Sweave vignette #636
Replies: 2 comments 3 replies
-
|
There is no workaround for this currently, apart from ignoring the failures. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Thanks for the quick response. I will hold off using this tool for this package, but will test it on others |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Lots of R-hub containers do not build the vignettes, anyway. If the vignette builds on your machine, then it does not really make too much sense to test it elsewhere. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I am happy not to test the vignette building. So to refine my question: how do I avoid testing the vignette building process on R-hub, while keeping the Rnw file around and building the vignette locally (and placing it somewhere in the package directory)? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Is there any solution for this issue? So we can't check packages using Rhub when we have a vignette? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
I am doing a minor update to my package, and wanted to check it with the new rhub. Unfortunately, all checks failed
https://github.com/anikoszabo/CorrBin/actions/runs/10618750115 apparently because there is no latex on the servers. I have a .Rnw file in the vignettes folder, and I can build it locally just fine.
I am not sure what is the correct workaround. I can compile the file into PDF, but where do I put it? I also don't want to just keep the static file locally. I also want to avoid converting it to Rmd just to be able to run checks.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions