Thanks to visit codestin.com
Credit goes to link.springer.com

Skip to main content

Comparing Competing Approaches to Crowdsourced Classifications of Biological Species

Work in progress

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Information Systems (EMCIS 2024)

Abstract

The world’s ecosystems are undergoing rapid changes driven by climate change and human development, leading to accelerated habitat loss. These combined processes have already resulted in extinction and decline in many species population, threatening the sustainability of multiple ecosystems, and, ultimately, the survival of all life on earth, including human life. Facing this biodiversity crisis, scientists and nature conservation organizations lack important data regarding the state of the populations of most species on the planet, with only a limited fraction systematically monitored. Current population estimation methods are too slow to match the rapid extinction rates. This paper outlines initial stages of our work, which ultimately aims to ecological monitoring by integrating machine learning with crowdsourced citizen science. Specifically, here we report on our work-in-progress testing two approaches for classifying camera-trap data: engaging school students through Zooniverse and using a gamified platform with a broader audience. Our goal with this work is to determine the better approach to approximate expert classifications, in terms of reliability, scalability, and speed. Eventually this research aims to enhance ecologists’ ability to cover more species, and create timely reports about the state of nature, to inform the creation of interventions and policies for a sustainable future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+
from ÂŁ29.99 /Month
  • Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
  • Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
  • Cancel anytime
View plans

Buy Now

Chapter
GBP 19.95
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
GBP 47.99
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
GBP 59.99
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Juvenile males, also referred to as yearlings, tend to leave their original herd and form small groups, which last for a short while before they become adult, and separate. Whereas juvenile females normally remain with their herd.

References

  • Beery, S., Morris, D., Yang, S.: Efficient pipeline for camera trap image review. arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.06772 (2019)

  • Bonney, R., et al.: Next steps for citizen science. Science 343(6178), 1436–1437 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1251554

  • Cardinale, B.J., et al.: Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity. Nature 486(7401), 59–67 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohn, J.P.: Citizen science: can volunteers do real research? BioScience, 58(3), 192–197 (2008). http://www.bioone.org/doi/abs/10.1641/B580303

  • de Silva, E.M.K., et al.: Feasibility of using convolutional neural networks for individual-identification of wild Asian elephants. Mamm. Biol. 102(3), 931–941 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42991-021-00206-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duggan, N. M., et al.: Gamified crowdsourcing as a novel approach to lung ultrasound dataset labeling. arXiv pre-print server (2023). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2306.06773

  • Eikelboom, J.A., et al.: Improving the precision and accuracy of animal population estimates with aerial image object detection. Methods Ecol. Evol. 10(11), 1875–1887 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golumbic, Y.N., Baram-Tsabari, A., Koichu, B.: Engagement and communication features of scientifically successful citizen science projects. Environ. Commun. 14(4), 465–480 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2019.1687101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo, S., et al.: Automatic identification of individual primates with deep learning techniques. iScience, 23(8) (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2020.101412

  • Jackson, C., et al.: Unleashing the power of the Zooniverse: the 2021 Survey of Volunteers (2024). SSRN 4830179,https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4830179

  • Jocher, G., Nishimura, K., Mineeva, T., Vilarino, R.: Yolov5 by ultralytics (2020). https://github.com/ultralytics/yolov5

  • Kelling, S., et al.: A human/computer learning network to improve biodiversity conservation and research. AI Mag. 34(1), 10 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1609/aimag.v34i1.2431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kulits, P., Wall, J., Bedetti, A., Henley, M., Beery, S.: ElephantBook: a semi-automated human-in-the-loop system for elephant re-identification. In: ACM SIGCAS Conference on Computing and Sustainable Societies (COMPASS) (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lahiri, M., Tantipathananandh, C., Warungu, R., Rubenstein, D.I., Berger-Wolf, T.Y.: Biometric animal databases from field photographs: identification of individual zebra in the wild. In: Proceedings of the 1st ACM International Conference on Multimedia Retrieval (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  • Malone, T.W., Laubacher, R.J., Dellarocas, C.: The collective intelligence genome. MIT Sloan Manag. Rev. 51(3), 21–31 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  • Michelucci, P., Dickinson, J.L.: The power of crowds. Science 351(6268), 32–33 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aad6499

  • Nagar, Y.: Essays on collective intelligence [PhD Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology] (2016). http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/105080

  • Nagar, Y., De Boer, P., Garcia, A.C.B.: Accelerating the review of complex intellectual artifacts in crowdsourced innovation challenges. In: Thirty-Seventh International Conference on Information Systems, Dublin, Ireland (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagar, Y., Malone, T.W.: Making business predictions by combining human and machine intelligence in prediction markets. In: Thirty Second International Conference on Information Systems, Shanghai, China (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul, D., et al.: A simple interpretable transformer for fine-grained image classification and analysis. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.04157 (2023)

  • Schröter, M., et al.: Citizen science for assessing ecosystem services: status, challenges and opportunities. Ecosyst. Serv. 28, 80–94 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.09.017

  • Shanley, L.A., Fortson, L., Berger-Wolf, T., Crowston, K., Michelucci, P.: Imagine all the people: citizen science, artificial intelligence, and computational research. arXiv preprint arXiv:2104.00093 (2021)

  • Stevens, S., et al.: Bioclip: A vision foundation model for the tree of life. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (2024)

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, C.V., Parham, J.R., Holmberg, J., Berger-Wolf, T.Y.: The animal id problem: continual curation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.10377 (2021)

  • Tuia, D., et al.: Perspectives in machine learning for wildlife conservation. Nat. Commun. 13(1), 792 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-27980-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weideman, H., et al.: Extracting identifying contours for African elephants and humpback whales using a learned appearance model. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on applications of Computer Vision (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  • Willi, M., et al.: Identifying animal species in camera trap images using deep learning and citizen science. Methods Ecol. Evol. 10(1), 80–91 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.13099

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Dan Malkinson, Ilan Shimshoni and Yuval Nov for advice. We acknowledge Ayala Granat, Bar Lavi and Peter Mason for technical assistance with coding and with the Zooniverse platform; Roi Talbi and Ariel Shamir for expert media classification, and Erik Duhaime and Gunnar Epping at Centaur Labs for technical advice and support. We thank school students and other volunteers who contributed classifications. Special thanks to Achiad Davidson for sharing his expertise, advice, and support, and for his work with school students and volunteers. Partial funding was received from the DSRC at the University of Haifa.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yiftach Nagar .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Ethics declarations

Disclosure of Interests

The authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2025 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Nagar, Y., Shaheen, W., Arazy, O. (2025). Comparing Competing Approaches to Crowdsourced Classifications of Biological Species. In: Themistocleous, M., Bakas, N., Kokosalakis, G., Papadaki, M. (eds) Information Systems. EMCIS 2024. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 536. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-81325-2_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-81325-2_18

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-81324-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-81325-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Keywords

Publish with us

Policies and ethics