks much for the contribution! |
JerrySievert
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 5, 2025
Attributes are no longer directly accessible in PG 18.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Attributes are no longer directly accessible in PG 18. This PR changes the code so that the appropriate macro is used instead.
I'm not sure which is your current development branch, so I wasn't sure which branch to base the PR on.