Abstract
Hypoxia, or a state of low tissue oxygenation, has been characterized as an important feature of solid tumors that is related to aggressive phenotypes. The cellular response to hypoxia is controlled by Hypoxia-inducible factors (HIFs), a family of transcription factors. HIFs promote the transcription of gene products that play a role in tumor progression including proliferation, angiogenesis, metastasis, and drug resistance. HIF-1 and HIF-2 are well known and widely described. Although these proteins share a high degree of homology, HIF-1 and HIF-2 have non-redundant roles in cancer. In this review, we summarize the similarities and differences between HIF-1α and HIF-2α in their structure, expression, and DNA binding. We also discuss the canonical and non-canonical regulation of HIF-1α and HIF-2α under hypoxic and normal conditions. Finally, we outline recent strategies aimed at targeting HIF-1α and/or HIF-2α.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Hypoxia refers to a lower-than-normal level of oxygen in an organ and is a common feature of solid tumors. Normal oxygen levels in healthy tissues range widely between organs from approximately 14.5% O2 in the lung alveolus to 3% O2 in lymphoid tissues but average around 5% O2 [1,2,3]. As the rapid proliferation of cancer cells outgrows the development of new blood vessels in a tumor, the O2 levels in cancerous tissue lesions become significantly lower than in healthy tissue, falling between 0.3% and 4.2% O2 [3]. As early as the 1930s, researchers discovered that hypoxic conditions could protect cancer cells from radiation-induced cell death [4]. Later studies suggested that this radiation-resistant phenotype results from reduced DNA damage and cell cycle arrest, and increases in stemness-related gene products [5, 6]. Hypoxic cancer cells are also resistant to chemotherapeutic agents due to increased drug efflux pumps, DNA over-replication, and the upregulated expression of glucose- and oxygen-regulated proteins [7,8,9,10]. More recently, additional studies have confirmed that hypoxia can impair anti-cancer immune responses by regulating the tumor microenvironment (TME) [11,12,13].
Hypoxia-inducible factors (HIFs) are key transcription factors mediating the activation of many oxygen-dependent genes. HIF activation occurs in many pathological disease states, including ischemia, anemia, pulmonary hypertension, kidney disease, and cancer [14,15,16,17,18]. In 1992, Wang GL and Semenza GL first identified HIF-1 as a DNA-binding protein that regulates erythropoietin (EPO) gene transcription in response to hypoxia [19]. Later studies showed that HIF-1 is a heterodimer composed of a hypoxia-inducible alpha subunit and a constitutively expressed beta subunit HIF-1β (also known as the aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator, ARNT) [20]. To date, three isoforms have been described, HIF-1α, -2α, and -3α subunits that all bind to HIF-1β [21,22,23]. Among these isoforms, HIF-1α and HIF-2α are the most well-characterized. During canonical HIF signaling, hypoxia prevents the degradation of HIF-1α or HIF-2 α, which causes their accumulation. Subsequently, HIF-1α or HIF-2α form heterodimers with HIF-1β and bind to DNA motif(s) within target gene promoters known as hypoxia-response elements (HREs) [24]. Data from knockout studies in mice suggested non-redundant roles of HIF-2α during embryonic development. HIF-1α−/− mice showed cardiac and vascular malformations resulting in embryonic lethality at E10.5 [25]. Interestingly, HIF-2α−/− mice also exhibit embryonic lethality, with severe vascular defects and abnormal lung maturation [26,27,28].
In this review, we describe an overview of the structure, expression, and DNA binding of the HIF-1 and HIF-2 complexes. We use the terminology ‘canonical’ to describe hypoxia-induced HIF regulation and non-canonical for hypoxia-independent HIF regulation. We further discuss the most recent therapeutic approaches targeting HIF-1 and HIF-2, to provide new insights into cancer treatment.
Structure, expression patterns, and DNA binding of HIF subunits
Both HIF-1 and HIF-2 are heterodimeric proteins composed of an O2-sensitive alpha subunit and a constitutively expressed beta subunit. Full-length HIF-1α or HIF-2α consists of 826 or 870 amino acids, respectively. Both HIF-1α and HIF-2α contain a basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) domain that is essential for binding to the HRE in the DNA sequence of target gene promoters. They both also contain Per-ARNT-Sim (PAS) domains in the N-terminus, allowing them to heterodimerize with HIF-1β [24, 29]. The C-terminus of HIF-1α and HIF-2α include two transactivation domains (TADs), an N-terminal transactivation domain (N-TAD) and a C-terminal transactivation domain (C-TAD). TADs regulate the interaction of HIFs with co-activators [30]. Moreover, all HIF-1/2α subunits contain an O2-dependent degradation domain (ODDD) that overlaps with the N-TAD, structurally distinguishing HIF-1/2α subunits from HIF-1β. The ODDD serves as the recognition site of the von Hippel-Lidau tumor suppressor protein (pVHL) and mediates oxygen-regulated HIF-1/2α subunit stability. Proteasomal degradation of HIF-1/2α will rapidly proceed when two proline residues in the ODDD are hydroxylated by oxygen-sensitive prolyl hydroxylase domain (PHD)-containing proteins [31]. Unlike the short half-life of HIF-1/2α, the protein level of the HIF-1β subunit remains constant due to the lack of ODDD and N-TAD (Fig. 1).
Structure of HIF isoforms and functional domains. HIF-1α shares a high level of similarity with HIF-2α, contain bHLH motif for DNA binding, two PAS domains (PAS-A and PAS-B) for heterodimerization, TADs (N-TAD and C-TAD) for co-activator binding and transactivation, and ODDD for proteasomal degradation. HIF-3α only has bHLH, two PAS domains, ODDD, and N-TAD. HIF-1β does not contain ODDD or N-TAD
Although HIF-1α and HIF-2α both contain bHLH, PAS, ODDD, and TAD domains, the domains differ in their sequence homology [32]. For example, the DNA binding, dimerization, and C-TADs have 83%, 70%, and 67% similarity respectively [33]. The main structural difference between HIF-1α and HIF-2α lies in the ODDD. The distinct regions within this domain lead to differences in their regulation and stability. HIF-1α degradation is dependent on the hydroxylation of proline residue Pro402 and Pro564, while HIF-2α is hydroxylated on Pro405 and Pro531 in the ODDD. p300/CBP (E1A binding protein p300/CREB-binding protein) is one of the essential co-activators that bind to the C-TAD of both HIF-1α and HIF-2α enhancing HIF-1 and HIF-2 transcriptional activities [34]. In addition to p300/CBP, some specific co-activators that only bind to HIF-1α or HIF-2α have also been found. Signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) interacts with the N-TAD of HIF-1α and increases the recruitment of p300/CBP and RNA polymerase II (Pol II), thereby increasing HIF-1, but not HIF-2-mediated hypoxic transcriptional responses [35]. Likewise, upstream stimulatory factor 2 (USF2) activates HIF-2 target genes by binding to HIF-2α N-TAD recruiting p300/CBP to form enhanceosome complexes at HIF-2 target gene promoters [36]. In addition, HIF-2α contains two bipartite-type nuclear localization signals (NLS), the N-terminus NLS (amino acids 14–50) and the C-terminus NLS (amino acids 705–742) [37]. Under hypoxia, the NLS mediates nuclear accumulation of HIF-2α, which improves HIF-2α binding to the promoters of target genes. HIF-1 is often associated with the acute response to hypoxia, promoting cellular adaptation to low oxygen conditions by enhancing glycolysis, reducing oxygen consumption, and inducing angiogenesis [38,39,40,41]. HIF-2 has been implicated in more chronic responses to hypoxia and regulates erythropoiesis (production of red blood cells) and vascularization [42, 43].
There are also differences in the tissue distribution of each subunit. HIF-1α is widely expressed in human organs including brain, heart, lung, liver, kidney, and pancreas [44]. HIF-2α has tissue-specific expression and is restricted primarily to embryonic cells, endothelium, lungs, kidney, and liver [45]. The overexpression of HIF-1α has been observed in a variety of cancer types and the prognostic relevance of HIF-1α in cancer progression has been demonstrated [46,47,48]. For example, a retrospective study of 745 patients suggested that HIF-1α is expressed in breast carcinomas with higher expression in patients with poor survival rates [49]. The expression of HIF-1α is significantly higher in lung cancer compared to normal lung tissue according to a systematic review and meta-analysis [50].
Results from a ChIP-seq-based high-resolution genome-wide mapping suggest that compared to HIF-2, HIF-1 preferentially binds to the transcriptional start site (TSS) of genes [51]. Approximately 40% of HIF-1-binding sites are located within 2.5 kb of the TSS, while only 20% of HIF-2-binding sites lie within the same range. HIF-1 predominantly binds to genes regulating carbohydrate metabolism, while HIF-2 binds to genes that play an essential role in stem cell pluripotency by mediating the Octamer transcription factor 4 (Oct4) pathway. Additional studies show that different cancer cell lines exhibit diverse binding patterns for HIF-1 and HIF-2. For example, in A549 (lung cancer) cells a higher proportion of DNA was bound by HIF-2-bound rather than HIF-1 whereas the opposite is true in HCT116 (colorectal cancer) cells [52]. Additionally, HIF-1 and HIF-2 have distinct chromatin binding preferences based on specific histone modifications. For example, HIF-1 associates more strongly with histone H3K4me3 and H3K9ac modifications (marks primarily associated with promoters and TSSs); HIF-2 is more strongly related with H3K27me1 and H3K27ac (marks primarily associated with enhancers and other distal regulatory elements) [53]. On the other hand, the methylation status of HREs can alter the ability of HIF-1/HIF-2 to promote the transcriptional regulation of hypoxia-inducible genes under hypoxic conditions [54, 55].
In summary, HIF-1α shares a high level of similarity with HIF-2α. These common features make both HIF-1α and HIF-2α biomarkers of poor prognosis in cancer patients [56]. However, their differences in structure and expression patterns may explain their unique response to hypoxia and thus differences in their functional roles [38,39,40,41,42,43].
Regulation of HIF-1 and HIF-2
The regulation of HIF-1/2α predominantly depends on protein stability and accumulation through post-translational modifications. The canonical oxygen-dependent regulation involving pVHL pathway has been well established; however, non-canonical pathways that regulate HIFs are complex and continue to require further investigation.
Canonical regulation
Under physiological O2 concentrations, HIF-1α and HIF-2α are maintained at low levels due to constant ubiquitination-dependent degradation via interactions with pVHL [57,58,59]. pVHL functions as the recognition component of an E3 ubiquitin-ligase complex and recognizes and binds hydroxylated HIF-1/2α at proline residues (Pro402 and Pro564 in HIF-1α and Pro405 and Pro531 in HIF-2α) [60]. HIF-1/2α proline hydroxylation is catalyzed by PHDs (PHD1, 2, and 3) whose total enzymatic activity requires the presence of O2, ferrous iron (Fe (II)), and ascorbate as cofactors [61]. PHD2 preferentially hydroxylates HIF-1α. The regulation of HIF-2α by PHDs might involve a more complex interplay than HIF-1α. Some studies suggest that PHD2 is the primary regulator of HIF-2α stability, while others also propose a role for PHD1 [62,63,64]. Under hypoxic conditions, PHD activity is suppressed, which decreases HIF-1/2α proline hydroxylation and degradation, resulting in HIF-1/2α protein accumulation. The stabilized HIF-1/2α subunit translocates into the nucleus, dimerizes with HIF-1β, and binds to HREs, leading to the transactivation of hypoxia-responsive genes (Fig. 2) [65].
Adapted from The transcriptional factors HIF-1 and HIF-2 and their novel inhibitors in cancer therapy, by Albadari N, et al., 2019, Expert opinion on drug discovery, 14(7):667–682
Canonical regulation of HIF-1/2α activity under normal and hypoxic conditions. Under normal O2 concentrations, HIF-1/2α is hydroxylated by PHDs and FIH, which allows the formation of HIF-pVHL complexes, resulting in proteasomal degradation. Under hypoxia, the lack of oxygen limits PHD and FIH activities, leading to the accumulation of HIF-1/2α. After translocating to the nucleus, HIF-1/2α forms a heterodimer with HIF-1β. The heterodimer then binds to HRE and recruits co-activators such as p300/CBP to the promoter region of target genes to regulate transcription.
In addition to prolyl hydroxylases, HIF-1/2α oxygen-dependent stability is mediated by factor inhibiting HIF (FIH) which belongs to the Fe (II) and 2-OG-dependent dioxygenase family of hydroxylases [66]. This asparagine hydroxylase modifies Asn803 or Asn847 residues within the C-TADs of HIF-1α and HIF-2α, respectively. This prevents HIFs from associating with transcriptional co-activators such as p300/CBP (Fig. 2) [67, 68]. FIH is activated only in the presence of molecular oxygen. The limited oxygen availability during hypoxia leads to the suppression of FIH, decreases in HIF-1/2α asparagine hydroxylation, and thus stabilization of the transcriptional complex. FIH preferentially hydroxylates HIF-1α potentially due to the valine surrounding the asparagine hydroxylation site in contrast to the alanine present in HIF-2α [69]. In addition, FIH binds to pVHL and inhibits HIF-1α transactivation function by recruiting histone deacetylases [70]. This dual regulation by PHDs and FIH-1 adds another layer of complexity to fine-tuning HIF-mediated responses to changes in O2 levels.
Non-canonical regulation
Apart from the regulation by PHDs and FIH-1, multiple non-canonical mechanisms contribute to the regulation of HIF-1/2α protein stability, synthesis, and transcriptional activity (Fig. 3).
Non-canonical regulation of HIF-1 and HIF-2. HIFs are regulated by multiple interacting proteins and mechanisms independent of O2 regulation. For example, growth factors promote receptor tyrosine kinase activity and drives downstream pathways such as PI3K/AKT/mTOR and RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK which affect the levels of HIF-1α and/or HIF-2α protein
Post-translational modifications of HIF-1/2α alter protein stability and transactivation
Increasing evidence indicates that the alpha subunits of HIF-1 and HIF-2 undergo posttranslational modifications including acetylation, SUMOylation, and phosphorylation. Arrest defective-1 (ARD1) N-acetyltransferase acetylates Lys532 of the HIF-1α ODDD which stabilizes its interaction with pVHL and inhibits HIF-1α transcriptional activity under both normal and hypoxic conditions [71, 72]. By contrast, the metastasis-associated protein 1 (MAT1) induces the deacetylation of HIF-1α at Lys532 residue, which counteracts the acetylation function of ARD1 [73]. The MAT1-induced deacetylation of HIF-1α is mediated by increasing the recruitment of histone deacetylase 1 (HDAC1), thereby promoting HIF-1α stabilization and transcription [74]. Additionally, Lys647 was shown to be deacetylated by an NAD-dependent deacetylase sirtuin 1 (SIRT1), blocking p300 recruitment and resulting in repressed HIF-1α transcriptional activity in HT1080 and HEK 293 cells [75]. However, another study demonstrated that SIRT1 selectively deacetylates HIF-2α and promotes its signaling during hypoxia in Hep3B cells [76]. More recently, using an overexpression system incorporating a Gal4-luciferase reporter, SIRT1 was found to inactivate HIF-1α CAD but to activate HIF-2α CAD in HEK293T cells. In follow-on studies using 10 different cell lines, SIRT1 repressed HIF-1α transcriptional activity but SIRT1 only affected HIF-2α activity in 3 of the 10 cell lines tested. [77]. Geng H, et al. reported that p300 acetylates HIF-1α at Lys709, stabilizing HIF-1α protein levels by decreasing polyubiquitination under both normal and hypoxic conditions [78]. The peptidyl-prolyl cis–trans isomerase NIMA-interacting 1 (Pin1) was found to prolong the stability of HIF-2α by modulating the levels of ubiquitinated HIF-2α, with no significant effect on HIF-1α [79]. However, another study in human colon cancer (HCT116) cells showed that Pin1 interacts with HIF-1α, stabilizing HIF-1α protein and subsequently increasing its transcriptional activity [80].
There is conflicting evidence on the role of SUMOylation in HIF-1α regulation; some reports suggest that SUMOylation can positively regulate HIF-1α stability, while others find that SUMOylation leads to HIF-1α degradation [81,82,83,84]. Studies mutating lysine residues in the ODDD led to the identification of SUMOylated lysine residues (391 and 477) in HIF-1α, enhancing its stability and transcriptional activity [81]. On the other hand, Cheng J, et al. report that hypoxia-induced SUMOylation promotes HIF-1α binding to pVHL in the absence of proline hydroxylation, resulting in ubiquitination and degradation [82]. HIF-2α is SUMOylated at Lys394 located in the SUMOylation consensus site LKEE, leading to its rapid degradation via SUMO-targeted ubiquitin ligases [85, 86].
Reactive oxygen species alter HIF-regulation
The role of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in HIF-1/2α regulation has been demonstrated in many studies. Induced by prolonged hypoxia, accumulation of ROS increases the expression of redox factor-1 (Ref-1), which promotes HIF-1α transcription [87]. However, the activation of HIF-1α induces PHD2 and FIH-1, causing a negative feedback loop that promotes HIF-1α degradation. As discussed in the Sect. “Canonical regulation”, Fe (II) is required for the hydroxylation of HIF-1α by PHD. Ascorbate, a redox active molecule, interacts with ferric iron Fe (III) and reduces it to Fe (II), causing the increased activity of PHDs and suppressed hypoxia-induced HIF-1α activity [88]. In an in vivo study, supplementing ascorbate reduces tumor growth, metastasis, and inflammatory cytokine secretion in ascorbate-deficient Gulo−/− mice [89]. Additionally, nitric oxide (NO) is also able to regulate HIF-1α stabilization and transcriptional activity by S-nitrosylation (SNO) of Cys533 located in ODDD of HIF-1α [90,91,92].
HIF-regulation by tumor suppressor genes: VHL, p53, and PTEN
Perhaps the most well-studied oxygen-independent regulation of HIFs occurs due to a mutation in the tumor suppressor gene, VHL, which can be either somatic or germline [93]. Mutations in the VHL gene result in a non-functional or absent VHL protein. Without functional VHL protein, hydroxylated HIF-1/2α cannot be targeted for degradation resulting in HIF accumulation in the cytoplasm [94]. Individuals with a hereditary VHL mutation have an increased risk of developing tumors, particularly in the central nervous system (CNS) and kidneys [95,96,97].
The tumor suppressor, p53, has also been reported to regulate HIF signaling [98]. p53 impairs HIF-1α protein stability through both mouse double minute 2 homolog (MDM2)-dependent and MDM2-independent pathways [99, 100]. In HCT116 colon carcinoma cells, p53 acts as a scaffold protein complexing the E3 ligase, MDM2 with HIF-1α, thereby leading to the HIF-1α ubiquitination and degradation [101]. Mutating the transactivation domain of p53 abolishes its ability to interact with MDM2, and reduces HIF-1α degradation, thus increasing the levels of HIF-1α [102]. However, Choy M, et al. demonstrated that ectopic expression of p53 promotes HIF-1α ubiquitylation and proteasomal degradation in p53/MDM2 double-null mouse embryonic fibroblasts, indicating other potential p53-mediated mechanisms that promote HIF-1α degradation [103]. A p53 target gene, Parkin (also known as PARK2), interacts with HIF-1α at Lys477 and ubiquitinates HIF-1α, consequently promoting HIF-1α proteasomal degradation [100]. Moreover, mutant-p53 inhibits the expression of SHARP1, a bHLH transcription factor that serves as a HIF-presenting factor to the proteasome and mediates proteasomal degradation of HIF-1α and HIF-2α [104,105,106]. In addition, p53 regulates the transcriptional activity of HIF-1α by competing for binding to the co-activator p300 [107, 108]. Transglutaminase-mediated p53 depletion increases HIF-1α-p300 binding and stabilizes HIF-1α transcriptional activity in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) [109]. Whole genome sequencing was performed on ten patients with clear cell RCC (ccRCC) on long-term treatment with the HIF-2α inhibitor, PT2358 [110]. One patient developed a HIF-2α mutation that prevents PT2358 from blocking the dimerization of HIF-2α with HIF-1β. A second patient acquired a p53 mutation, suggesting that p53 mutations could promote resistance to HIF-2α inhibitors.
Another tumor suppressor protein, phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) is also involved in HIF-1α regulation. Loss of PTEN in glioblastoma-derived cell lines facilitates hypoxia-mediated HIF-1α stabilization, thereby contributing to tumor progression [111]. Treating ovarian cancer cells with gallic acid (GA) which induces PTEN expression by suppressing protein kinase B (AKT) phosphorylation, results in HIF-1α stabilization [112]. PTEN has also been shown to regulate HIF-1α transcription by inhibiting the PI3K/AKT/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway [113]. Myeloid cell-specific PTEN knockout in mice induces HIF-1α and HIF-2α stabilization in bone marrow-derived macrophages [114].
Epigenetic regulation of HIF-1/2α
DNA methylation is an epigenetic change that can alter HIF-1/2α protein stability and/or transcriptional activity. For example, Li C, et al. determined that methylation of both CpG and non-CpG sites in the HIF-1α promoter contributes to HIF-1α expression [115]. HIF-1α promoter methylation is higher in the luminal subtype as compared to triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) samples. This may explain why TNBC cells express higher levels of HIF-1 compared to luminal cell lines and tissue samples. On the other hand, methylated CpG binding protein 3 (MBD3) binds to the HIF-2α promoter and promotes its transcription by demethylating CpG islands located around the TSS in breast cancer cells (MDA-MB-468) [116]. Hypermethylation of the VHL promoter leads to VHL silencing, resulting in HIF-1α constitutive expression and activation, which enhances the transcription of downstream target genes including carbonic anhydrase 9 (CA9) and glucose transporter type 1 (GLUT1) [117, 118].
Another epigenetic mechanism that regulates HIF-1α activity is histone methylation/demethylation. The histone lysine methyltransferases, G9a and G9a-like protein (GLP), directly bind to HIF-1α and methylate HIF-1α at Lys674 but do not bind to HIF-2α. This modification reduces HIF-1α transcriptional activity without altering HIF-1α protein degradation or binding to hypoxia response elements [119]. On the other hand, lysine-specific demethylase 1 (LSD1), also known as KDM1A, demethylates HIF-1α at Lys391, inhibiting its proteasomal degradation. This accumulation of HIF-1α causes an increase in miR-146a expression, which promotes the metastasis of papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) in mouse models [120].
PI3K and MAPK regulation of HIFs
Activation of the PI3K and the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathways promotes an increase in HIF-1α protein translation [121, 122]. PI3K activation induces downstream AKT and mTOR leading to the phosphorylation of the eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E (eIF-4E) binding protein (4E-BP1), a protein translation repressor. Phosphorylated 4E-BP1 lacks the ability to form a complex with eIF-4E [123] and increases HIF-1α protein translation [124] potentially by increasing cap-dependent mRNA initiation. Another study shows that calcitriol reduces HIF-1/2α protein levels by inhibiting AKT and eIF-4E, which indicates a potential mechanism of action that eIF-4E regulates both HIF-1α and HIF-2α protein translation [125]. Moreover, activation of mTOR promotes phosphorylation of p70 ribosomal protein S6 kinase (p70S6K), which subsequently phosphorylates the ribosomal protein S6 (rpS6) and enhances HIF-1α translation [126]. mTOR forms two distinct protein complexes, mTOR complex 1 (mTORC1) and mTOR complex 2 (mTORC2), which regulate different cellular processes. In VHL-deficient RCC cell lines, HIF-1α regulation is dependent on both mTORC1 and mTORC2, while HIF-2α is dependent only on mTORC2 [127]. Likewise, insulin-like growth factor (IGF) has been reported to drive HIF-2α expression in hypoxic neuroblastoma cells via insulin-like growth factor receptor (IGFR)-PI3K-mTORC2 signaling [128]. Similar to the PI3K pathway, the induction of the RAS-RAF-MEK-ERK kinase cascade leads to 4E-BP1 and p70S6K phosphorylation thus enhancing HIF-1α translation [129, 130]. In addition to IGF, a variety of growth factors including vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), heregulin, and androgens, regulate HIF-1/2α protein translation through PI3K and MAPK signaling pathways [131,132,133].
The MAPK/ERK pathway can also lead to increasing transcriptional activity of HIF-1α by either phosphorylating the co-activator p300/CBP or directly phosphorylating the C-terminal domain of HIF-1α at serine 641 and serine 643 [130, 134]. Similarly, HIF-2α is phosphorylated by ERK1/2 at serine 672 which enables its chromosomal region maintenance 1 (CRM1)-mediated nuclear shuttling, increasing HIF-2α transcriptional activity [135]. Reptin52 binds to the HIF-2α protein in the absence of ERK phosphorylation. Therefore, the inhibition of ERK1/2 phosphorylation promotes HIF-2-Reptin52 binding reducing HIF-2α protein stability thus reducing HIF-2α activity [136]. Interestingly, Reptin is methylated by the methyltransferase G9a under hypoxia, which results in Reptin binding to the promoters of a subset of hypoxia-responsive genes, and consequently suppressing HIF-1α transcriptional activity [137].
Apart from PI3K and MAPK, cAMP-dependent protein kinase A (PKA) phosphorylates Thr63 and Ser692 on HIF-1α, thus inhibiting proteasomal degradation of HIF-1α which enhances its transcriptional activity [138]. Casein kinase 1 (CK1) belongs to the casein kinase family of serine/threonine-selective enzymes [139]. CK1δ has been reported to phosphorylate serine 247 in the N-terminal PAS domain of HIF-1α which inhibits HIF-1α activity without affecting its stability or nuclear accumulation [140, 141]. On the contrary, CK1δ promotes HIF-2α nuclear accumulation by phosphorylating HIF-2α at Ser383 and Thr528 which blocks the CRM1-dependent export of HIF-2α from the nucleus [142]. HIF-2α is phosphorylated at Thr844 by casein kinase 2 (CK2), and as a result, its transcriptional activity is increased in an O2-independent manner [143].
Hsp90 and RACK-dependent regulation of HIFs
HIF-1α degradation is regulated through a pVHL-independent pathway involving heat shock protein 90 (Hsp90) and the receptor for activated protein C kinase 1 (RACK1). Initial findings demonstrated that HIF-1α associates in vitro with the molecular chaperone, Hsp90 [144]. Further studies demonstrate that Hsp90-HIF-1α binding leads to enhanced coupling with HIF-1β to promote HIF-1 transactivation [145]. RACK1 competes with Hsp90 for binding to the HIF-1α PAS domain, which promotes ubiquitination and degradation of HIF-1α [146, 147]. Therefore, the Hsp90 inhibitor 17-(allylamino)-17-demethoxygeldanamycin (17AAG) reduces the levels of HIF-1α in an oxygen-independent manner [148]. Co-immunoprecipitation studies showed that HIF-2α also interacts with Hsp90 [149]. Hsp90-deficient embryonic stem cells (ESCs) showed a delayed accumulation of HIF-1α in response to hypoxia exposure as compared to wild-type ES cells. However, heat shock protein 70 (Hsp70) was identified as a HIF-1α-interacting protein that selectively mediates HIF-1α degradation by recruiting the ubiquitin ligase carboxyl terminus of Hsp70-interacting protein (CHIP), with no effect on HIF-2α stability [150, 151].
Inflammatory cytokine regulation of HIFs
Experimental data support the concept that inflammatory cytokines directly regulate the HIF pathway. Hellwig-Burgel T, et al. first described the involvement of proinflammatory cytokines interleukin-1β (IL-1β) and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) in oxygen-independent HIF-1 regulation [152]. They demonstrated that both IL-1β and TNF-α elevate HIF-1 activity by inducing HIF-1 DNA binding. Moreover, IL-1β increases HIF-1α protein levels in human hepatoma cells [152]. Both the PI3K and MAPK pathways are required for IL-1β’s regulation of HIF-1. For example, LY294002, a PI3K inhibitor, inhibits IL-1β-induced HIF-1α activation in a dose-dependent manner [153]. Likewise, Qian D, et al. reported that IL-1β prompts ERK phosphorylation, leading to increased HIF-1α protein expression, which can be inhibited by treating with the ERK inhibitor, PD98059 [154]. IL-1β induces HIF-1α accumulation in a highly invasive human breast cancer cell line, MDA-MB-231, as well as in mouse models [155]. A study in renal cancer suggested that IL-1β could facilitate RCC metastasis through AKT/p65/HIF-2α activation [156]. Haddad J, et al. determined that TNF-α increases ROS production in alveolar epithelial cells thereby promoting HIF-1α translocation into the nucleus, and finally activating downstream target genes [157]. More recent studies show that TNF-α upregulates HIF-1α mRNA and protein levels via the NF-κB pathway [158, 159].
It’s important to note that these non-canonical regulatory mechanisms are often interconnected with the canonical regulation pathways and can contribute to the overall regulation of HIFs in a context-dependent manner. Additionally, the specific details of these pathways may vary depending on the cell type and environmental conditions.
Targeting HIF-1 and HIF-2
Considering the pleiotropic effects of HIF-1/2α in tumor progression, metastasis, and therapeutic resistance, there has been tremendous interest in developing inhibitors targeting this pathway as potential anti-cancer agents. According to their mechanism of action, HIF-1/2α inhibitors can be divided into six major groups that modulate: i) HIF-1/2α transcriptional activity, ii) HIF-1/2α mRNA expression, iii) HIF-1/2α protein translation, iv) HIF-1/2α DNA binding, v) HIF-1/2α stabilization, vi) HIF-2α/HIF-1β binding. Here, we describe small molecule HIF inhibitors that have been recently reported or that have been under clinical investigation over the last 5 years (Table 1). For HIF inhibitors that have been reported on prior to 2018 please see DiGiacomo JW, et al. [160].
HIF-1/2 inhibitors
Inhibitors of HIF transcriptional activity
Blocking HIF-1α binding to co-activator proteins, including p300 and CBP, represents a potential mechanism in which small molecules can impair HIF-1α activity. Chetomin, a natural product isolated from Chaetomium species, was found to inhibit the interaction of HIF-1α and HIF-2α with p300 by binding to the cysteine–histidine-rich domain 1 (CH1) domain of p300 and disrupting its structure [161]. A recent study demonstrated that Chetomin blocks Hsp90 binding to HIF-1α, thus markedly suppressing tumor formation in a spontaneous KrasLA1 lung cancer model, H1299 cell-derived flank xenograft model, and an in vivo tumor-initiating assay [162]. Cardenolides, isolated from a medicinal plant C. gigantea, show strong HIF-1α inhibitory activity and a potent cytotoxic effect in a human breast cancer cell line (MCF-7 cells) [163]. Six new non-classical cardenolides have been developed and most effectively suppress HIF-1α transcriptional activity [164]. Recently, Xue Z, et al. developed a series of benzo[d]isoxazole derivatives that exhibit strong inhibitory activities against HIF-1α transcription, among which, six compounds showed IC50 values below 100 nM in HEK 293 T cells [165]. The effects of cardenolides and benzo[d]isoxazole derivatives on HIF-2α have not been tested to date.
Inhibitors of HIF mRNA expression
A synthetic anti-sense oligonucleotide EZN-2968 that specifically binds and inhibits the expression of HIF-1α mRNA inhibits cancer cell growth under normal and hypoxic conditions in vitro. EZN-2968 also partially suppresses tumor growth in nude mice bearing xenografts of human DU145 prostate cancer cells when administered intraperitoneally (i.p.) twice weekly for 5 wk [166]. This study also suggested that EZN-2968 has no significant effect on HIF-2α mRNA levels in vitro and only a weak effect on HIF-2α higher doses of EZN-2968 in vivo. EZN-2968 has been evaluated in two phase I clinical trials in lymphoma and advanced solid tumors in patients with liver metastasis. The results show that EZN-2968 is well tolerated in patients with advanced malignancies and a reduction in HIF-1α mRNA was observed in 4 of 6 patients with paired pre- and post-treatment tumor biopsies [167, 168]. A third phase I trial for EZN-2968 was conducted in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma but it terminated early because the primary endpoint (a reduction in HIF-1α mRNA expression level change after 1 cycle of treatment was not met) [169]. Like EZN-2968, a phytochemical celastrol (tripterine) was shown to significantly reduce the level of HIF-1α mRNA in cancer cells. It also inhibits the hypoxia-induced accumulation of nuclear HIF-1α protein under both normal and hypoxic conditions [170]. However, another study using human hepatoma cells indicates that celastrol inhibits HIF-1α protein synthesis without affecting its mRNA levels. In vivo studies confirmed the inhibitory effect of celastrol on HIF-1α with an accompanying decrease in tumor growth in a xenograft model established with HEP3B cells [171]. Compound C6, derived from modifications to the C-29 carboxyl group of celastrol, exerted a higher inhibition rate (74.03%) compared to 5-fluorouracil treatment (59.58% inhibition rate) in a mouse tumor xenograft model, with little toxicity [172]. Toxicity data in preclinical studies are promising, nevertheless, clinical studies have not been pursued to date [173,174,175]. The effects of celastrol on HIF-2α have not been tested to date.
Inhibitors of HIF-1 protein translation
Inhibitors of topoisomerase I and II, including Camptothecin (CPT) analogs, Topotecan (Hycamtins–TPT), and EZN-2208 (an active metabolite of irinotecan), have been found to prevent HIF-1α accumulation and decrease HIF-2α protein levels in cell lines and xenograft mouse models [176,177,178,179]. In mouse models of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), EZN-2208 was shown to improve the response to fludarabine [180]. Six phase I/phase II clinical trials have been conducted to study EZN-2208 in different solid tumors including metastatic breast cancer (NCT01036113) and metastatic colorectal cancer (NCT00931840). The studies have demonstrated that ENZ-2208 is well tolerated in most patients. The objective response rate (RR) and clinical benefit rate (CBR) were 22.5% and 36.7% among patients with metastatic TNBC [181]. However, in patients with advanced colorectal cancer, EZN-2208 in combination with cetuximab did not lead to a survival advantage compared to irinotecan plus cetuximab [182]. The clinical trials did not test the effect of EZN-2208 treatment on HIF signaling or expression in patient samples. CRLX101 is a nanoparticle comprised of CPT, pendant carboxylic acid groups, and linear, cyclodextrin-polyethylene glycol (CD-PEG) blocks. In a model of subcutaneously implanted A2780 human ovarian cells in nude mice, it reduces HIF-1α and HIF-2α protein expression. [183]. In a phase II clinical trial, CRLX101 demonstrated acceptable tolerability when used as a single agent or in combination with bevacizumab in patients with ovarian cancer. CRLX101, as a single agent led to an overall response rate (ORR) of 11%. The addition of bevacizumab increases the ORR to 18% [184]. Clinical trials that have focused on CRLX101 did not test the HIF-1 or HIF-2 protein levels or activity in patient samples.
HIF-1 DNA binding inhibitors
Originally isolated from Streptomyces echinatus, echinomycin binds to the core of the HIF-1/2α recognition sequence (5′–CGTG-3′), thus inhibiting the binding of HIF-1α/HIF-2α to cognate HREs [185]. In 2020, Bailey C, et al. reported that liposomal-echinomycin significantly inhibits primary tumor growth and metastasis in MDA-MB-231 and SUM-159 xenograft models [186]. Anthracyclines are widely used chemotherapeutic agents that can prevent HIF function. Several anthracyclines including Doxorubicin, Daunorubicin, Epirubicin, and Idarubicin have been demonstrated to disrupt HIF-1α and HIF-2α binding to DNA [187,188,189]. The daily injection of anthracyclines at low doses in tumor-bearing mice results in the inhibition of HIF-1α target gene expression and angiogenesis.[190].
Inhibitors of HIF-1 stability
An active component isolated from Angelica gigas roots, decursin, can regulate HIF-1α protein stability and promote its degradation, by increasing oxygen-dependent hydroxylation and ubiquitination [191]. However, the effects of decursin on HIF-2α have not been tested. Another HIF inhibitor 32-134D has been developed and effectively inhibits both HIF-1 and HIF-2 activity by promoting the degradation of HIF-1α and HIF-2α protein in HCC cells [192]. Previous studies in our lab demonstrated that mebendazole (MBZ), an FDA-approved anti-parasite drug, can inhibit the transcriptional activity of HIFs in breast cancer cell lines by decreasing HIF-1α, HIF-2α, and HIF-1β protein expression without affecting HIF mRNA levels [193].
HIF-2 specific inhibitors
To date, HIF-2α-specific inhibitors have progressed the farthest in clinical trials. Most exert their function by preventing HIF-2α heterodimerization with HIF-1β.
HIF-2 to HIF-1β DNA binding inhibitors
PT2385 (2,3-dihydro-1H-inden-4-yl-oxy derivative) is a HIF-2α-selective inhibitor currently under phase II clinical trials. This selective and orally active small-molecule inhibitor blocks HIF-2α dimerization with HIF-1β by binding the lipophilic cavity of the HIF-2α PAS-B domain [194]. PT2385 treatment reduces the expression of HIF-2α downstream gene products, including VEGF-A, PAI-1, and cyclin D1, and subsequently causes dramatic tumor regression in ccRCC [195]. Notably, preclinical studies showed favorable pharmacokinetic properties and a good safety profile of PT2385 with no adverse effect on cardiovascular performance. In phase I clinical trial (NCT02293980), PT2385 inhibited HIF-2α in ccRCC but also in normal tissue as measured by a reduction of EPO levels [196]. This resulted in anemia as one of the most frequent adverse events. Fortunately, the anemia was predominantly low-grade (grade 1 or 2, 35%; grade 3, 10%; no grade 4), and no patients discontinued treatment because of adverse events. To improve the pharmacokinetic profile of PT2385, a second-generation HIF-2α inhibitor PT2977 has been developed, and later renamed MK-6482 or belzutifan [195]. The first-in-human phase I clinical trial (NCT02974738) of PT2977 showed encouraging outcomes in patients with advanced ccRCC at a dose of 120 mg once daily [197]. In the phase II trial, MK-6482–004 (NCT03401788), patients with germline VHL mutations that had non-metastatic RCC, CNS hemangioblastomas, or pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETS) were treated with 120 mg of PT2977, once daily [198]. The median follow-up was 37.8 months. The ORR was 64% (39 out of 61) for RCC, 44% (22 out of 50) for CNS hemangioblastomas, and 91% (20 out of 22) for pNETS [199]. A randomized open-label phase III of PT2977 versus everolimus (NCT04195750) has been conducted in advanced ccRCC, which shows the progression-free survival (PFS) and ORR were superior with PT2977 vs everolimus [200]. In August 2021, the FDA approved PT2799 (belzutifan; WELIREG™) as the first HIF-2α inhibitor for the treatment of VHL disease as a therapy for RCC, CNS hemangioblastomas, or pNETS, that do not require an immediate surgery [201]. Meanwhile, work continues to develop even more specific inhibitors for HIF-2α. For example, YQ-0629 interacts with the PAS-B pocket of the HIF-2α protein and prevents its dimerization with HIF-1β thus abolishing a hypoxia-induced stem-like phenotype in breast cancer with a Kd of 57.5 uM [202]. Another small molecule, AB521, has recently been developed as a highly potent and selective HIF-2α inhibitor that avidly binds to the HIF-2α PAS-B domain, thereby inhibiting its heterodimerization with HIF-1β [203]. In preclinical experiments, AB521 causes a significant regression of the ccRCC tumors xenografts in mice. This orally available inhibitor is being tested in a phase I clinical trial for safety and pharmacokinetics as a monotherapy in patients with solid tumors and will be assessed for clinical efficacy in patients with ccRCC that have been previously treated (NCT05536141) [204].
Conclusions and perspectives
Hypoxia alters the biology of cancer cells within a solid tumor to promote angiogenesis, metastasis, and resistance to chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Numerous studies have provided convincing evidence that hypoxia-induced cellular adaptations are mediated via both HIF-1α and HIF-2α downstream signaling events. HIF-1α and HIF-2α have structural similarities and both undergo oxygen-dependent regulation. They have similar but also unique downstream target genes. This can be explained in part by different chromatin binding preferences for each HIF subunit. Both HIFs contribute to the formation of new blood vessels and subsequent invasion, with HIF-1α primarily responsible for directly activating pro-survival genes [38,39,40,41]. On the other hand, HIF-2α has additional roles in modulating vascular endothelial cells and macrophages in the TME [42, 43]. It is worth noting that both HIF-1 and HIF-2 have been shown to participate in various processes of tumor metabolism, angiogenesis, and metastasis. Due to space limitations, we will not elaborate on these aspects in detail here.
There has been an extensive array of inhibitors that have been documented for their ability to decrease HIF-1/2 activation in preclinical studies. Many of the inhibitors have also been shown to be efficacious in preclinical models for the treatment of cancer. Whether or not the reduction in HIF expression or activity is causative for the inhibitors’ efficacy is not always clear. In fact, most clinical trials testing the inhibitors described in this review do not include a pre-treatment or post-treatment measurement of HIF-1/2 levels or activity (see Table 1). If HIF-1/2 levels or activity have been considered as part of a clinical trial protocol, they have not been evaluated together or simultaneously stained in the same tissue sample. More recently, the ability to perform multiplexing in order to image multiple targets proteins of interest in the same tissue section has become more commonplace. In 2024, we developed a multiplex staining protocol for HIF-1 and HIF-2 that could be employed in the future to evaluate the expression of HIF-1 and -2 levels in the same FFPE tissue section [205]. In the future, this approach could also be useful for stratifying which patients would benefit from a HIF-1 versus a HIF-2 inhibitor. In our studies, multiplexed HIF-1 and HIF-2 staining in the biopsies of 15 patients diagnosed with TNBC revealed that HIF-1 and HIF-2 expression is colocalized in the same cell less than 50% of the time (unpublished observations). This is in line with recent studies discussed in this review that demonstrate that although several stimuli including hypoxia promote the expression of both HIF-1 and HIF-2, there are pathways that regulate HIF-1 and HIF-2 independently. A recent review summarized experimental data indicating that HIF-1 and HIF-2 play complementary roles in many cancers, which suggests that inhibiting both HIF-1 and HIF-2 could offer greater therapeutic benefits compared to targeting either factor alone [206]. HIF-2α specific inhibitors have been quickly progressing through clinical trials, and act by inhibiting the dimerization between HIF-2α and HIF-1β. Given the promising results with HIF-2α, HIF-1α inhibitors are likely to be next in line.
It is also important to note that when HIF-1α or HIF-2α expression has been evaluated in tumor biopsies, some samples show a pattern of HIF expression that is likely due to hypoxia. For example, there is a gradient in HIF-1α expression with cells located furthest from a blood vessel showing high HIF-1α expression and those farther from a blood vessel with less HIF expression. Other biopsies show patterns of HIF-1α or -2α expression that are independent of O2 gradients, suggesting that O2-independent mechanisms may be responsible for increased expression [207]. Knowing the stimulus that leads to HIF-1/2 α overexpression will be beneficial in designing an effective therapeutic and to have a better arsenal against therapeutic resistance. For example, if aberrant expression of tyrosine kinases such as PI3K/AKT and/or MAP kinases cause HIF-overexpression, inhibitors targeting these specific pathways may be a promising treatment option.
Given the recent success of immunotherapies, there has been a growing interest in determining the role of HIF-1/2α expression in the immune microenvironment. The cross-talk between HIF and PD-1/PD-L1 pathways has become well recognized [208,209,210]. A preclinical study showed that the combination of HIF-1α inhibition and immune checkpoint inhibitors can significantly improve tumor regression in the setting of non-small cell lung cancer [211]. Furthermore, a phase 3 clinical trial (NCT05239728) began in 2022 and aims to access the efficacy and safety of the combination of the HIF-2α-specific inhibitor, belzutifan, and PD-1 inhibitor, pembrolizumab [212]. The results of these trials will indicate whether immunotherapies combined with HIF inhibitors will be beneficial as a novel cancer therapy.
In general, gaining a more profound insight into the biology of both HIF-1α and HIF-2α will be crucial for providing additional treatment strategies for cancer. Future work should focus on the development of more specific and selective HIF-1/2α inhibitors.
Data availability
Not applicable.
References
Muz B, de la Puente P, Azab F, Kareem Azab A (2015) The role of hypoxia in cancer progression, angiogenesis, metastasis, and resistance to therapy. Hypoxia 83–92. https://doi.org/10.2147/HP.S93413
Zenewicz LA (2017) Oxygen levels and immunological studies. Front Immunol 8:324. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2017.00324
McKeown SR (2014) Defining normoxia, physoxia and hypoxia in tumours—implications for treatment response. Br J Radiol 87:20130676. https://doi.org/10.1259/BJR.20130676
Crabtree HG, Cramer W (1933) The action of radium on cancer cells. II.—Some factors determining the susceptibility of cancer cells to radium. Proc R Soc Lond B 113:238–250. https://doi.org/10.1098/RSPB.1933.0044
Soeda A, Park M, Lee D et al (2009) Hypoxia promotes expansion of the CD133-positive glioma stem cells through activation of HIF-1α. Oncogene 28:3949–3959. https://doi.org/10.1038/onc.2009.252
Li P, Zhou C, Xu L, Xiao H (2013) Hypoxia enhances stemness of cancer stem cells in glioblastoma: an in vitro study. Int J Med Sci 10:399. https://doi.org/10.7150/ijms.5407
Li H, Su X, Li J et al (2022) Hypoxia induces docetaxel resistance in triple-negative breast cancer via the HIF-1α/miR-494/Survivin signaling pathway. Neoplasia 32:100821. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.NEO.2022.100821
Xu K, Zhan Y, Yuan Z et al (2019) Hypoxia induces drug resistance in colorectal cancer through the HIF-1α/miR-338-5p/IL-6 Feedback Loop. Mol Ther 27:1810–1824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymthe.2019.05.017
Godet I, Mamo M, Thurnheer A et al (2021) Post-hypoxic cells promote metastatic recurrence after chemotherapy treatment in TNBC. Cancers 13:5509. https://doi.org/10.3390/CANCERS13215509
Höckel M, Schlenger K, Aral B et al (1996) Association between tumor hypoxia and malignant progression in advanced cancer of the uterine cervix. Cancer Res 56:4509–4515
Rankin EB, Giaccia AJ (2016) Hypoxic control of metastasis. Science 352:175–180. https://doi.org/10.1126/SCIENCE.AAF4405
Wang Y, Roche O, Xu C et al (2012) Hypoxia promotes ligand-independent EGF receptor signaling via hypoxia-inducible factor-mediated upregulation of caveolin-1. Proc Natl Acad Sci 109:4892–4897. https://doi.org/10.1073/PNAS.1112129109
Hirschhaeuser F, Sattler UG, Mueller-Klieser W (2011) Lactate: a metabolic key player in cancer. Cancer Res 71:6921–6925. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-1457
Semenza GL (2013) HIF-1 mediates metabolic responses to intratumoral hypoxia and oncogenic mutations. J Clin Invest 123:3664–3671. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI67230
Fukai K, Nakamura A, Hoshino A et al (2015) Pyk2 aggravates hypoxia-induced pulmonary hypertension by activating HIF-1α. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 308:H951–H959. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.00770.2014
Zhang X, Guan T, Yang B et al (2019) Protective effect of berberine on high glucose and hypoxia-induced apoptosis via the modulation of HIF-1α in renal tubular epithelial cells. Am J Transl Res 11:669
Shohet RV, Garcia JA (2007) Keeping the engine primed: HIF factors as key regulators of cardiac metabolism and angiogenesis during ischemia. J Mol Med 85:1309–1315. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00109-007-0279-x
Maxwell PH, Eckardt KU (2016) HIF prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors for the treatment of renal anaemia and beyond. Nat Rev Nephrol 12:157–168. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrneph.2015.193
Semenza GL, Wang GL (1992) A nuclear factor induced by hypoxia via de novo protein synthesis binds to the human erythropoietin gene enhancer at a site required for transcriptional activation. Mol Cell Biol 12:5447–5454. https://doi.org/10.1128/mcb.12.12.5447-5454.1992
Wang GL, Semenza GL (1995) Purification and characterization of hypoxia-inducible factor. J Biol Chem 270:1230–1237. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.270.3.1230
Huang R, Zhou PK (2020) HIF-1 signaling: A key orchestrator of cancer radioresistance. Radiat Med Prot 1:7–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RADMP.2020.01.006
Davis L, Recktenwald M, Hutt E et al (2022) Targeting HIF-2α in the tumor microenvironment: redefining the role of HIF-2α for solid cancer therapy. Cancers 14:1259. https://doi.org/10.3390/CANCERS14051259
Ravenna L, Salvatori L, Russo MA (2016) HIF3α: the little we know. FEBS J 283:993–1003. https://doi.org/10.1111/FEBS.13572
Jiang BH, Rue E, Wang GL et al (1996) Dimerization, DNA binding, and transactivation properties of hypoxia- inducible factor 1. J Biol Chem 271:17771–17778. https://doi.org/10.1074/JBC.271.30.17771
Kotch LE, Iyer NV, Laughner E, Semenza GL (1999) Defective vascularization of HIF-1α-null embryos is not associated with VEGF deficiency but with mesenchymal cell death. Dev Biol 209:254–267. https://doi.org/10.1006/dbio.1999.9253
Compernolle V, Brusselmans K, Acker T et al (2002) Loss of HIF-2α and inhibition of VEGF impair fetal lung maturation, whereas treatment with VEGF prevents fatal respiratory distress in premature mice. Nat Med 8:702–710. https://doi.org/10.1038/nm721
Peng J, Zhang L, Drysdale L, Fong GH (2000) The transcription factor EPAS-1/hypoxia-inducible factor 2α plays an important role in vascular remodeling. Proc Natl Acad Sci 97:8386–8391. https://doi.org/10.1073/PNAS.140087397
Scortegagna M, Morris MA, Oktay Y et al (2003) The HIF family member EPAS1/HIF-2α is required for normal hematopoiesis in mice. Blood 102:1634–1640. https://doi.org/10.1182/BLOOD-2003-02-0448
Jiang H, Guo R, Powell-Coffman JA (2001) The Caenorhabditis elegans hif-1 gene encodes a bHLH-PAS protein that is required for adaptation to hypoxia. Proc Natl Acad Sci 98:7916–7921. https://doi.org/10.1073/PNAS.141234698
Dames SA, Martinez-Yamout M, De Guzman RN et al (2002) Structural basis for Hif-1α/CBP recognition in the cellular hypoxic response. Proc Natl Acad Sci 99:5271–5276. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.082121399
Bruick RK, McKnight SL (2001) A conserved family of prolyl-4-hydroxylases that modify HIF. Science 294:1337–1340. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1066373
Tian H, McKnight SL, Russell DW (1997) Endothelial PAS domain protein 1 (EPAS1), a transcription factor selectively expressed in endothelial cells. Genes Dev 11:72–82. https://doi.org/10.1101/GAD.11.1.72
Hu CJ, Sataur A, Wang L et al (2007) The N-terminal transactivation domain confers target gene specificity of hypoxia-inducible factors HIF-1α and HIF-2α. Mol Biol Cell 18:4528–4542. https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.e06-05-0419
Arany Z, Huang LE, Eckner R et al (1996) An essential role for p300/CBP in the cellular response to hypoxia. Proc Natl Acad Sci 93:12969–12973. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.93.23.12969
Pawlus MR, Wang L, Hu CJ (2014) STAT3 and HIF1α cooperatively activate HIF1 target genes in MDA-MB-231 and RCC4 cells. Oncogene 33:1670–1679. https://doi.org/10.1038/onc.2013.115
Pawlus MR, Wang L, Ware K, Hu C-J (2012) Upstream stimulatory factor 2 and hypoxia-inducible factor 2α (HIF2α) cooperatively activate HIF2 target genes during hypoxia. Mol Cell Biol 32:4595–4610. https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.00724-12
Luo JC, Shibuya M (2001) A variant of nuclear localization signal of bipartite-type is required for the nuclear translocation of hypoxia inducible factors (1α, 2α and 3α). Oncogene 20:1435–1444. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1204228
Manuelli V, Pecorari C, Filomeni G, Zito E (2022) Regulation of redox signaling in HIF-1-dependent tumor angiogenesis. FEBS J 289:5413–5425. https://doi.org/10.1111/FEBS.16110
Leung E, Cairns RA, Chaudary N et al (2017) Metabolic targeting of HIF-dependent glycolysis reduces lactate, increases oxygen consumption and enhances response to high-dose single-fraction radiotherapy in hypoxic solid tumors. BMC Cancer 17:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/S12885-017-3402-6
Lu Y, Wang L, Ding W et al (2019) Ammonia mediates mitochondrial uncoupling and promotes glycolysis via HIF-1 activation in human breast cancer MDA-MB-231 cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 519:153–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BBRC.2019.08.152
Kierans SJ, Taylor CT (2021) Regulation of glycolysis by the hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF): implications for cellular physiology. J Physiol 599:23–37. https://doi.org/10.1113/JP280572
Befani C, Liakos P (2018) The role of hypoxia-inducible factor-2 alpha in angiogenesis. J Cell Physiol 233:9087–9098. https://doi.org/10.1002/JCP.26805
Serocki M, Bartoszewska S, Janaszak-Jasiecka A et al (2018) miRNAs regulate the HIF switch during hypoxia: a novel therapeutic target. Angiogenesis 21:183–202. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10456-018-9600-2
Wiener CM, Booth G, Semenza GL (1996) In vivoexpression of mRNAs encoding hypoxia-inducible factor 1. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 225:485–488. https://doi.org/10.1006/BBRC.1996.1199
Wiesener MS, Jürgensen JS, Rosenberger C et al (2003) Widespread hypoxia-inducible expression of HIF-2alpha in distinct cell populations of different organs. FASEB J 17:271–273. https://doi.org/10.1096/FJ.02-0445FJE
Zhong H, De MA, Laughner E et al (1999) Overexpression of hypoxia-inducible factor 1α in common human cancers and their metastases. Cancer Res 59:5830–5835
Han S, Huang T, Hou F et al (2019) The prognostic value of hypoxia-inducible factor-1α in advanced cancer survivors: a meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis. Ther Adv Med Oncol 11:1758835919875851. https://doi.org/10.1177/1758835919875851
Jun JC, Rathore A, Younas H et al (2017) Hypoxia-Inducible Factors and Cancer. Curr Sleep Med Rep 3:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/S40675-017-0062-7
Dales JP, Garcia S, Meunier-Carpentier S et al (2005) Overexpression of hypoxia-inducible factor HIF-1α predicts early relapse in breast cancer: Retrospective study in a series of 745 patients. Int J Cancer 116:734–739. https://doi.org/10.1002/IJC.20984
Ren W, Mi D, Yang K et al (2013) The expression of hypoxia-inducible factor-1α and its clinical significance in lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Swiss Med Wkly 143:w13855–w13855. https://doi.org/10.4414/SMW.2013.13855
Schödel J, Oikonomopoulos S, Ragoussis J et al (2011) High-resolution genome-wide mapping of HIF-binding sites by ChIP-seq. Blood 117:e207–e217. https://doi.org/10.1182/BLOOD-2010-10-314427
Lombardi O, Li R, Halim S, et al (2022) Pan-cancer analysis of tissue and single-cell HIF-pathway activation using a conserved gene signature. Cell Rep 41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2022.111652
Smythies JA, Sun M, Masson N, et al (2019) Inherent DNA ‐binding specificities of the HIF ‐1α and HIF ‐2α transcription factors in chromatin . EMBO Rep 20:. https://doi.org/10.15252/EMBR.201846401/SUPPL_FILE/EMBR201846401-SUP-0004-TABLEEV3.XLSX
Mamo M, Ye IC, DiGiacomo JW et al (2020) Hypoxia alters the response to anti-EGFR therapy by regulating EGFR expression and downstream signaling in a DNA methylation-specific and hif-dependent manner. Cancer Res 80:4998–5010. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-20-1232
D’Anna F, Van Dyck L, Xiong J et al (2020) DNA methylation repels binding of hypoxia-inducible transcription factors to maintain tumor immunotolerance. Genome Biol 21:1–36. https://doi.org/10.1186/S13059-020-02087-Z
Keith B, Johnson RS, Simon MC (2012) HIF1α and HIF2α: sibling rivalry in hypoxic tumour growth and progression. Nat Rev Cancer 12:9–22. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc3183
Cockman ME, Masson N, Mole DR et al (2000) Hypoxia inducible factor-α binding and ubiquitylation by the von Hippel-Lindau tumor suppressor protein. J Biol Chem 275:25733–25741. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M002740200
Ivanov S, Liao SY, Ivanova A et al (2001) Expression of hypoxia-inducible cell-surface transmembrane carbonic anhydrases in human cancer. Am J Pathol 158:905–919. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9440(10)64038-2
Jaakkola P, Mole DR, Tian YM et al (1979) (2001) Targeting of HIF-α to the von Hippel-Lindau ubiquitylation complex by O2-regulated prolyl hydroxylation. Science 292:468–472. https://doi.org/10.1126/SCIENCE.1059796
Hu CJ, Wang LY, Chodosh LA et al (2003) Differential roles of hypoxia-inducible factor 1α (HIF-1α) and HIF-2α in hypoxic gene regulation. Mol Cell Biol 23:9361–9374. https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.23.24.9361-9374.2003
Yang M, Su H, Soga T, et al (2014) Prolyl hydroxylase domain enzymes: important regulators of cancer metabolism. Hypoxia 127–142. https://doi.org/10.2147/hp.s47968
Appelhoffl RJ, Tian YM, Raval RR et al (2004) Differential function of the prolyl hydroxylases PHD1, PHD2, and PHD3 in the regulation of hypoxia-inducible factor. J Biol Chem 279:38458–38465. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M406026200
Tsai YM, Wu KL, Chang YY et al (2020) Loss of miR-145-5p causes ceruloplasmin interference with PHD-iron axis and HIF-2α stabilization in lung adenocarcinoma-mediated angiogenesis. Int J Mol Sci 21:5081. https://doi.org/10.3390/IJMS21145081
Fielding JW, Hodson EJ, Cheng X et al (2018) PHD2 inactivation in Type I cells drives HIF-2α-dependent multilineage hyperplasia and the formation of paraganglioma-like carotid bodies. J Physiol 596:4393–4412. https://doi.org/10.1113/JP275996
Semenza GL (2010) Defining the role of hypoxia-inducible factor 1 in cancer biology and therapeutics. Oncogene 29:625–634. https://doi.org/10.1038/onc.2009.441
Lando D, Peet DJ, Gorman JJ et al (2002) FIH-1 is an asparaginyl hydroxylase enzyme that regulates the transcriptional activity of hypoxia-inducible factor. Genes Dev 16:1466–1471. https://doi.org/10.1101/GAD.991402
Kaelin WG, Ratcliffe PJ (2008) Oxygen sensing by metazoans: the central role of the HIF hydroxylase pathway. Mol Cell 30:393–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2008.04.009
Pappalardi MB, McNulty DE, Martin JD et al (2011) Biochemical characterization of human HIF hydroxylases using HIF protein substrates that contain all three hydroxylation sites. Biochem J 436:363–369. https://doi.org/10.1042/BJ20101201
Bracken CP, Fedele AO, Linke S et al (2006) Cell-specific regulation of hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF)-1α and HIF-2α stabilization and transactivation in a graded oxygen environment. J Biol Chem 281:22575–22585. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M600288200
Mahon PC, Hirota K, Semenza GL (2001) FIH-1: a novel protein that interacts with HIF-1α and VHL to mediate repression of HIF-1 transcriptional activity. Genes Dev 15:2675–2686. https://doi.org/10.1101/GAD.924501
Jeong JW, Bae MK, Ahn MY et al (2002) Regulation and destabilization of HIF-1α by ARD1-mediated acetylation. Cell 111:709–720. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(02)01085-1
Lee D, Jang MK, Seo JH et al (2018) ARD1/NAA10 in hepatocellular carcinoma: pathways and clinical implications. Exp Mol Med 50:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1038/s12276-018-0106-1
Yoo YG, Kong G, Lee MO (2006) Metastasis-associated protein 1 enhances stability of hypoxia-inducible factor-1α protein by recruiting histone deacetylase 1. EMBO J 25:1231–1241. https://doi.org/10.1038/SJ.EMBOJ.7601025
Chen C, Wei M, Wang C et al (2020) The histone deacetylase HDAC1 activates HIF1α/VEGFA signal pathway in colorectal cancer. Gene 754:144851. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.GENE.2020.144851
Lim JH, Lee YM, Chun YS et al (2010) Sirtuin 1 modulates cellular responses to hypoxia by deacetylating hypoxia-inducible factor 1alpha. Mol Cell 38:864–878. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MOLCEL.2010.05.023
Chen R, Xu M, Hogg RT et al (2012) The acetylase/deacetylase couple CREB-binding protein/sirtuin 1 controls hypoxia-inducible factor 2 signaling. J Biol Chem 287:30800–30811. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M111.244780
Yoon H, Shin SH, Shin DH, et al (2014) Differential roles of Sirt1 in HIF-1α and HIF-2α mediated hypoxic responses. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2014.01.001
Geng H, Liu Q, Xue C et al (2012) HIF1α protein stability is increased by acetylation at lysine 709. J Biol Chem 287:35496–35505. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M112.400697
Guillen-Quispe YN, Kim SJ, Saeidi S et al (2023) Oxygen-independent stabilization of HIF-2α in breast cancer through direct interaction with peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase NIMA-interacting 1. Free Radic Biol Med 207:296–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.FREERADBIOMED.2023.07.020
Han HJ, Kwon N, Choi MA et al (2016) Peptidyl Prolyl Isomerase PIN1 Directly Binds to and Stabilizes Hypoxia-Inducible Factor-1α. PLoS ONE 11:e0147038. https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0147038
Bae SH, Jeong JW, Park JA et al (2004) Sumoylation increases HIF-1alpha stability and its transcriptional activity. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 324:394–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BBRC.2004.09.068
Cheng J, Kang X, Zhang S, Yeh ETH (2007) SUMO-specific protease 1 is essential for stabilization of HIF1alpha during hypoxia. Cell 131:584–595. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CELL.2007.08.045
Lin X, Wang Y, Jiang Y et al (2020) Sumoylation enhances the activity of the TGF-β/SMAD and HIF-1 signaling pathways in keloids. Life Sci 255:117859. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.LFS.2020.117859
Malkov MI, Flood D, Taylor CT (2023) SUMOylation indirectly suppresses activity of the HIF-1α pathway in intestinal epithelial cells. J Biol Chem 299:. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbc.2023.105280
van Hagen M, Overmeer RM, Abolvardi SS, Vertegaal ACO (2010) RNF4 and VHL regulate the proteasomal degradation of SUMO-conjugated Hypoxia-Inducible Factor-2α. Nucl Acids Res 38:1922–1931. https://doi.org/10.1093/NAR/GKP1157
Filippopoulou C, Simos G, Chachami G (2020) The role of sumoylation in the response to hypoxia: an overview. Cells 9:2359. https://doi.org/10.3390/CELLS9112359
Kobayashi Y, Oguro A, Imaoka S (2021) Feedback of hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha (HIF-1alpha) transcriptional activity via redox factor-1 (Ref-1) induction by reactive oxygen species (ROS). Free Radic Res 55:154–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/10715762.2020.1870685
Pozzer D, Invernizzi RW, Blaauw B et al (2021) Ascorbic acid route to the endoplasmic reticulum: function and role in disease. Antioxid Redox Signal 34:845–855. https://doi.org/10.1089/ars.2019.7912
Cha J, Roomi MW, Ivanov V et al (2013) Ascorbate supplementation inhibits growth and metastasis of B16FO melanoma and 4T1 breast cancer cells in vitamin C-deficient mice. Int J Oncol 42:55–64. https://doi.org/10.3892/IJO.2012.1712
Ho DJJ, Jeffrey Man HS, Marsden PA (2012) Nitric oxide signaling in hypoxia. J Mol Med 90:217–231. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00109-012-0880-5
Li F, Sonveaux P, Rabbani ZN et al (2007) Regulation of HIF-1α stability through S-nitrosylation. Mol Cell 26:63–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2007.02.024
Hendrickson MD, Poyton RO (2015) Crosstalk between nitric oxide and hypoxia-inducible factor signaling pathways: an update. Res Rep Biochem 147–161. https://doi.org/10.2147/RRBC.S58280
Kaelin WG Jr (2017) The VHL tumor suppressor gene: insights into oxygen sensing and cancer. Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc 128:298
Peng S, Zhang J, Tan X et al (2020) The VHL/HIF axis in the development and treatment of pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma. Front Endocrinol 11:586857. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2020.586857
Liu Z, Zhou J, Li L et al (2020) Intronic mutation of the VHL gene associated with central nervous system hemangioblastomas in two Chinese families with von Hippel-Lindau disease: Case report. BMC Med Genet 21:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1186/S12881-020-01126-7
Crespigio J, Berbel LCL, Dias MA et al (2018) Von Hippel-Lindau disease: a single gene, several hereditary tumors. J Endocrinol Invest 41:21–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/S40618-017-0683-1
Arjumand W, Sultana S (2012) Role of VHL gene mutation in human renal cell carcinoma. Tumor Biology 33:9–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/S13277-011-0257-3
Zhang C, Liu J, Wang J et al (2021) The interplay between tumor suppressor p53 and hypoxia signaling pathways in cancer. Front Cell Dev Biol 9:648808. https://doi.org/10.3389/FCELL.2021.648808
Singh D, Arora R, Kaur P et al (2017) Overexpression of hypoxia-inducible factor and metabolic pathways: possible targets of cancer. Cell Biosci 7:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/S13578-017-0190-2
Liu J, Zhang C, Zhao Y et al (2017) Parkin targets HIF-1α for ubiquitination and degradation to inhibit breast tumor progression. Nat Commun 8:1823. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-01947-w
Ravi R, Mookerjee B, Bhujwalla ZM et al (2000) Regulation of tumor angiogenesis by p53-induced degradation of hypoxia-inducible factor 1α. Genes Dev 14:34–44. https://doi.org/10.1101/GAD.14.1.34
Kojima K, McQueen T, Chen Y et al (2011) p53 activation of mesenchymal stromal cells partially abrogates microenvironment-mediated resistance to FLT3 inhibition in AML through HIF-1α–mediated down-regulation of CXCL12. Blood 118:4431–4439. https://doi.org/10.1182/BLOOD-2011-02-334136
Choy MK, Movassagh M, Bennett MR, Foo RSY (2010) PKB/Akt activation inhibits p53-mediated HIF1A degradation that is independent of MDM2. J Cell Physiol 222:635–639. https://doi.org/10.1002/JCP.21980
Zhang C, Liu J, Xu D et al (2020) Gain-of-function mutant p53 in cancer progression and therapy. J Mol Cell Biol 12:674–687. https://doi.org/10.1093/JMCB/MJAA040
Montagner M, Enzo E, Forcato M et al (2012) SHARP1 suppresses breast cancer metastasis by promoting degradation of hypoxia-inducible factors. Nature 487:380–384. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11207
Adorno M, Cordenonsi M, Montagner M et al (2009) A mutant-p53/Smad complex opposes p63 to empower TGFβ-induced metastasis. Cell 137:87–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2009.01.039
Vleugel MM, Shvarts D, van der Wall E, van Diest PJ (2006) p300 and p53 levels determine activation of HIF-1 downstream targets in invasive breast cancer. Hum Pathol 37:1085–1092. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.HUMPATH.2006.03.015
Schmid T, Zhou J, Köhl R, Brüne B (2004) p300 relieves p53-evoked transcriptional repression of hypoxia-inducible factor-1 (HIF-1). Biochem J 380:289–295. https://doi.org/10.1042/BJ20031299
Lee SH, Kang JH, Ha JS et al (2020) Transglutaminase 2-mediated p53 depletion promotes angiogenesis by increasing HIF-1α-p300 binding in renal cell carcinoma. Int J Mol Sci 21:5042. https://doi.org/10.3390/IJMS21145042
Courtney KD, Ma Y, de Leon AD et al (2020) HIF-2 complex dissociation, target inhibition, and acquired resistance with PT2385, a first-in-class HIF-2 inhibitor, in patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 26:793–803. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-19-1459
Zundel W, Schindler C, Haas-Kogan D et al (2000) Loss of PTEN facilitates HIF-1-mediated gene expression. Genes Dev 14:391–396. https://doi.org/10.1101/GAD.14.4.391
He Z, Chen AY, Rojanasakul Y et al (2016) Gallic acid, a phenolic compound, exerts anti-angiogenic effects via the PTEN/AKT/HIF-1α/VEGF signaling pathway in ovarian cancer cells. Oncol Rep 35:291–297. https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2015.4354
Domènech M, Hernández A, Plaja A, et al (2021) Hypoxia: The cornerstone of glioblastoma. Int J Mol Sci 22: 12608
Joshi S, Singh AR, Zulcic M, Durden DL (2014) A macrophage-dominant PI3K isoform controls hypoxia-induced HIF1α and HIF2α stability and tumor growth, angiogenesis, and metastasis. Molecular Cancer Research 12:. https://doi.org/10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-13-0682
Li C, Xiong W, Liu X et al (2019) Hypomethylation at non-CpG/CpG sites in the promoter of HIF-1α gene combined with enhanced H3K9Ac modification contribute to maintain higher HIF-1α expression in breast cancer. Oncogenesis 8:26. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41389-019-0135-1
Cui J, Duan B, Zhao X et al (2016) MBD3 mediates epigenetic regulation on EPAS1 promoter in cancer. Tumor Biology 37:13455–13467. https://doi.org/10.1007/S13277-016-5237-1
Schmitt AM, Schmid S, Rudolph T et al (2009) VHL inactivation is an important pathway for the development of malignant sporadic pancreatic endocrine tumors. Endocr Relat Cancer 16:1219–1227. https://doi.org/10.1677/ERC-08-0297
Li T, Mao C, Wang X et al (2020) Epigenetic crosstalk between hypoxia and tumor driven by HIF regulation. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 39:1–25. https://doi.org/10.1186/S13046-020-01733-5
Bao L, Chen Y, Lai HT et al (2018) Methylation of hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF)-1α by G9a/GLP inhibits HIF-1 transcriptional activity and cell migration. Nucl Acids Res 46:6576–6591. https://doi.org/10.1093/NAR/GKY449
Long M, Zhu Y, Chen Z et al (2020) Lysine-specific demethylase 1 affects the progression of papillary thyroid carcinoma via HIF1α and microRNA-146a. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 105:2237–2251. https://doi.org/10.1210/CLINEM/DGAA182
Richard DE, Berra E, Gothié E et al (1999) p42/p44 mitogen-activated protein kinases phosphorylate hypoxia- reducible factor (HIF-1α) and enhance the transcriptional activity of HIF-1. J Biol Chem 274:32631–32637. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.274.46.32631
Dong S, Liang S, Cheng Z et al (2022) ROS/PI3K/Akt and Wnt/β-catenin signalings activate HIF-1α-induced metabolic reprogramming to impart 5-fluorouracil resistance in colorectal cancer. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 41:1–27. https://doi.org/10.1186/S13046-021-02229-6
Gingras AC, Gygi SP, Raught B et al (1999) Regulation of 4E-BP1 phosphorylation: a novel two-step mechanism. Genes Dev 13:1422–1437. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.13.11.1422
Düvel K, Yecies JL, Menon S, et al (2010) Activation of a metabolic gene regulatory network downstream of mTOR complex 1. Mol Cell 39:. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2010.06.022
Gkotinakou IM, Kechagia E, Pazaitou-Panayiotou K et al (2020) Calcitriol suppresses HIF-1 and HIF-2 transcriptional activity by reducing HIF-1/2α protein levels via a VDR-independent mechanism. Cells 9:2440. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells9112440
Dodd KM, Yang J, Shen MH et al (2015) mTORC1 drives HIF-1α and VEGF-A signalling via multiple mechanisms involving 4E-BP1, S6K1 and STAT3. Oncogene 34:2239–2250. https://doi.org/10.1038/onc.2014.164
Toschi A, Lee E, Gadi N et al (2008) Differential dependence of hypoxia-inducible factors 1α and 2α on mTORC1 and mTORC2. J Biol Chem 283:34495–34499. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.C800170200
Mohlin S, Hamidian A, Von Stedingk K et al (2015) PI3K-mTORC2 but not PI3K-mTORC1 regulates transcription of HIF2A/EPAS1and vascularization in neuroblastoma. Cancer Res 75:4617–4628. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-15-0708
Malekan M, Ebrahimzadeh MA, Sheida F (2021) The role of Hypoxia-Inducible Factor-1alpha and its signaling in melanoma. Biomed Pharmacother 141:111873. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BIOPHA.2021.111873
Qi X, Zhang S, Chen Z et al (2022) EGPI-1, a novel eIF4E/eIF4G interaction inhibitor, inhibits lung cancer cell growth and angiogenesis through Ras/MNK/ERK/eIF4E signaling pathway. Chem Biol Interact 352:109773. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CBI.2021.109773
Laughner E, Taghavi P, Chiles K et al (2001) HER2 (neu) Signaling Increases the Rate of Hypoxia-Inducible Factor 1α (HIF-1α) synthesis: novel mechanism for HIF-1-mediated vascular endothelial growth factor expression. Mol Cell Biol 21:3995–4004. https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.21.12.3995-4004.2001
Agani F, Semenza GL (1998) Mersalyl is a novel inducer of vascular endothelial growth factor gene expression and hypoxia-inducible factor 1 activity. Mol Pharmacol 54:749–754. https://doi.org/10.1124/MOL.54.5.749
Mabjeesh NJ, Willard MT, Frederickson CE et al (2003) Androgens stimulate hypoxia-inducible factor 1 activation via autocrine loop of tyrosine kinase receptor/phosphatidylinositol 3′-kinase/protein kinase B in prostate cancer cells. Clin Cancer Res 9:2416–2425
Mylonis I, Chachami G, Samiotaki M et al (2006) Identification of MAPK phosphorylation sites and their role in the localization and activity of hypoxia-inducible factor-1α. J Biol Chem 281:33095–33106. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M605058200
Gkotinakou IM, Befani C, Simos G, Liakos P (2019) ERK1/2 phosphorylates HIF-2α and regulates its activity by controlling its CRM1-dependent nuclear shuttling. J Cell Sci 132:jcs225698. https://doi.org/10.1242/JCS.225698
Gkotinakou IM, Befani C, Samiotaki M et al (2021) Novel HIF-2α interaction with Reptin52 impairs HIF-2 transcriptional activity and EPO secretion. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 557:143–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BBRC.2021.03.176
Lee JS, Kim Y, Kim IS, et al (2010) Negative Regulation of Hypoxic Responses via Induced Reptin Methylation. Mol Cell 39:. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2010.06.008
Bullen JW, Tchernyshyov I, Holewinski RJ, et al (2016) Protein kinase A-dependent phosphorylation stimulates the transcriptional activity of hypoxia-inducible factor. Sci Signal 9:ra56–ra56. https://doi.org/10.1126/SCISIGNAL.AAF0583
Knippschild U, Krüger M, Richter J et al (2014) The CK1 family: Contribution to cellular stress response and its role in carcinogenesis. Front Oncol 4:96. https://doi.org/10.3389/FONC.2014.00096
Kalousi A, Mylonis I, Politou AS et al (2010) Casein kinase 1 regulates human hypoxia-inducible factor HIF-1. J Cell Sci 123:2976–2986. https://doi.org/10.1242/JCS.068122
Koyasu S, Kobayashi M, Goto Y et al (2018) Regulatory mechanisms of hypoxia-inducible factor 1 activity: Two decades of knowledge. Cancer Sci 109:560–571. https://doi.org/10.1111/CAS.13483
Pangou E, Befani C, Mylonis I et al (2016) HIF-2α phosphorylation by CK1δ promotes erythropoietin secretion in liver cancer cells under hypoxia. J Cell Sci 129:4213–4226. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.191395
Gradin K, Takasaki C, Fujii-Kuriyama Y, Sogawa K (2002) The transcriptional activation function of the HIF-like factor requires phosphorylation at a conserved threonine. J Biol Chem 277:23508–23514. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M201307200
Gradin K, McGuire J, Wenger RH et al (1996) Functional Interference between Hypoxia and Dioxin Signal Transduction Pathways: Competition for Recruitment of the Arnt Transcription Factor. Mol Cell Biol 16:5221–5231. https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.16.10.5221
Tang X, Chang C, Hao M et al (2021) Heat shock protein-90alpha (Hsp90α) stabilizes hypoxia-inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α) in support of spermatogenesis and tumorigenesis. Cancer Gene Ther 28:1058–1070. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41417-021-00316-6
Liu YV, Semenza GL (2007) RACK1 vs. HSP90: Competition for HIF-1α degradation vs. stabilization. Cell Cycle 6:656–659. https://doi.org/10.4161/CC.6.6.3981
Xu YC, Gu Y, Yang JY et al (2021) RACK1 mediates the advanced glycation end product-induced degradation of HIF-1α in nucleus pulposus cells via competing with HSP90 for HIF-1α binding. Cell Biol Int 45:1316–1326. https://doi.org/10.1002/CBIN.11574
Liu YV, Baek JH, Zhang H et al (2007) RACK1 competes with HSP90 for binding to HIF-1alpha and is required for O(2)-independent and HSP90 inhibitor-induced degradation of HIF-1alpha. Mol Cell 25:207–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MOLCEL.2007.01.001
Katschinski DM, Le L, Schindler SG et al (2004) Interaction of the PAS B Domain with HSP90 Accelerates Hypoxia-Inducible Factor-1α Stabilization. Cell Physiol Biochem 14:351–360. https://doi.org/10.1159/000080345
Luo W, Zhong J, Chang R et al (2010) Hsp70 and CHIP selectively mediate ubiquitination and degradation of hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF)-1α but not HIF-2α. J Biol Chem 285:3651–3663. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M109.068577
Meng X, Lin Z, Cao S et al (2022) Estrogen-mediated downregulation of HIF-1α signaling in B lymphocytes influences postmenopausal bone loss. Bone Res 10:15. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41413-022-00189-x
Hellwig-Bürgel T, Rutkowski K, Metzen E et al (1999) Interleukin-1β and Tumor Necrosis Factor-α Stimulate DNA Binding of Hypoxia-Inducible Factor-1. Blood 94:1561–1567. https://doi.org/10.1182/BLOOD.V94.5.1561
Stiehl DP, Jelkmann W, Wenger RH, Hellwig-Bürgel T (2002) Normoxic induction of the hypoxia-inducible factor 1α by insulin and interleukin-1β involves the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase pathway. FEBS Lett 512:157–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-5793(02)02247-0
Qian D, Lin HY, Wang HM et al (2004) Normoxic Induction of the Hypoxic-Inducible Factor-1α by Interleukin-1β Involves the Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinase 1/2 Pathway in Normal Human Cytotrophoblast Cells. Biol Reprod 70:1822–1827. https://doi.org/10.1095/BIOLREPROD.103.025031
Naldini A, Filippi I, Miglietta D et al (2010) Interleukin-1β regulates the migratory potential of MDAMB231 breast cancer cells through the hypoxia-inducible factor-1α. Eur J Cancer 46:3400–3408. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EJCA.2010.07.044
Li S, Huang C, Hu G et al (2022) Correction: Tumor-educated B cells promote renal cancer metastasis via inducing the IL-1β/HIF-2α/Notch1 signals. Cell Death Dis 13:415. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-022-04878-7
Haddad JJ, Land SC (2001) A non-hypoxic, ROS-sensitive pathway mediates TNF-α-dependent regulation of HIF-1α. FEBS Lett 505:269–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-5793(01)02833-2
Malkov MI, Lee CT, Taylor CT (2021) Regulation of the Hypoxia-Inducible Factor (HIF) by pro-inflammatory cytokines. Cells 10:2340. https://doi.org/10.3390/CELLS10092340
Kim KW, Lee SJ, Kim JC (2017) TNF-α upregulates HIF-1α expression in pterygium fibroblasts and enhances their susceptibility to VEGF independent of hypoxia. Exp Eye Res 164:74–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EXER.2017.08.008
DiGiacomo JW, Gilkes DM (2019) Therapeutic strategies to block the hypoxic response. Adv Exp Med Biol 1136:141–157. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12734-3_10/TABLES/1
Kung AL, Zabludoff SD, France DS et al (2004) Small molecule blockade of transcriptional coactivation of the hypoxia-inducible factor pathway. Cancer Cell 6:33–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2004.06.009
Min S, Wang X, Du Q et al (2020) Chetomin, a Hsp90/HIF1α pathway inhibitor, effectively targets lung cancer stem cells and non-stem cells. Cancer Biol Ther 21:698–708. https://doi.org/10.1080/15384047.2020.1763147
Parhira S, Zhu GY, Chen M et al (2016) Cardenolides from Calotropis gigantea as potent inhibitors of hypoxia-inducible factor-1 transcriptional activity. J Ethnopharmacol 194:930–936. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JEP.2016.10.070
Zheng Z, Zhou Z, Zhang Q et al (2021) Non-classical cardenolides from Calotropis gigantea exhibit anticancer effect as HIF-1 inhibitors. Bioorg Chem 109:104740. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BIOORG.2021.104740
Xue Z, Li H, Xie W et al (2022) Benzo [d] isoxazole Derivatives as Hypoxia-Inducible Factor (HIF)-1α Inhibitors. ACS Med Chem Lett 13:1864–1869. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsmedchemlett.2c00308
Greenberger LM, Horak ID, Filpula D et al (2008) A RNA antagonist of hypoxia-inducible factor-1α, EZN-2968, inhibits tumor cell growth. Mol Cancer Ther 7:3598–3608. https://doi.org/10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-08-0510
Patnaik A, Chiorean EG, Tolcher A, et al (2009) EZN-2968, a novel hypoxia-inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α) messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) antagonist: Results of a phase I, pharmacokinetic (PK), dose-escalation study of daily administration in patients (pts) with advanced malignancies. J Clin Oncol 27:. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2009.27.15_suppl.2564
