|
Object.entries(liquidityHoldersAtTimestamp).map(([holderAddress, tokenBalanceMapping]) => { |
|
if (!users[holderAddress]) { |
|
users[holderAddress] = initialUser; |
|
} |
|
users[holderAddress]["indirectHolding"] = |
|
(users[holderAddress]["indirectHolding"] ?? 0) + |
|
Object.entries(tokenBalanceMapping).reduce((acc, [tokenId, tokenBalance]) => { |
|
if (event.type === "mint") { |
|
tokenBalances[origin][token0.id] = (tokenBalances[origin][token0.id] || 0) + Number(amount0); |
|
tokenBalances[origin][token1.id] = (tokenBalances[origin][token1.id] || 0) + Number(amount1); |
|
} else { |
|
tokenBalances[origin][token0.id] = (tokenBalances[origin][token0.id] || 0) - Number(amount0); |
|
tokenBalances[origin][token1.id] = (tokenBalances[origin][token1.id] || 0) - Number(amount1); |
|
} |
IIUC, liquidity events consist of mint and burn logs. Doesn't this miss transfers? If you mint a LP position from acount0, transfer it to account1, then burn it from account1, it wouldn't reflect in the indirect holdings?