Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to link.springer.com

Skip to main content

Statistical Evaluation of Machine Learning for Vibration Data

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Data Science in Engineering Vol. 10 (IMAC 2024)

Included in the following conference series:

  • 265 Accesses

  • 1 Citation

Abstract

Research in machine learning (ML) for structural health monitoring (SHM) has increased in recent years due to ML’s potential to extract information from large quantities of data collected under varying conditions to make predictions, such as detection, identification, and characterization. Current ML implementation consists of training a model for narrow, task-specific needs, such as training a neural network to detect the presence of structural faults. However, advancements in ML and artificial intelligence (AI) have contributed foundation models—large models trained on broad data in a self-supervised fashion that can be quickly fine-tuned to accomplish specific downstream tasks different from the task it was trained on. For example, a foundation model that is trained for damage detection may be prompted to perform identification and characterization tasks given future data. Because the training and tasking of foundation models are inherently different from current ML implementation, metrics that capture performance while also considering these differences are needed for fair evaluation and comparison between approaches. This research focuses on the testing, evaluation, and benchmarking for foundation models trained on vibration data from ground sensors. We will present metrics that incorporate a broad series of tasks to quantify the performance of foundation models against other traditional ML models. Since the ground vibration data is employed to train and test foundation models for seismic events, the tasks of these models are well aligned with SHM: detecting, identifying, and characterizing acceleration signals or images. The comprehensive evaluation approach and metrics we present will be a step toward holistically quantifying advanced ML/AI success as it inevitably permeates the field of SHM.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+
from £29.99 /Month
  • Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
  • Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
  • Cancel anytime
View plans

Buy Now

Chapter
GBP 19.95
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
GBP 109.99
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
GBP 139.99
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bommasani, R., Hudson, D.A., Adeli, E., et al.: On the opportunities and risks of foundation models (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Mousavi, S.M., Beroza, G.C.: Deep-learning seismology. Science 377(6607), eabm4470 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Flah, M., Nunez, I., Ben Chaabene, W., Nehdi, M.L.: Machine learning algorithms in civil structural health monitoring: a systematic review. Arch. Comput. Methods Eng. 28(4), 2621–2643 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Avci, O., Abdeljaber, O., Kiranyaz, S., Hussein, M., Gabbouj, M., Inman, D.J.: A review of vibration-based damage detection in civil structures: from traditional methods to machine learning and deep learning applications. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 147, 107077 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Harsuko, R., Alkhalifah, T.A.: Storseismic: a new paradigm in deep learning for seismic processing. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 60, 1–15 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Arrowsmith, S.J., Trugman, D.T., MacCarthy, J., Bergen, K.J., Lumley, D., Magnani, M.B.: Big data seismology. Rev. Geophys. 60(2), e2021RG000769 (2022). e2021RG000769 2021RG000769

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cano, E.V., Akram, J., Peter, D.B.: Automatic seismic phase picking based on unsupervised machine-learning classification and content information analysis. Geophysics 86(4), V299–V315 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Fu, J., Wang, X., Li, Z., Meng, H., Wang, J., Wang, W., Tang, C.: Automatic phase-picking method for detecting earthquakes based on the signal-to-noise-ratio concept. Seismol. Res. Lett. 91(1), 334–342 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Münchmeyer, J., Woollam, J., Rietbrock, A., Tilmann, F., Lange, D., Bornstein, T., Diehl, T., Giunchi, C., Haslinger, F., Jozinović, D., Michelini, A., Saul, J., Soto, H.: Which picker fits my data? A quantitative evaluation of deep learning based seismic pickers. J. Geophys. Res.: Solid Earth 127(1), e2021JB023499 (2022). e2021JB023499 2021JB023499

    Google Scholar 

  10. Woollam, J., Münchmeyer, J., Tilmann, F., Rietbrock, A., Lange, D., Bornstein, T., Diehl, T., Giunchi, C., Haslinger, F., Jozinović, D., Michelini, A., Saul, J., Soto, H.: SeisBench—a toolbox for machine learning in seismology. Seismol. Res. Lett. 93(3), 1695–1709 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Mousavi, S.M., Sheng, Y., Zhu, W., Beroza, G.C.: Stanford earthquake dataset (stead): a global data set of seismic signals for AI. IEEE Access 7, 179464–179476 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Michelini, A., Cianetti, S., Gaviano, S., Giunchi, C., Jozinović, D., Lauciani, V.: Instance – the italian seismic dataset for machine learning. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 13(12), 5509–5544 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhu, W., Beroza, G.C.: PhaseNet: a deep-neural-network-based seismic arrival-time picking method. Geophys. J. Int. 216(1), 261–273 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ronneberger, O., Fischer, P., Brox, T.: U-net: convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. In: Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention (MICCAI), vol. 9351. LNCS, pp. 234–241. Springer, Berlin (2015). Available on arXiv:1505.04597 [cs.CV]

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kim, A., Nakamura, Y., Yukutake, Y., Uematsu, H., Abe, Y.: Development of a high-performance seismic phase picker using deep learning in the hakone volcanic area. Earth Planets Space 75(1), 85 (2023)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bornstein, T., Lange, D., Münchmeyer, J., Woollam, J., Rietbrock, A., Barcheck, G., Grevemeyer, I., Tilmann, F.: Pickblue: seismic phase picking for ocean bottom seismometers with deep learning (2023)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Paszke, A., Gross, S., Massa, F., Lerer, A., Bradbury, J., Chanan, G., Killeen, T., Lin, Z., Gimelshein, N., Antiga, L., Desmaison, A., Kopf, A., Yang, E., DeVito, Z., Raison, M., Tejani, A., Chilamkurthy, S., Steiner, B., Fang, L., Bai, J., Chintala, S.: Pytorch: an imperative style, high-performance deep learning library. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 32, pp. 8024–8035. Curran Associates, Inc., Red Hook (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kingma, D.P., Ba, J.: Adam: a method for stochastic optimization (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Shao, C., Feng, Y.: Overcoming catastrophic forgetting beyond continual learning: balanced training for neural machine translation (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Dawid, A.P., Sebastiani, P.: Coherent dispersion criteria for optimal experimental design. Ann. Stat. 27(1), 65–81 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Gneiting, T., Raftery, A.E.: Strictly proper scoring rules, prediction, and estimation. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 102(477), 359–378 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the US Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration’s Office of Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation Research and Development (NA-22) for supporting this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Samuel Myren .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2025 The Society for Experimental Mechanics, Inc.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Myren, S., Parikh, N., Flynn, G., Higdon, D., Casleton, E. (2025). Statistical Evaluation of Machine Learning for Vibration Data. In: Matarazzo, T., Hemez, F., Tronci, E.M., Downey, A. (eds) Data Science in Engineering Vol. 10. IMAC 2024. Conference Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-68142-4_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-68142-4_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-68141-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-68142-4

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Keywords

Publish with us

Policies and ethics