Following up #131, I think it is better to leave this for the community to decide. The interim solution so far is to keep ods_sheets at least until v3. But what should we do for v3?

list_ods_sheets conforms to the so-called Tidy Design Principles on function names. It's a verb. All other functions (although not many) in this packages are verbs: read_ods and write_ods.

However, readxl::excel_sheets violates the Tidy Design Principles, even though readxl is part of Tidyverse. If readODS emulates readxl, we should keep ods_sheets. An additional argument is reverse dependencies: several packages use ods_sheets.

Looking beyond readxl, DBI uses dbListTables. There are also base functions such as list.files, list.dirs.