AArch64 has different syscall number for futex #36
Conversation
| version(X86_64) { | ||
| enum SYS_futex = 202; | ||
| } else version(AArch64) { | ||
| enum SYS_futex = 98; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
We should support x86 and either have a default or a static assert
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Probably should have it, but not here. And not in this PR.
However, I also wonder if there is a different option we should do. Basically so you don't have to do foolish things like only depend on symgc if you are on 64-bit systems.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think actually there will likely be a lot of compiler failures because symgc does a lot of asserts to ensure it can store everything properly.
|
I'm thinking we should add ldc/arm here as a compiler for CI. But I can't add that to master. So I'll probably just merge this and then add in a separate PR. |
|
There should be a C header somewhere in druntime defining the value of the futex syscall, no? |
No description provided.