Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to link.springer.com

Skip to main content

Heidegger and Kant, or Heidegger’s Poetic Idealism of Imagination

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of German Idealism and Existentialism

Part of the book series: Palgrave Handbooks in German Idealism ((PHGI))

  • 713 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter I argue that there is a form of existentialism in Heidegger that is closely linked to his reading of Kant. More precisely, I argue that “Heidegger’s existentialism,” like existentialism in general, is a specific variety of idealism and, in Heidegger’s case at least, with decidedly but unacknowledged tendencies towards subjectivism or constructivism. This assessment which I share with other exegetes is particularly well supported by Heidegger’s interpretation of Kant, both in relation to Heidegger’s early thesis on the temporality of subjectivity and in relation to the later thesis on objectivity as a possible but contingent figuration of the history of being.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+
from £29.99 /Month
  • Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
  • Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
  • Cancel anytime
View plans

Buy Now

Chapter
GBP 19.95
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
GBP 127.50
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
GBP 159.99
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
GBP 159.99
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    For concise reconstruction of “Heidegger’s existentialism” see Blattner 2012.

  2. 2.

    For a more precise reconstruction of the first phase, see Römer 2018, pp. 333–347.

  3. 3.

    As Adrian Moore points out, just as in Derrida’s “deconstructive project” that follows Heidegger on this point, “for Heidegger the repudiation of traditional metaphysics involved appropriating traditional metaphysical concepts and traditional metaphysical methods. It was not, in other words, a simple matter of turning one’s back on the tradition. It was a matter of using the tradition’s own resources to subvert it from within” (Moore 2012, pp. 528–529).

  4. 4.

    “And if the being of Dasein is completely grounded in temporality, temporality must make possible being-in-the-world und thus the transcendence of Dasein” (Heidegger 1975, vol. 2, p. 481, 2010a, p. 346).

  5. 5.

    Cf. Kant’s Critique of Practical Reason: “Thus the moral law has no cognitive faculty other than the understanding (not the imagination)” (Kant 1996, p. 169 (5: 69)).

  6. 6.

    I discuss this in a forthcoming text, cf. Espinet 2020.

Bibliography

  • Blattner, William. 1999. Heidegger’s Temporal Idealism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2012. Heidegger: The Existential Analytic of Dasein. In The Cambridge Companion to Existentialism, ed. Steven Crowell, 158–177. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Carman, Taylor. 2003. Heidegger’s Analytic: Interpretation, Discourse, and Authenticity in Being and Time. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Crowell, Steven. 2012. Existentialism and its Legacy. In The Cambridge Companion to Existentialism, ed. Steven Crowell, 3–24. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, W. Bret. 2007. Heidegger and the Will. On the Way to Gelassenheit. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dreyfus, Hubert. 1991. Being-in-the-World: A Commentary on Heidegger’s Being and Time, Division I. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Espinet, David. 2018. Heidegger lecteur de Kant. Points de vues prives et publics à partir de 1930. Archives de Philosophie 81 (2): 353–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2020. Quand se taire c’est faire. L’écoute heideggérienne et l’o(n)to-polémologie du silence. In Heidegger aujourd’hui. Actualité et postérité de la pensée de l’Ereignis, ed. Sophie-Jan Arrien and Christian Sommer. Paris: Hermann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabriel, Markus. 2014. Is Heidegger’s ‘Turn’ a Realist Project? Meta. Research in Hermeneutics, Phenomenology, and Practical Philosophy, Special Issue: 44–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2015. Fields of Sense. A New Realist Ontology. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Han-Pile, Béatrice. 2005. Early Heidegger’s Appropriation of Kant. In A Companion to Heidegger, ed. Hubert Dreyfus and Mark Wrathall, 80–101. Malden: Blackwell.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, Martin. 1975. Gesamtausgabe. Vol. 1–102. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1982. On the Way to Language. Trans. Peter Hertz. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1991. The Principle of Reason. Trans. Reginald Lilly. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1993. Letter on ‘Humanism’. In Basic Writings. Revised and extended edition David. F. Krell, 213–265. New York: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1997a. Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics. Trans. Richard Taft. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1997b. Phenomenological Interpretation of Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason. Trans. Parvis Emad and Kenneth Maly. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2000. Towards the Definition of Philosophy: 1. The Idea of Philosophy and the Problem of Worldview; 2. Phenomenology and Transcendental Philosophy of Value. Trans. Ted Sadler. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2002. The Essence of Human Freedom: An Introduction to Philosophy. Trans. Ted Sadler. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2010a. Being and Time. Trans. Joan Stambaugh and Rev. Dennis J. Schmidt. Albany: State of New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2010b. Country Path Conversation.Trans. Bret W. Davis. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2012. Contributions to Philosophy (Of the Event). Trans. Richard Rojcewicz and Daniela Vallega-Neu. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2017. Ponderings VII–IX. Black Notebooks 1983–1939. Trans. Richard Rojcewicz. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2018. The Question Concerning the Thing: On Kant’s Doctrine of the Transcendental Principles. Trans. James D. Reid and Benjamin D. Crowe. London: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, Immanuel. 1996. Kant’s Practical Philosophy. Ed. and Trans. Mary Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2007. Critique of Pure Reason. Ed. and Trans. Paul Guyer and Allen Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korsgaard, Christine. 1996. The Sources of Normativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, Adrian. 2012. The Evolution of Modern Metaphysics: Making Sense of Things. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Römer, Inga. 2018. Les interpretations heideggeriennes de Kant. Archives de Philosophie 81 (2): 329–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sommer, Christian. 2017. Mythologie de l’événement. Heidegger avec Hölderlin. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Zarader, Marlene. 2006. The Unthought Debt: Heidegger and the Hebraic Heritage. Trans. Bettina Bergo. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Espinet .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Espinet, D. (2020). Heidegger and Kant, or Heidegger’s Poetic Idealism of Imagination. In: Stewart, J. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of German Idealism and Existentialism. Palgrave Handbooks in German Idealism. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44571-3_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics