Replies: 1 comment
-
|
STILT could be utilized for this application. However, whether the STILT simulations could accurately replicate such a situation would be dependent on whether this situation could be captured by the host 3-D model. My guess is something like WRF would be needed to capture high-resolution mountain/hill circulations. You could then run STILT off of WRF output files. See: Lin, J. C., D. V. Mallia, D. Wu, and B. Stephens: How can mountaintop CO2 observations be used |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Dear Sir, I am trying to visualize the effect of local transport to the receptor site.
The observation station at our receptor site is located at very high altitude (hilly area) such a way that boundary layer lies very close to surface or sometimes lies below the observation station.
My doubt is in such a case, can I use STILT to understand the influence of local transport to the receptor site, if yes what parameters i need to be taken care of i run_stilt.r file.
What value of PBL i should use?? Will STILT be able to provide some significant results?
OR i should run WRF and then use the output for STILT??
Thank you in advance.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions