Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to github.com

Skip to content

Conversation

@Drodt
Copy link
Contributor

@Drodt Drodt commented Sep 26, 2025

Adds group_ComplexNesting to citeproc-pass. Closes #392.

@reknih
Copy link
Member

reknih commented Sep 26, 2025

Is there a spec reference for the fact that the year suffix should not count documented? Does it never count or would it count if the style explicitly uses the variable (vs. inserted by disambiguation)?

@Drodt
Copy link
Contributor Author

Drodt commented Sep 26, 2025

This behavior mirrors citeproc. I found nothing specific in the spec but it kind of makes sense to me. Some style like APA use exactly the pattern of the test in date_YearSuffixImplicitWithNoDate, which I hoped to fix (but there is more wrong with that one).

E.g.:

<text term="no date" form="short"/>
<text variable="year-suffix" prefix="-"/>

This is printed if "issued" and "status" don't exist. Without this PR, the "no date" would never render.

@reknih reknih merged commit 473085d into typst:main Sep 26, 2025
2 checks passed
@reknih
Copy link
Member

reknih commented Sep 26, 2025

In that case, thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Choose not rendered due to possibly incorrent UsageInfo

3 participants