Abstract
A great deal of ecological theory is based on simple Lotka-Volterra-type of unstructured population models in the study of complex population dynamics and communities. The main reason is to obtain important information for predicting their future evolution. In these unstructured models, it is assumed that all individuals in the population are identical, with the same birth and death rates, and consume equally from shared resources in a homogeneous environment. In reality, these assumptions are not biologically true but still forms a basis for modeling population ecology. We apply this paradigm on the grazing system consisting of coupled ordinary differential equations describing the dynamics of forage resource and livestock population in a grassland ecosystem. We do this by investigating the dynamics of the individuals at different life-history stages of juvenile and adult livestock. The mathematical derivation of the model is carried out to show how the physiologically structured population model can be approximated using a three stage-structured population model. Thus the resulting system of ordinary differential equations can be solved to predict density-dependent properties of the population since it provides a somewhat close-to-reality description of the natural and traditional grazing system. This model therefore certainly contains the needed information in the modeling methodology and accommodates the necessary amount of biological details about the population.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Berryman, A.: On principles, laws and theory in population ecology. Oikos 103(3), 695–701 (2003)
Berryman, A., Michalski, J., Gutierrez, A., Arditi, R.: Logistic theory of food web dynamics. Ecology 76(2), 336–343 (1995)
Bertness, M., Callaway, R.: Positive interactions in communities. Trends Ecol. Evol. 9(5), 191–193 (1994)
Brännström, Å., Carlsson, L., Simpson, D.: On the convergence of the escalator boxcar train. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 51(6), 3213–3231 (2013)
Byström, P., Andersson, J.: Size-dependent foraging capacities and intercohort competition in an ontogenetic omnivore (arctic char). Oikos 110(3), 523–536 (2005)
Cherrett, J.: Ecological concepts; the contribution of ecology to an understanding of the natural world. 04; QH540, C4 1988 (1989)
Chesson, P.: Macarthur’s consumer-resource model. Theor. Popul. Biol. 37(1), 26–38 (1990)
Cohen, J., Pimm, S., Yodzis, P., Saldaña, J.: Body sizes of animal predators and animal prey in food webs. J. Anim. Ecol. 67–78 (1993)
Connell, J.: On the prevalence and relative importance of interspecific competition: evidence from field experiments. Am. Nat. 122(5), 661–696 (1983)
Cropp, R., Norbury, J.: Population interactions in ecology: a rule-based approach to modeling ecosystems in a mass-conserving framework. SIAM Rev. 57(3), 437–465 (2015)
Cuddington, K.: The “balance of nature’’ metaphor and equilibrium in population ecology. Biol. Philos. 16(4), 463–479 (2001)
Diekmann, O., Gyllenberg, M., Metz, J.: Physiologically structured population models: towards a general mathematical theory. In: Mathematics for Ecology and Environmental Sciences, pp. 5–20. Springer (2007)
Durinx, M., Metz, J.H., Meszéna, G.: Adaptive dynamics for physiologically structured population models. J. Math. Biol. 56(5), 673–742 (2008)
Ginzburg, L.: The theory of population dynamics: I. back to first principles. J. Theor. Biol. 122(4), 385–399 (1986)
Gross, J., Shipley, L.A., Hobbs, N.T., Spalinger, D., Wunder, B.: Functional response of herbivores in food-concentrated patches: tests of a mechanistic model. Ecology 74(3), 778–791 (1993)
Hastings, A.: Global stability in lotka-volterra systems with diffusion. J. Math. Biol. 6(2), 163–168 (1978)
Hastings, A.: Mckendrick von foerster models for patch dynamics. In: Differential Equations Models in Biology, Epidemiology and Ecology, pp. 189–199. Springer (1991)
Jackson, L., Trebitz, A., Cottingham, K.: An introduction to the practice of ecological modeling. Bioscience 50(8), 694–706 (2000)
Krementz, D., Brown, P.W., Kehoe, F., Houston, C.: Population dynamics of white-winged scoters. J. Wildl. Manag. 222–227 (1997)
Lawton, J.: Are there general laws in ecology? Oikos 177–192 (1999)
Liu, Y., He, Z.: Behavioral analysis of a nonlinear three-staged population model with age-size-structure. Appl. Math. Comput. 227, 437–448 (2014)
Lundberg, S., Persson, L.: Optimal body size and resource density. J. Theor. Biol. 164(2), 163–180 (1993)
Lundström, N., Loeuille, N., Meng XB, M., Brännström, A.: Meeting yield and conservation objectives by harvesting both juveniles and adults. Am. Nat. 193(3), 373–390 (2019)
Metz, J., De Roos, A.: The role of physiologically structured population models within a general individual-based modelling perspective. In: Individual Based Models and Approaches in Ecology: Populations, Communities, and Ecosystems, pp. 88–111 (1992)
Metz, J., Diekmann, O.: Age dependence. In: The Dynamics of Physiologically Structured Populations, pp. 136–184. Springer (1986)
Metz, J., Diekmann, O.: The dynamics of physiologically structured populations, vol. 86. Springer (1986)
Meza, M., Bhaya, A., Kaszkurewicz, E., da Silveira, C.: On–off policy and hysteresis on–off policy control of the herbivore-vegetation dynamics in a semi-arid grazing system. Ecol. Eng. 28(2), 114–123 (2006)
Mittelbach, G.: Foraging efficiency and body size: a study of optimal diet and habitat use by bluegills. Ecology 62(5), 1370–1386 (1981)
Nankinga, L., Carlsson, L.: A mathematical model for harvesting in a stage-structured cannibalistic system. In: Submitted to Proceedings of SPAS 2019, pp. 735–751. Springer (2020)
Neubert, M., Caswell, H.: Density-dependent vital rates and their population dynamic consequences. J. Math. Biol. 41(2), 103–121 (2000)
Odenbaugh, J.: The “structure” of population ecology: philosophical reflections on unstructured and structured models. na (2005)
Owen-Smith, N.: Credible models for herbivore-vegetation systems: towards an ecology of equations: starfield festschrift. S. Afr. J. Sci. 98(9), 445–449 (2002)
Owen-Smith, N.: A metaphysiological modelling approach to stability in herbivore-vegetation systems. Ecol. Model. 149(1–2), 153–178 (2002)
Pennycuick, C., Compton, R., Beckingham, L.: A computer model for simulating the growth of a population, or of two interacting populations. J. Theor. Biol. 18(3), 316–329 (1968)
Persson, L., Leonardsson, K., Christensen, B.: Ontogenetic scaling of foraging rates and the dynamics of a size-structured consumer-resource model. Theor. Popul. Biol. 54(3), 270–293 (1998)
de Roos, A.: Numerical methods for structured population models: the escalator boxcar train. Numer. Methods Part. Differ. Equ. 4(3), 173–195 (1988)
de Roos, A.: A gentle introduction to physiologically structured population models. In: Structured-Population Models in Marine, Terrestrial, and Freshwater Systems, pp. 119–204. Springer (1997)
de Roos, A.: Interplay between individual growth and population feedbacks shapes body-size distributions. In: Body Size: The Structure and Function of Aquatic Ecosystems, pp. 225–244. Cambridge University Press (2007)
de Roos, A., Diekmann, O., Metz, J.: Studying the dynamics of structured population models: a versatile technique and its application to daphnia. Am. Nat. 139(1), 123–147 (1992)
de Roos, A., Persson, L.: Physiologically structured models-from versatile technique to ecological theory. Oikos 94(1), 51–71 (2001)
de Roos, A., Persson, L.: Population and community ecology of ontogenetic development, vol. 59. Princeton University Press (2013)
de Roos, A., Schellekens, T., van Kooten, T., van de Wolfshaar, K., Claessen, D., Persson, L.: Simplifying a physiologically structured population model to a stage-structured biomass model. Theor. Popul. Biol. 73(1), 47–62 (2008)
Sabelis, M., Diekmann, O., Jansen, V.: Metapopulation persistence despite local extinction: predator-prey patch models of the lotka-volterra type. Biol. J. Lin. Soc. 42(1–2), 267–283 (1991)
Sæther, B.E., Bakke, Ø.: Avian life history variation and contribution of demographic traits to the population growth rate. Ecology 81(3), 642–653 (2000)
Sisodiya, A., Singh, B., Joshi, B.: Effect of two interacting populations on resource following generalized logistic growth. Appl. Math. Sci. 5(9), 407–420 (2011)
Turchin, P.: Does population ecology have general laws? Oikos 94(1), 17–26 (2001)
Walzer, A.: Logic and rhetoric in malthus’s essay on the principle of population, 1798. Q. J. Speech 73(1), 1–17 (1987)
Webb, G.: Logistic models of structured population growth. In: Hyperbolic Partial Differential Equations, pp. 527–539. Elsevier (1986)
Weisberg, P., Coughenour, M., Bugmann, H.: Modelling of large herbivore-vegetation interactions in a landscape context. Conservation Biology Series-Cambridge- 11, 348 (2006)
Acknowledgements
This research work was supported by Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (Sida) and International Science Programme (ISP) in collaboration with Sida-Makerere Bilateral Research Cooperation. Canpwonyi is so much grateful to the Research environment at Mathematics and Applied Mathematics (MAM), Division of Applied Mathematics, Malardalen University for providing a conducive and enabling atmosphere for education and research. Canpwonyi also wants to thank B.K. Nannyonga, G.M. Malinga, and A. Ssematimba for their guidance in the course of his studies.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix–Systematic Derivation of the Maturation Rates of Juveniles and Adults
Appendix–Systematic Derivation of the Maturation Rates of Juveniles and Adults
Our task is to write the maturation rates of the juveniles \(x_wg_1(x_w,N)l_1(x_w,t)\) and \(x_mg_2(x_m,F)l_2(x_m,t)\) in terms of \(L_1\), \(L_2\) and A.
At the equilibrium, \(\frac{\partial }{\partial t}l_1^{*}(x,t) =\frac{\partial }{\partial t}l_2^{*}(x,t)=0\), and the juvenile dynamics becomes
Now by considering Eq. (34.40) and dividing both sides by \(g_1(x,N)l_1^{*}(x,t)\) we have;
.
Integrating from size \(x_b\) to any size x and using juvenile growth rate we obtain
or equivalently
Therefore the maturation rate of \(l_1\) into \(l_2\), attained at \(x_w\), is given by
The equilibrium juvenile distribution for \(l_1\) is therefore given by
Next we calculate the juvenile biomass density for \(L_1\) by substituting Equation (34.2) in Eq. (34.17) so that
or equivalently
and substituting this in Eq. (34.42) we have the juvenile maturation rate of \(L_1\) from \(x_b\) to \(x_w\)
where
The juvenile maturation rate of \(L_2\) from size \(x_w\) to size \(x_{m}\) can as well be derived in a similar fashion to give
where
With these maturation rates for the juveniles substituted in the juvenile dynamics, we obtain the set of ordinary differential equations describing the three stage-structured population model for the grazing system given in (34.36).
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Canpwonyi, S., Carlsson, L. (2022). On the Approximation of Physiologically Structured Population Model with a Three Stage-Structured Population Model in a Grazing System. In: Malyarenko, A., Ni, Y., Rančić, M., Silvestrov, S. (eds) Stochastic Processes, Statistical Methods, and Engineering Mathematics . SPAS 2019. Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics, vol 408. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-17820-7_34
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-17820-7_34
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-17819-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-17820-7
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)
Keywords
- Physiologically structured-population
- Stage-structured population models
- Life-history stages
- Grazing system
- Forage
- Grassland ecosystem