Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

Allow to specify constraints on the internal state of an automaton? #338

@turion

Description

@turion

In https://github.com/turion/essence-of-live-coding/ there is a type that is very similar to AutomatonT, but it differs by having the Data constraint on the internal state. This was an arbitrary decision, and any other serialization type with sufficient introspection would be suitable as well, e.g. Generic, or maybe even IsAcidic (see turion/essence-of-live-coding#124). There might also be other constraints that give useful features.

The idea is to generalise StreamT (and thus all other types) to include one more type level argument c:

data CStreamT c m a = forall s. c s =>
  CStreamT
  { state :: s
  , step :: s -> m (Result s a)
  }

Instantiating c at Data would then give the current implementation of essence-of-live-coding, allowing to refactor it and reduce the code base. Instantiating it at IsAcidic gives applications whose state can be persisted using acid-state, and so on.

The downside is that this changes a lot of type signatures. It might be possible to create a type alias and use this:

type StreamT m a = CStream () m a

But it's unclear how ergonomic this is, since still all functions need to be written in the more general style.

For some functions, the type signature is even more restricted. Whenever state is added, we need to make sure the whole state is an instance of the type class. E.g. the type signature of feedback might now be:

feedback ::
  (Functor m, c s, (forall s' . c s' => c (ResultState s s'))) =>
  -- | The additional internal state
  s ->
  -- | The original automaton
  Automaton m (a, s) (b, s) ->
  Automaton m a b

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions