Re-licensing covr as MIT #454
Description
We are systematically re-licensing tidyverse and r-lib packages to use the MIT license, to make our package licenses as clear and permissive as possible. To do so, we need the approval of all copyright holders, which I have found by reviewing contributions from all all non-RStudio contributors. @brodieG, @chen-liang-oracle, @chinqw, @daattali, @daroczig, @Delfic, @enbrown, @helske, @HenrikBengtsson, @hughjonesd, @jameslamb, @JohnMount, @jonclayden, @jpritikin, @karl-forner-quartz-bio, @katrinleinweber, @kenahoo, @kforner, @kirillseva, @kiwiroy, @maodunzhe, @MichaelChirico, @MishaCivey, @nibant, @patperry, @renkun-ken, @rmflight, @robertzk, @RolandASc, @siddharthab, @stevepeak, @surmann, @wamserma, @wligtenberg, would you permit us to re-license covr with the MIT license? If so, please comment "I agree" below.
- @chen-liang-oracle
- @chinqw
- @daattali
- @Delfic
- @helske
- @hughjonesd
- @jameslamb
- @JohnMount
- @jpritikin
- @katrinleinweber
- @kforner
- @kiwiroy
- @maodunzhe
- @MichaelChirico
- @MishaCivey
- @nibant
- @patperry
- @RolandASc
- @siddharthab
- @surmann
(You may recall that we've been through this process once before in #256. We now understand the licensing landscape much better and are moving to make our policies consistent across the tidyverse)