Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

dataspice - Create lightweight schema.org descriptions of Data #426

@amoeba

Description

@amoeba

Submitting Author: Bryce Mecum (@amoeba)
Other Authors: Carl Boetigger (@cboettig), Scott Chamberlaim (@sckott), Auriel Fournier (@aurielfournier), Kelly Hondula (@khondula), Anna Krystalli (@annakrystalli), Maëlle Salmon (@maelle), Kate Webbink (@magpiedin), Kara Woo (@karawoo)
Repository: https://github.com/ropenscilabs/dataspice/
Version submitted: 1.0.0
Editor: @emilyriederer
Reviewers: @tdjames1, @aebratt

Due date for @tdjames1: 2021-03-21

Due date for @aebratt: 2021-03-21
Archive: TBD
Version accepted: TBD


  • Paste the full DESCRIPTION file inside a code block below:
Package: dataspice
Version: 1.0.0
Title: Create Lightweight Schema.org Descriptions of Data
Description: The goal of 'dataspice' is to make it easier for researchers to
  create basic, lightweight, and concise metadata files for their datasets.
  These basic files can then be used to make useful information available during
  analysis, create a helpful dataset "README" webpage, and produce more complex
  metadata formats to aid dataset discovery. Metadata fields are based on
  the 'Schema.org' and 'Ecological Metadata Language' standards.
Authors@R: c(
    person("Carl", "Boettiger", role = c("aut"), comment = "https://github.com/cboettig"),
    person("Scott", "Chamberlain", role = c("aut"), comment = "https://github.com/sckott"),
    person("Auriel", "Fournier", role = c("aut"), comment = "https://github.com/aurielfournier"),
    person("Kelly", "Hondula", role = c("aut"), comment = "https://github.com/khondula"),
    person("Anna", "Krystalli", role = c("aut"), comment = "https://github.com/annakrystalli"),
    person("Bryce", "Mecum", role = c("aut", "cre"), email = "[email protected]", comment = "https://github.com/amoeba"),
    person("Maëlle", "Salmon", role = c("aut"), comment = "https://github.com/maelle"),
    person("Kate", "Webbink", role = c("aut"), comment = "https://github.com/magpiedin"),
    person("Kara", "Woo", role = c("aut"), comment = "https://github.com/karawoo"),
    person("Irene", "Steves", role = c("ctb"), comment = "https://github.com/isteves"))
License: MIT + file LICENSE
URL: https://github.com/ropenscilabs/dataspice
BugReports: https://github.com/ropenscilabs/dataspice/issues
Encoding: UTF-8
LazyData: true
ByteCompile: true
RoxygenNote: 7.1.1
Imports:
    purrr,
    EML,
    fs,
    jsonlite,
    whisker,
    readr,
    stringr,
    tools,
    tibble,
    shiny,
    rhandsontable,
    dplyr,
    tidyr,
    ggplot2,
    magrittr
Suggests:
    testthat,
    kableExtra,
    knitr,
    rmarkdown,
    servr,
    listviewer,
    maps
VignetteBuilder: knitr
Roxygen: list(markdown = TRUE)

Scope

  • Please indicate which category or categories from our package fit policies this package falls under: (Please check an appropriate box below. If you are unsure, we suggest you make a pre-submission inquiry.):

    • data retrieval
    • data extraction
    • data munging
    • data deposition
    • workflow automation
    • version control
    • citation management and bibliometrics
    • scientific software wrappers
    • field and lab reproducibility tools
    • database software bindings
    • geospatial data
    • text analysis
  • Explain how and why the package falls under these categories (briefly, 1-2 sentences):

    dataspice helps create metadata for deposit/publication of data

  • Who is the target audience and what are scientific applications of this package?

    The target audience is people producing data of all types, scientists and otherwise. Documenting data has a multitude of scientific applications including data publication, data sharing, data integration, etc.

  • Are there other R packages that accomplish the same thing? If so, how does yours differ or meet our criteria for best-in-category?

    No other packages do the same thing (to my knowledge). dataspice is somewhat related to EML, similar to codebook and EMLAssemblyLine.

  • (If applicable) Does your package comply with our guidance around Ethics, Data Privacy and Human Subjects Research?

    I don't think this is applicable to our package.

  • If you made a pre-submission enquiry, please paste the link to the corresponding issue, forum post, or other discussion, or @tag the editor you contacted.

    @maelle and I have talked about this on ropensci Slack

Technical checks

Confirm each of the following by checking the box.

This package:

Publication options

  • Do you intend for this package to go on CRAN?

  • Do you intend for this package to go on Bioconductor?

  • Do you wish to submit an Applications Article about your package to Methods in Ecology and Evolution? If so:

MEE Options
  • The package is novel and will be of interest to the broad readership of the journal.
  • The manuscript describing the package is no longer than 3000 words.
  • You intend to archive the code for the package in a long-term repository which meets the requirements of the journal (see MEE's Policy on Publishing Code)
  • (Scope: Do consider MEE's Aims and Scope for your manuscript. We make no guarantee that your manuscript will be within MEE scope.)
  • (Although not required, we strongly recommend having a full manuscript prepared when you submit here.)
  • (Please do not submit your package separately to Methods in Ecology and Evolution)

Code of conduct

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions