Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to link.springer.com

Skip to main content
Log in

Tracing the restructuring and industrialisation of upland agriculture in Southwest China, 2008 – 2019

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Food Security Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The upland agriculture in Southwest China is undergoing a transformation from subsistence to industrial agriculture, which is accompanied by differentiation among farmers. The industrialisation of farming is best understood as an ongoing process rather than an achieved structure, and the industrial and subsistence forms of production are combined in complex ways during transformation. The unit of analysis shifts downwards to the production unit, namely, the ‘form of production’, which is observed at the household level. This study aims to describe the dynamics of the transformation from subsistence to industrial agriculture in Southwest China and the hybridized forms of production that lie between the two extremes. Empirical observations on the transformation of farming in Southwest China, specifically the circumstances of smallholder farmers and local farming systems in the process of industrialisation and farmers’ reasons for their resistance and persistence in traditional farming, are documented and analysed. Using data collected for 2008 and 2019, this study considers the form of production observed from production methods and dynamic farming structures to explore how farmers’ motivations and structural forces clash and interact at the farm level in the commoditization of production and to understand farmers’ autonomy within relational contexts. The study measures the resilience of farmers’ decision-making in production through their space for manoeuvring, which depends on their ability and the conditions to obtain alternative solutions at various stages of production, reflecting varying degrees of autonomy from the dominant development trajectory. The study also reveals that the rapid reduction in the cultivated area of cereals is closely related to the acceleration of agricultural industrialisation. Farmers who join the industry are systematically pressured to compete with no economic cushion when vertically organized commodity chains have shaped local production. Their forms of production are interlocked through adjacent land and crops, and the widespread domino effect has reduced farmers’ room to manoeuvre, limited farmers’ choices in production, and brought vulnerability to local farming systems. Moreover, the transformation towards sustainability has been fragmented and inconsistent.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+
from £29.99 /Month
  • Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
  • Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
  • Cancel anytime
View plans

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data will be made available upon reasonable request.

Notes

  1. The first, second, third, and fourth digits in the farmer’s code from left to right represent the county, township, village, and household codes, respectively. The county code is 1–6 (corresponding to County A, B, C, D, E, F), and the township, village, and household codes are all 1–3 (some households code up to 4). The questionnaire code for 2009 is distinguished from 2019 by a ‘C’ before the four digits.

  2. 100 RMB, approximately 13.97 USD.

  3. One mu is approximately equal to 667 square metres or one-fifteenth of a hectare.

References

  • Altieri, M., & Toledo, V. M. (2011). The agroecological revolution in Latin America: Rescuing nature, ensuring food sovereignty and empowering peasants. Journal of Peasant Studies, 38(3), 587–612. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2011.582947

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderman, T. L., Remans, R., Wood, S. A., DeRosa, K., & DeFries, R. S. (2014). Synergies and tradeoffs between cash crop production and food security: A case study in rural Ghana. Food Security, 6, 541–554. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-014-0360-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkins, P., & Bowler, I. (2001). Food in society: Economy, culture, geography. Hodder Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barkin, D., & Barón, L. (2005). Constructing alternatives to globalisation: Strengthening tradition through innovation. Development in Practice, 15(2), 175–185. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4030078. Accessed 25 Mar 2025

  • Barkin, D., & Lemus, B. (2014). Rethinking the social and solidarity society in Light of community practice. Sustainability, 6(9), 6432–6445. https://doi.org/10.3390/su6096432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, H. (2016). Agrarian political economy and modern world capitalism: The contributions of food regime analysis. Journal of Peasant Studies, 43(3), 611–647. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2015.1101456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Böhm, S., Dinerstein, A. C., & Spicer, A. (2010). (Im) possibilities of autonomy: Social movements in and beyond capital, the state and development. Social Movement Studies, 9(1), 17–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742830903442485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonanno, A. (2014). The legitimation crisis of neoliberal globalization: Instances from agriculture and food. In S. A. Wolf & A. Bonanno (Eds.), The neoliberal regime in the agri-food sector: Crisis, resilience, and restructuring (pp. 13–31). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bookchin, M. (1995). Social anarchism or lifestyle anarchism: An unbridgeable chasm. AK Press.

  • Bowler, I. (1992). The geography of agriculture in developed market economies. Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campling, L., & Lerche, J. (2016). Introduction to the special issue the political economy of agrarian change: Essays in appreciation of henry Bernstein. Journal of Agrarian Change, 16(3):365–369. https://doi.org/10.1111/joac.12180

  • Carolan, M. (2012). The sociology of food and agriculture. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chappell, M. J., & LaValle, L. A. (2011). Food security and biodiversity: Can we have both? An agroecological analysis. Agriculture and Human Values, 28, 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-009-9251-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, M., Li, Y., Tang, F., Xu, Q., Yu, M., Zhang, H., & Li, X. (2023). Transformation of paddy field use in intermountain-type basins using evidence from the structure and function perspective of karst mountain areas in Southwest China. Agronomy, 13(6), 1552. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13061552

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clapp, J., & Fuchs, D. (2009). Agrifood corporations, global governance, and sustainability: A framework for analysis. In J. Clapp & D. Fuchs (Eds.), Corporate power in global agrifood governance (pp. 1–25). MIT Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dreze, J., & Sen, A. (1989). Hunger and public action. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, C. (1996). The centrality of agriculture. McGill-Queen’s University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Flynn, A., Chan, K. W., Zhu, Z. H., & Yu, L. (2017). Sustainability, space and supply chains: The role of bamboo in Anji County, China. Journal of Rural Studies, 49, 128–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.11.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folke, C. (2006). Resilience: The emergence of a perspective for social-ecological systems analyses. Global Environmental Change, 16, 253–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foster, J. B. (2000). Marx’s ecology. Materialism and nature. Monthly Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedmann, H. (1980). Household production and the national economy: Concepts for the analysis of agrarian formations. Journal of Peasant Studies, 7(2), 158–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066158008438099

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garnett, T., & Godfray, C. (2012). Food climate research network and the oxford martin programme on the future of food. In T. Garnett & C. Godfray (Eds.), Sustainable intensification in agriculture: Navigating a course through competing food system priorities. University of Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giller, K. E., Delaune, T., Silva, J. V., Descheemaeker, K., van de Ven, G., Schut, A. G. T., van Wijk, M., Hammond, J., Hochman, Z., Chikowo, R., Narayanan, S., Kishore, A., Bresciani, F., Andersson, J. A., & van Ittersum, M. K. (2021). (2021) The future of farming: Who will produce our food? Food Security, 13, 1073–1099. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-021-01184-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, D., & Redclift, M. (1991). Refashioning nature: Food, ecology and culture. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, D., B. Sorj, & J. Wilkinson. (1987). From farming to biotechnology: A theory of agro-industrial development. Blackwell.

  • Goodman, D., & Watts, M. (1994). Reconfiguring the rural or fording the divide? Capitalist restructuring and the global agro-food system. Journal of Peasant Studies, 22, 1–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guptill, A.E., Copelton, D.A., & Lucal, B. (2013). Food and society: Principles and paradoxes. Polity.

  • Harris, O. (1981). Households as natural units. In K. Young, C. Wolkowitz, & R. McCullagh (Eds.), Of marriage and the market: Women’s subordination internationally and its lessons (pp. 136–155). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (2017). ‘Listen, anarchist!’ A personal response to Simon springer’s why a radical geography must be anarchist. Dialogues in Human Geography, 7(3), 233–250. https://doi.org/10.1177/2043820617732876

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ilbery, B., & Bowler, I. (1998). From agricultural productivism to post-productivism. In B. Ilbery (Ed.), The geography of rural change (pp. 57–84). Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isakson, S. R. (2015). Derivatives for development? Small farmer vulnerabilities and the finacialization of climate risk management. Journal of Agrarian Change, 15(4), 580–599. https://doi.org/10.1111/joac.12124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jansen, K., Vicol, M., & Nikol, L. (2022). Autonomy and repeasantization: Conceptual, analytical, and methodological problems. Journal of Agrarian Change, 22, 489–505. https://doi.org/10.1111/joac.12468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lang, T., & Heasman, M. (2004). Food Wars: The Global Battle for Mouths, Minds and Markets. Earthscan.

  • Levidow, L. (2015). European transitions towards a corporate-environmental food regime: Agroecological incorporation or contestation? Journal of Rural Studies, 40, 76–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.06.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, J., Lammerts van Bueren, E. T., Jiggins, J., & Leeuwis, C. (2012). Farmers’ adoption of maize (Zea mays L.) hybrids and the persistence of landraces in Southwest China: Implications for policy and breeding. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 59, 1147–1160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-011-9750-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, X., Du, M., Lei, H., Pan, H., Shang, C., Feng, K., & Wang, W. (2023). Distribution characteristics of drought resistance and disaster reduction capability and the identification of key factors—a case study of a typical area in the Yun-Gui Plateau, China. Sustainability, 15(20), 15148. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152015148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mann, S., & Dickinson, J. (1978). Obstacles to the development of a capitalist agriculture. Journal of Peasant Studies, 5, 466–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsden, T. (2012). Food systems under pressure: Regulatory instabilities and the challenge of sustainable development. In G. Spaargaren, P. Oosterveer, & A. Loeber (Eds.), Food practices in transition: Changing food consumption, retail and production in the age of reflexive modernity (pp. 291–311). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsden, T., Moragues Faus, A., & Sonnino, R. (2019). Reproducing vulnerabilities in agri-food systems: Tracing the links between governance, financialization, and vulnerability in Europe post 2007–2008. Journal of Agrarian Change, 19, 82–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/joac.12267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newby, H. (1987). Emergent issuesw in theories of agrarian development. In D. Thorniley (Ed.), Economics and sociology of rural communities (pp. 7–22). GeoBooks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, D. M., Zheng, Y., Naylor, L. A., Murtagh, M., Waldron, S., & Peng, T. (2020). How does smallholder farming practice and environmental awareness vary across village communities in the karst terrain of Southwest China? Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 288, 106715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2019.106715

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng, J., Xu, Y. Q., Cai, Y. L., & Xiao, H. L. (2011). The role of policies in land use/cover change since the 1970s in ecologically fragile karst areas of Southwest China: A case study on the Maotiaohe watershed. Environmental Science and Policy, 14(4), 408–418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2011.03.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, P. (2008). The end of food: The coming crisis in the world food industry. Bloomsbury.

  • Sage, C. (2012). Environment and food. Routledge. 

  • Sen, A. (1981). Poverty and famine. Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, M. (2015). The political ecology of climate change adaptation: Livelihoods, agrarian change and the conflicts of development. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilzey, M. (2017). Reintegrating economy, society, and environment for cooperative futures: Polanyi, Marx, and food sovereignty. Journal of Rural Studies, 53, 317–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.12.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torras, J. (1989). La ‘protoindustrialización’: Balance de una peripecia historiográfica. Revista Internacional De Ciencias Sociales, 10, 83–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vandergeest, P. (1988). Commercialization and commoditization: A dialogue between perspectives. Sociologia Ruralis, 28(1), 7–29. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9523.1988.tb00329.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Ploeg, J.D. (2008). The new peasantries: Struggles for autonomy and sustainability in an era of empire and globalization. Earthscan.

  • van der Ploeg, J. D. (2010). The peasantries of the twenty-first century: The commoditisation debate revisited. Journal of Peasant Studies, 37(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150903498721

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vergara-Camus, L., & Jansen, K. (2022). Autonomy in agrarian studies, politics, and movements: An inter-paradigm debate. Journal of Agrarian Change, 22, 455–472. https://doi.org/10.1111/joac.12500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vergara-Camus, L. (2014). Land and freedom: The MST, the Zapatistas and peasant alternatives to neoliberalism. Zed Books.

  • Wiskerke, J. S. C. (2009). On places lost and places regained: Reflections on the alternative food geography and sustainable regional development. International Planning Studies, 14(4), 369–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, R., & Loopmans, M. (2023). Land dispossession, rural gentrification and displacement: Blurring the rural-urban boundary in Chengdu, China. Journal of Rural Studies, 97, 22–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2022.11.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, E. M. (2012). Food and development. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zacarés, J. M. (2018). Beyond market dependence: The origins of capitalism in Catalonia. Journal of Agrarian Change, 18, 749–767. https://doi.org/10.1111/joac.12263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Q., Sun, Z., Wu, F., & Deng, X. (2016). Understanding rural restructuring in China: The impact of changes in labor and capital productivity on domestic agricultural production and trade. Journal of Rural Studies, 47, 552–562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.05.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I am especially grateful to Dr. Shu Zhang for his assistance in data illustration. I would also like to thank three anonymous reviewers for comments on earlier versions of this paper.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Social Science Fund of China under Grant 22BSH156.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jingsong Li.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author would like to acknowledge that this work is an expansion of the author’s previous work first reported briefly in Chinese in the Open Times [the full reference is: Li, J. (2023). Evolution and Persistence: The Transformation of Upland Agriculture in Southwest China. Open Times, 1, 172–188]. 

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 16 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, J. Tracing the restructuring and industrialisation of upland agriculture in Southwest China, 2008 – 2019. Food Sec. 17, 603–623 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-025-01534-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-025-01534-8

Keywords