Jeong W, Rapisarda A, Park SR, et al (2014) Pilot trial of EZN-2968, an antisense oligonucleotide inhibitor of hypoxia-inducible factor-1 alpha (HIF-1α), in patients with refractory solid tumors. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 73:. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-013-2362-z
Wu J, Contratto M, Shanbhogue KP et al (2019) Evaluation of a locked nucleic acid form of antisense oligo targeting HIF-1α in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Clin Oncol 10:149. https://doi.org/10.5306/WJCO.V10.I3.149
Huang L, Zhang Z, Zhang S et al (2011) Inhibitory action of Celastrol on hypoxia-mediated angiogenesis and metastasis via the HIF-1α pathway. Int J Mol Med 27:407–415. https://doi.org/10.3892/ijmm.2011.600
Ma J, Han LZ, Liang H, et al (2014) Celastrol inhibits the HIF-1α pathway by inhibition of mTOR/p70S6K/eIF4E and ERK1/2 phosphorylation in human hepatoma cells. Oncol Rep 32:. https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2014.3211
Shang FF, Wang JY, Xu Q et al (2021) Design, synthesis of novel celastrol derivatives and study on their antitumor growth through HIF-1α pathway. Eur J Med Chem 220:113474. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EJMECH.2021.113474
Zhou YX, Huang YL (2009) Antiangiogenic effect of celastrol on the growth of human glioma: An in vitro and in vivo study. Chin Med J 122:. https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0366-6999.2009.14.012
Zhang C juan, Zhu N, Long J, et al (2021) Celastrol induces lipophagy via the LXRα/ABCA1 pathway in clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Acta Pharmacol Sin 42:. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41401-020-00572-6
Zhang CJ, Zhu N, Wang YX, et al (2021) Celastrol attenuates lipid accumulation and stemness of clear cell renal cell carcinoma via CAV-1/LOX-1 pathway. Front Pharmacol 12:. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2021.658092
Hsiang YH, Hertzberg R, Hecht S, Liu LF (1985) Camptothecin induces protein-linked DNA breaks via mammalian DNA topoisomerase I. J Biol Chem 260:14873–14878. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0021-9258(17)38654-4
Rapisarda A, Uranchimeg B, Scudiero DA et al (2002) Identification of small molecule inhibitors of hypoxia-inducible factor 1 transcriptional activation pathway. Cancer Res 62:4316–4324
Rapisarda A, Uranchimeg B, Sordet O et al (2004) Topoisomerase I-mediated inhibition of hypoxia-inducible factor 1: mechanism and therapeutic implications. Cancer Res 64:1475–1482. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-03-3139
Sapra P, Kraft P, Pastorino F, et al (2011) Potent and sustained inhibition of HIF-1α and downstream genes by a polyethyleneglycol-SN38 conjugate, EZN-2208, results in anti-angiogenic effects. Angiogenesis 14:. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10456-011-9209-1
Valsecchi R, Coltella N, Magliulo D et al (2020) EZN-2208 treatment suppresses chronic lymphocytic leukaemia by interfering with environmental protection and increases response to fludarabine. Open Biol 10:190262. https://doi.org/10.1098/RSOB.190262
Osborne CRC, O’Shaughnessy J, Holmes FA, et al (2012) Final analysis of phase II study of EZN-2208 (PEG-SN38) in metastatic breast cancer (MBC). J Clin Oncol 30:. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2012.30.15_suppl.1017
Garrett CR, Bekaii-Saab TS, Ryan T, et al (2013) Randomized phase 2 study of pegylated SN-38 (EZN-2208) or irinotecan plus cetuximab in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. Cancer 119:. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.28358
Pham E, Birrer MJ, Eliasof S et al (2015) Translational impact of nanoparticle-drug conjugate CRLX101 with or without bevacizumab in advanced ovarian cancer. Clin Cancer Res 21:808–818. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-2810
Krasner CN, Campos SM, Young CL et al (2021) Sequential Phase II clinical trials evaluating CRLX101 as monotherapy and in combination with bevacizumab in recurrent ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 162:661–666. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.YGYNO.2021.07.002
Kong D, Park EJ, Stephen AG et al (2005) Echinomycin, a small-molecule inhibitor of hypoxia-inducible factor-1 DNA-binding activity. Cancer Res 65:9047–9055. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-1235
Bailey CM, Liu Y, Peng G et al (2020) Liposomal formulation of HIF-1α inhibitor echinomycin eliminates established metastases of triple-negative breast cancer. Nanomedicine 29:102278. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.NANO.2020.102278
Shirai Y, Chow CCT, Kambe G et al (2021) An overview of the recent development of anticancer agents targeting the HIF-1 transcription factor. Cancers (Basel) 13:2813. https://doi.org/10.3390/CANCERS13112813
Tanaka T, Yamaguchis J, Shojis K, Nangakus M (2012) Anthracycline inhibits recruitment of hypoxia-inducible transcription factors and suppresses tumor cell migration and cardiac angiogenic response in the host. J Biol Chem 287:34866–34882. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M112.374587
Pang Y, Yang C, Schovanek J, et al (2017) Anthracyclines suppress pheochromocytoma cell characteristics, including metastasis, through inhibition of the hypoxia signaling pathway. Oncotarget 8:. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.16224
Yang Y, Qian DZ, Rey S, et al (2022) Daily administration of low-dose daunorubicin or doxorubicin inhibits hypoxia-inducible factor 1 and tumor vascularization. bioRxiv 2022.06. https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.06.15.492526
Ge Y, Yoon SH, Jang H et al (2020) Decursin promotes HIF-1α proteasomal degradation and immune responses in hypoxic tumour microenvironment. Phytomedicine 78:153318. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PHYMED.2020.153318
Salman S, Meyers DJ, Wicks EE, et al (2022) HIF inhibitor 32–134D eradicates murine hepatocellular carcinoma in combination with anti-PD1 therapy. J Clin Invest 132:. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI156774
Joe NS, Wang Y, Oza HH et al (2023) Mebendazole treatment disrupts the transcriptional activity of hypoxia-inducible factors 1 and 2 in breast cancer cells. Cancers 15:1330. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15041330
Wallace EM, Rizzi JP, Han G et al (2016) A small-molecule antagonist of HIF2α is efficacious in preclinical models of renal cell carcinoma. Cancer Res 76:5491–5500. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-0473
Xu R, Wang K, Rizzi JP et al (2019) 3-[(1 S, 2 S, 3 R)-2, 3-Difluoro-1-hydroxy-7-methylsulfonylindan-4-yl] oxy-5-fluorobenzonitrile (PT2977), a hypoxia-inducible factor 2α (HIF-2α) inhibitor for the treatment of clear cell Renal cell carcinoma. J Med Chem 62:6876–6893. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.9b00719
Courtney KD, Infante JR, Lam ET et al (2018) Phase I dose-escalation trial of PT2385, a first-in-class hypoxia-inducible factor-2α antagonist in patients with previously treated advanced clear cell renal cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 36:867. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2017.74.2627
Papadopoulos KP, Jonasch E, Zojwalla NJ et al (2018) A first-in-human phase 1 dose-escalation trial of the oral HIF-2a inhibitor PT2977 in patients with advanced solid tumors. J Clin Oncol 36:2508. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2018.36.15_SUPPL.2508
Jonasch E, Iliopoulos O, Rathmell WK et al (2022) LITESPARK-004 (MK-6482-004) phase 2 study of belzutifan, an oral hypoxia-inducible factor 2α inhibitor (HIF-2α), for von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) disease: Update with more than two years of follow-up data. J Clin Oncol 40:4546. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2022.40.16_SUPPL.4546
Srinivasan R, Iliopoulos O, Rathmell WK, et al (2022) LBA69 Belzutifan, a HIF-2α Inhibitor, for von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) disease-associated neoplasms: 36 months of follow-up of the phase II LITESPARK-004 study. Ann Oncol 33:. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2022.08.074
Albiges L, Rini BI, Peltola K, et al (2023) LBA88 Belzutifan versus everolimus in participants (pts) with previously treated advanced clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC): Randomized open-label phase III LITESPARK-005 study. Ann Oncol 34:. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2023.10.090
Fallah J, Brave MH, Weinstock C et al (2022) FDA approval summary: belzutifan for von Hippel-Lindau disease–associated tumors. Clin Cancer Res 28:4843–4848. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-22-1054
Yan Y, He M, Zhao L et al (2022) A novel HIF-2α targeted inhibitor suppresses hypoxia-induced breast cancer stemness via SOD2-mtROS-PDI/GPR78-UPRER axis. Cell Death Differ 29:1769–1789. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41418-022-00963-
Lawson KV, Sivick Gauthier KE, Piovesan D et al (2022) 46P AB521, a clinical-stage, potent, and selective Hypoxia-Inducible Factor (HIF)-2α inhibitor, for the treatment of renal cell carcinoma. Ann Oncol 33:S21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2022.01.055
Choueiri TK, Garmezy B, Paterson E, et al (2023) ARC-20: A phase 1 dose-escalation and dose-expansion study to investigate the safety, tolerability, and pharmacology of HIF-2α inhibitor AB521 monotherapy in patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma and other solid tumors. J Clin Oncol 41:TPS4602. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2023.41.16_SUPPL.TPS4602
Oza HH, Gilkes DM (2024) Multiplex immunofluorescence staining protocol for the dual imaging of hypoxia-inducible factors 1 and 2 on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples. In: Hypoxia: Methods and Protocols. pp 167–178
Cowman SJ, Koh MY (2022) Revisiting the HIF switch in the tumor and its immune microenvironment. Trends Cancer 8:28–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trecan.2021.10.004
Farooq M, Bhat GhR, Besina S, et al (2023) Expression of HIF-1α and markers of angiogenesis and metabolic adaptation in molecular subtypes of breast cancer. Transl Med Commun 8:. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41231-023-00135-x
Kopecka J, Salaroglio IC, Perez-Ruiz E et al (2021) Hypoxia as a driver of resistance to immunotherapy. Drug Resist Updates 59:100787. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drup.2021.100787
Bailey CM, Liu Y, Liu M, et al (2022) Targeting HIF-1α abrogates PD-L1–mediated immune evasion in tumor microenvironment but promotes tolerance in normal tissues. J Clin Investigat 132:. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI150846
Shurin MR, Umansky V (2022) Cross-talk between HIF and PD-1/PD-L1 pathways in carcinogenesis and therapy. J Clin Investigat 132:. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI159473
Luo F, Lu FT, Cao JX et al (2022) HIF-1α inhibition promotes the efficacy of immune checkpoint blockade in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer Lett 531:39–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canlet.2022.01.027
Choueiri TK, Bedke J, Karam JA, et al (2023) Phase 3 LITESPARK-022: Pembrolizumab (pembro) plus hypoxia-inducible factor 2α (HIF-2α) inhibitor belzutifan as adjuvant treatment for clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). J Clin Oncol 41:. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2023.41.6_suppl.tps748
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to acknowledge members in the field whose work was summarized here and those for which we were unable to include due to space constraints.
Funding
Work in the Gilkes lab is supported by the JKTG Foundation and the National Cancer Institute.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest
The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
All authors consent to publication and have read the final version of this manuscript.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Shi, Y., Gilkes, D.M. HIF-1 and HIF-2 in cancer: structure, regulation, and therapeutic prospects. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 82, 44 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-024-05537-0
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-024-05537-0